Abstract
The Egyptian spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus, is a recently described model organism for regeneration studies. It has surprising powers of regeneration with relatively fast repairing mechanisms and reduced inflammation form compared to other mammals. Although several studies have documented the exceptional capabilities of Acomys to regenerate different tissues after injury, its response to different cellular and genetic stresses is not yet investigated. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate Acomys abilities to resist genotoxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation induced by acute and subacute treatments with lead acetate. Responses of Acomys were compared with those of the lab mouse (Mus musculus), which displays signatures of the “typical” mammalian response to various stressors. Cellular and genetic stresses were induced by using acute and subacute doses of Lead acetate (400 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg for 5 days, respectively). The assessment of genotoxicity was carried out by using comet assay, while oxidative stress was evaluated by measuring the biomarkers; MDA, GSH and antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD. Moreover, inflammation was assessed by analyzing the expression of some inflammatory-regeneration-related genes: CXCL1, IL1-β, and Notch 2 and immunohistochemical staining of TNF-α protein in brain tissue, in addition to histopathological examination of brain, liver, and kidneys. The obtained results revealed a unique resistance potency of Acomys to genotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation in certain tissues in comparison to Mus. Altogether, the results revealed an adaptive and protective response to cellular and genetic stresses in Acomys.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The molecular or cellular events taken in response to damage tend to differ between organisms. Some tend to be more resistant to biological stress than others, thus would have higher potentials to repair the damage, eliminate the stress, and ensure the organism’s survival. These potentials were known to be relatively limited in mammals when discussing the healing mechanisms. However, one remarkable mammal has been recently discovered with some exceptional capabilities of healing and regeneration: the Egyptian spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus)1. Its regeneration capabilities were first documented experimentally by Seifert et al.2. When compared with the rest of the mammals, A. cahirinus showed more improved regeneration responses. It was able of fully recovery after harmful damage, showed an epimorphic scar-free regeneration of damaged tissues, retrieved organs’ functionality in relatively brief periods of time, and expressed a blunted immune system with reduced inflammatory reactions1,2,3,4.
With those outstanding features, Acomys species has become the most powerful tool for regenerative medicine, healing, and stress-resistance studies, and turned into subject of interest for broad range of research fields. Multiple injury-test experiments were performed on different tissues of A. cahirinus such as skin5,6,7,8,9,10,11, ear12,13, Muscles14,15, heart16,17,18, spinal cord19, kidneys20. However, it has not been investigated yet whether these abilities were also applied on the cellular and genetic stresses or not. Thus, in the present study, we are investigating how A. cahirinus would respond to cellular and genotoxic stimuli.
Harmful agents as toxicants tend to cause different forms of damage to organisms, eventually causing biological stress to different biological levels of the body, accompanied with a form of imbalance to the homeostatic state of it. One of such effects can be seen at the molecular level as direct damage to DNA causing genotoxicity21. The destruction of the genetic material of the cell can cause profound changes to gene product, causing numerous pathologies that might be eventually lethal, thus the study of DNA damage responses is considered important for disease management22,23. Moreover, indirect genotoxicity can also result from toxicants by causing oxidative stress21. Oxidative stress is known as an imbalance between the free reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced in the body and the biological system’s ability to detoxify and repair this damage with antioxidants24. ROS are normally produced by the body to play several physiological roles, however, when their levels are elevated, cells, tissues, and even the genetic material can get damaged. In order to prevent such consequences, the body has an antioxidant defensive system to protect it from ROS-induced damage. On the other hand, toxicants and several other environmental stressors can greatly contribute to the overproduction of the ROS, when this happens, genotoxic and oxidative stress results.
The variability in the organisms’ ability to resist genotoxicity including oxidative stress confirms the variation in genetic regulation of stress25. For this reason, we aimed to investigate if Acomys could have potential to resist genotoxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation induced by treatment with lead acetate. These potentials were compared with those of ordinary lab mouse Mus musculus. We used Lead acetate (LA) as an inducer of genotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation26,27,28. LA effect was assessed in three of its target organs: brain, liver, and kidneys. Parameters evaluated were the Comet assay for genotoxic estimation at DNA level, the MDA, reduced GSH and antioxidant enzymes catalase (CAT) and sodium oxide dismutase (SOD) parameters for oxidative stress, and the expression of some inflammatory-regeneration-related genes: CXCL1, IL1-β, and Notch 2 and immunohistochemical staining of TNF-α protein in brain tissue. The three tissues were also assessed with histopathological examination.
Results
Responses of Acomys and Mus to acute treatment (single dose; 400 mg/kg) of LA
Comet assay
Table 1 showed that treatment with LA single dose induced significant (P < 0.05) increases in all studied comet parameters of Acomys and Mus as compared to their respective controls. The % change values of TM showed that the extent of DNA damage was lower in Acomys brain and liver (89.7%and 230%, respectively) compared to Mus (161.4% and 261%, respectively).
Oxidative stress
All LA-treated groups of Acomys and Mus showed elevated levels of MDA compared to their respective controls (Fig. 1a–c). However, this elevation was significant (p < 0.05) only in the brain tissue (Fig. 1a). The induction of MDA after LA treatment in brain tissue of Acomys is lower than Mus (% change 27% and 396%, respectively). On the other hand, the brain, liver, and kidneys contents of GSH were always remarkably lower in all LA-treated groups for both genera compared to their respective controls (Fig. 1d–f). The data of percent change (Fig. 1d–f) revealed that the depletion of GSH levels in the treated groups was pronounced in the Acomys compared to the Mus. In addition, the % change of both antioxidant enzymes SOD and CAT (Fig. 1g–l) was higher in Mus compared to Acomys in the three studied tissues.
Gene expression analysis
Figure 2 revealed that treatment with the acute dose of LA caused significant upregulation of IL1-B in both brain tissues of Acomys and Mus; however, the response for the upregulation was higher in Mus. Although the expression of the CXCL-1 was also upregulated in Acomys and Mus, both increases were nonsignificant. In contrast, the expression of Notch 2 was significantly downregulated in Acomys and Mus, but the downregulation was higher in Mus (74%) than Acomys (20%) compared to their corresponding controls.
Histopathological examination
Microscopic examination of different layers of cortical region of Acomys and Mus control groups showed well organized apparent intact neurons, intact subcellular and nuclear details, as well as intact intercellular brain matrix with minimal glial cell infiltrates (Fig. 3a,b). Treated Acomys groups showed only minimal records of abnormal degenerative changes, the rest was mostly intact (Fig. 3c), unlike the Mus treated groups whose samples showed severe neuronal degenerative changes allover cortical layers accompanied with severe vacuolization of brain matrix (Fig. 3d). Normal control liver samples of both strains demonstrated normal intact histological features of liver parenchyma, hepatocytes, hepatic vasculatures, and hepatic sinusoids (Fig. 3e,f). Both treated Acomys and Mus groups showed severe dilatation of hepatic central veins with minimal inflammatory cells infiltrates (Fig. 3g,h). Acomys showed moderate degenerative and necrotic changes in perivascular hepatocytes (Fig. 3g) while Mus showed vacuolar degenerative changes widespread all-over different zones of the hepatic lobules (Fig. 3h). Kidneys samples of all the control groups have also demonstrated normal intact histological features of renal parenchyma, renal corpuscles, renal tubules with almost intact tubular epithelium (Fig. 3i,j), on the other hand, both species’ samples showed severe degenerative and necrotic changes of renal tubular epithelium, mild congested glomerular tufts and intratubular blood vessels (Fig. 3k,l).
Responses of Acomys and Mus to subacute treatment (multiple doses; 50 mg/kg) of LA
Comet assay
The data of comet assay (Table 2) showed significant (P < 0.05) increases in TL and TM of LA-treated groups of both Acomys and Mus compared to their corresponding controls. The values of the percent change (% of change relative to corresponding control) of TL, tail DNA%, and TM showed that the extent of DNA damage was lower in Acomys brain and kidneys compared to Mus (Table 2) and the attached supplementary figures (1, 2 & 3) illustrate the extent of DNA damage in the three examined tissues (supplementary file).
Oxidative stress
Compared to the corresponding controls, MDA levels were elevated in all studied tissues of the LA-treated groups of both genera, but these elevations were only significant in the brain and liver tissues. The MDA content in brain tissue of Acomys was extremely lower compared to Mus reflecting high potential to resist oxidative stress. On the other hand, GSH contents of all studied tissues of both genera were significantly reduced compared to their corresponding controls (Fig. 4). Compared to the corresponding controls, the antioxidant enzymes SOD and CAT activity was significantly decreased in all studied tissues in both animal species, while the % change was higher in Mus than in Acomys (Fig. 4g–l).
Gene expression analysis (B)
Compared with the corresponding controls, the expression of IL1-β in the brain samples of Acomys and Mus treated groups were significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated by 375% and 1294% respectively. The mRNA expression level of CXCL-1 in Mus after exposure to Pb acetate was significantly) higher compared to the control. On contrary, the gene expression level of CXCL-1 in Acomys administered LA was insignificantly lower than in the controls. In Acomys and Mus exposed to 50 mg/kg LA, the gene expression level of Notch 2 was elevated by 99% and 39% respectively as compared to their respective controls (Fig. 5).
Histopathological examination (B)
Brain cortical region of Acomys and Mus (Fig. 6a,b) respectively, show intact nuclear details. The effect of the 50 mg/kg subacute doses of LA had almost similar effects as the 400 mg/kg single acute dose in brain cortex of the experimental groups (Fig. 6c,d). Normal control liver samples of Acomys and Mus (Fig. 6e,f) respectively, both show intact subcellular details of hepatic tissues and hepatic vasculatures. On the other hand, the effect on the liver of the treated group of Mus was observed as severe dilatation in the hepatic vasculatures, moderate activated Kupffer cells in hepatic sinusoids accompanied with many figures of apoptotic bodies formation and perivascular inflammatory cells infiltrates (Fig. 6h). While in the Acomys there were more severe degenerative changes in hepatocytes with pyknotic nuclei allover hepatic lobules (Fig. 6g). The histological examination of the kidney’s samples of normal control Acomys and Mus show the intact renal corpuscles and tubular epithelium (Fig. 6i,j). While the subacute treatment showed more severe records of degenerative tubular epithelium changes, as well as higher congested BVs in the Mus than the Acomys. Occasional periglomerular inflammatory cells infiltrates were observed too in both strains (Fig. 6k,l).
Immunohistochemical examination
Compared with the corresponding controls, the protein expression of TNF-α in the cortical region of brain samples of Acomys and Mus treated groups were significantly (p < 0.05) increased. The expression of TNF-α in the cortex of Mus of both treatment (acute and subacute) was significantly upregulated compared to the treated groups of Acomys Fig. 7.
Discussion
The spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus is a recently described model organism for regeneration studies. It displays surprising powers of regeneration among mammals because it does not form a scar (fibrose) in response to tissue injury as most other mammals do4. Although several studies have documented the regeneration capabilities of Acomys after different tissue injuries, the response of Acomys to different cellular and genetic stresses is not yet investigated. This study aimed to investigate if Acomys could have potential to resist genotoxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation induced by treatment with lead acetate. These potentials were compared with those of ordinary lab mouse Mus musculus, which has a typical mammalian response to various stressors. Several studies reported that LA is a stressor that can elicit cellular stress response in mice. These stresses include genotoxic stress28,29,30, oxidative stress31,32,33, and inflammatory responses34,35. Accordingly, in the present study LA was chosen for its documented ability to induce genotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation.
The in vivo single cell gel electrophoresis, also called comet assay used in the present study was a very sensitive method to detect single breaks of DNA and determination of genotoxic potential of toxic agents36. Treatment with LA either acute or subacute doses induced DNA damage in both genera (Acomys and Mus) as indicated by the significant increase (p < 0.05) in tail moment (TM) values of the comet assay as compared to their respective controls. Mohamed et al. (2017) attributed genotoxicity to variable toxins that interact with the DNA structure and its sequence causing either direct damage by altering the DNA repair mechanism, or indirect damage due to gene and protein alternation or formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)21. ROS were believed to cause genotoxicity not only indirectly by disrupting the homeostasis between the oxidants and antioxidants, but also directly by interacting with the nucleophilic centers within the cell, eventually this damage would be observed as single or double DNA strand breaks or DNA adduct formation37. In this study, LA was used for its direct and indirect damaging effects38.
The results of comet assay (% change values of tail moment (TM) revealed that acute LA treatment induced lower DNA damage in Acomys compared to Mus in brain and liver tissues. On the contrary, acute LA treatment induced higher DNA damage in Acomys kidneys compared to Mus. This suggests that Acomys kidneys are more sensitive to acute LA treatment. Dickinson et al. (2007) reported that spiny mice have a significantly reduced kidney mass and volume, and fewer glomeruli, compared with laboratory mice39. This is likely to affect the filtration surface area and capacity for glomerular ultrafiltration of the kidney. These structural and functional differences may account for the increased DNA damage observed in kidney tissue of Acomys. Moreover, kidneys play role in mediating toxicity of multiple drugs, and that lead is one of the nephrotoxicants40. Acomys kidneys possibly could not accommodate the large dose of LA in 24 h. For the groups treated with subacute doses of LA, the results showed that the potential capacity of Acomys to resist DNA damage is higher than Mus in brain and kidneys but not in liver. The higher DNA damage observed in Acomys liver cannot be explained.
Although treatment with acute and subacute doses of LA created genotoxic stress in both genera, there was a tangible difference of Acomys being normally more immune within its natural habitats observed as lower DNA damage in brain, liver, and kidney samples of the untreated control groups compared to those of Mus. GSH natural contents in brain, liver, and kidneys of untreated controls were also found to be higher in Acomys compared to Mus, this could indicate stronger defense system against oxidants in Acomys more than Mus, this goes in line with observations and explanations of previous studies41,42,43,44.
Oxidative stress was defined as an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants in favor of oxidants. In the present study, oxidative stress biomarkers were used: determination of malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione (GSH) and antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD. MDA is one of the most commonly studied end products for lipid peroxidation that is used for estimation of oxidative stress45. Moreover, GSH is an important peptide in redox management and was used as a marker for assessing the level of oxidative stress in several studies46,47. On the same manner, CAT and SOD act as scavengers for ROS neutralizing their damaging oxidative stress24.
The results of oxidative stress biomarkers indicated that acute administration of LA caused increase in MDA levels in all the studied tissues (brain, liver, and kidneys). This increase was only significant in brain tissues, besides to brain and liver tissues of both genera following the subacute LA administration. The significant increase in MDA levels in brain tissues could be assigned to the increase of lipid peroxidation after administration of LA. Raouf et al.48 and Haliwell49 concluded that the brain is more sensitive to oxidative damage than other tissues for its insufficient aerobic metabolism along with extra ROS production, eventually leading to more free-radicals reactions initiations. The overproduction of MDA was parallel to the reduction of GSH, this goes in line with all the previous studies regarding oxidative stress, attributed to the relation between increased formation of ROS and protective detoxification role of antioxidants50. In all LA treated groups, lower levels of MDA were detected in Acomys in most of the evaluated tissues compare to Mus, which indicate stronger oxidative stress resistance for Acomys than Mus. The ability of Acomys to resist the oxidative stress may correlate with the high basal GSH content measured in almost all studied tissues of untreated controls.
The high basal GSH, CAT and SOD may scavenge ROS and inhibit lipid peroxidation. The results also showed that the reduction in MDA level in Acomys tissues is accompanied with reduction in DNA damage. Scavenging of ROS and inhibition of lipid peroxidation may protect the cellular macromolecules, including DNA, from oxidative damage.
LA toxicity was clearly detected through histopathological examination of both species following both: acute and subacute treatments, but it was noticeable to be mostly less severe in Acomys, suggesting it to have higher tolerance and resistance to toxicity-induced histological changes. LA neurotoxicity in Mus appears to be in line with the extreme oxidative damage detected earlier. The neurodegenerative changes, the vacuolization, disrupted shapes of cells, and irregularity of nuclei, all concur with the Saleh and Meligy findings of LA effects on cortex in adult albino rats51. All together, these correlations and histological changes could be attributed to the oxidative damage caused to critical biomolecules as lipids, proteins, and DNA, by the LA52. The tissue damage severity in liver samples of Acomys observed during histopathological examination following the subacute LA treatment, as well, goes in line with the high TM, the high MDA level, and the low GSH level detected compared with those of Mus results. On the other hand, the severity observed histologically in the Acomys kidneys samples following the acute LA treatment goes in line with the TM and MDA. This could be supporting to our hypothesis that indicates a relation between the lower size of Acomys kidneys and the higher sensitivity to toxicants, Acomys kidneys have high potentials to resist damage even though their sizes are not helpful as they need. Imagine it as an imbalance between the tendency for resistance and the tendency for accommodation to damage in brief period of time. Whatever the case is, our histopathological findings agree with the findings of Raouf et al. regarding the LA effects48.
In this study we also detected several differences in the expression of some genes believed to be inflammation-related in the brain tissue. Two of which are pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines which play important roles in immunity protection and injury repairing53. IL-1β is one member of the cytokine family most linked to innate immune responses that include the major inflammatory mediators53,54. As expected, IL-1β was overexpressed in brains of both species in all treated groups. These results go in line with the increased levels of this gene during systemic inflammation in CNS detected in previous studies55. The extreme significant overexpression following both acute and subacute LA treatments, compared to the other genes evaluated, supports the evidence provided for the localization of IL-1β receptor in the brain that indicates for its key role as an inflammatory stressor neuroregulator of CNS56. However, this upregulation was less in Acomys than Mus indicated as 379% and 375% in Acomys vs. 408% and 1294% in Mus following acute and subacute LA treatments respectively, suggesting higher resistance to LA induced inflammation. The same difference between Acomys and Mus levels of IL-1β was detected with Brant et al.6. The same applies for the chemoattractant CXCl-1 levels following the subacute LA treatment where it was only significantly overexpressed in Mus. In contrast, it was not significantly altered in either species following the acute LA treatment. In consistent with the previous illustrated data, the protein expression of proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α in the brain cortex was significantly elevated in Acomys compared to Mus. Kanhaiya et al.57 illustrated that LA increase the release of TNF-α in brain tissue.
Additionally, Notch 2 expression was evaluated since it was proved to have key role in regulating innate immune and inflammatory responses58. Following the acute LA treatment, Notch 2 was downregulated significantly in both species, but the reduction was greater in Mus than in Acomys (−74% vs −20% respectively). The same result was obtained in previous study when mice were exposed to acute UVB irradiation5. On the other hand, Notch 2 was upregulated in both species following the subacute LA treatment, and the greater expression was in Acomys (99%) compared to Mus (39%). This ambivalence in Notch 2 expression between acute and subacute treatments may in part be attributed to the conflicting functions of Notch signaling in various regulations, including inflammation, proliferation, regeneration, and cell fate59,60, as it is believed that the various ligand-receptor complexes of Notch signaling lead to different proteolytic events based on the stimuli that triggered it, different stimuli subjecting different ligands and receptors activate different signaling pathways58,61.
In summary, this study describes for the first time the potential capacity of the spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus) to resist genotoxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation induced by acute and subacute lead acetate treatment. The results reflect a strong adaptive and protective response that Acomys cahirinus has developed to cellular or genetic stressors. Further studies are needed to clarify the correlation between the potential capacity of Acomys to resist DNA damage, oxidative stress and inflammation and its exceptional capabilities of healing and regeneration.
Materials and methods
All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Experimental animals
A total of 20 Acomys cahirinus and 20 Mus musculus (20–30 g) of either sex, bred and maintained in the institutional animal house were used for the experiment. Mice were housed in well-ventilated cages, under naturally controlled environment of temperature, humidity, and standard day/night light cycles. The animals were allowed standard food pellets and water ad libitum. All mice experiments were carried out following the national guidelines for the care and use of animals. The study was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) at Cairo University with approval number (CU/I/F/86/20). Additionally, all animal studies were performed in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.
Lead acetate (LA) doses and treatment schedule
Lead acetate was purchased from Merck (Merck Company, Germany). LA was dissolved in distilled water and injected intraperitoneally either as a single dose (400 mg/kg) or as multiple doses (50 mg/kg for five consecutive days). The doses of LA were selected based on literature data28,62 and our preliminary experiments, as such doses are well known to exert a suitable biological response (induced genotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation). Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 24 h after the last LA administration. Details of treatment schedule are illustrated in Fig. 8.
Sample collection
At the end of the experiment, the animals of each group were killed by cervical dislocation and their brain, liver, and kidney were carefully dissected, washed with cold PBS, then distributed as suitable-sized portions over prelabelled tubes for further analysis. Tissues stores in RNA later at -80ºC for gene expression analysis, at −20 °C for comet assay, and in buffered formalin for histopathological and immunohistochemical examination.
Experimental outcomes
Comet assay
The extent of DNA damage was evaluated based on the protocol of alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) described by Tice et al. 200036. Slides were examined under fluorescent microscope (Leica, Germany). For each sample, the degree of DNA migration was determined by capturing images for 50 nucleoids at 400× magnification using leica microscope camera. Analysis of comet parameters was done by using TriTek Comet Score™ Version 1.5 software. Tail length (TL), %DNA in tail and tail moment (TM) are used to evaluate the extent of DNA damage.
Oxidative stress biomarkers
A 0.30–0.45 g weighted pieces of tissue samples collected were homogenized in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm at 4 °C and the supernatants were then stored at −20 °C until used for determination of malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione (GSH) and antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD in accordance to following protocols described by Ohkawa et al.63, Beutter et al.64, Aebi65, and Nishikimi et al.66.
Gene expression analysis
Brain samples that were conserved in RNA later at -80 ºC since eradication were used to assess the expression of the genes: CXCL-1, IL-1β, and Notch 2 using the CDKn1-a as a housekeeping gene for normalization. Primers were synthesized by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA)5. RNA was extracted from the samples with RNeasy extraction kit according to manufacturer recommended protocol of (Qiagen GMbH, Germany). Purity and quantity of the RNA samples were assessed using Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000 to assure that concentrations were pure enough to conduct RT-PCR. cDNA was synthesized with an adjusted input of 1 µg of RNA extract using Reverse transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, RevertAid RT Reverse transcription Kit). RT-qPCR was performed using Master mix (SensiFAST ® SYBER No-ROX Kit) in RotorGene-6000 system (Corbett Robotics Australia) following the manufacturer protocol. For qPCR data analysis, Rotor-Gene Q series software (v.1.7) was used for a comparative quantification analysis. Relative gene expressions were calculated with the improved 2-ΔΔCT method that directly uses the CT values obtained from the real time qPCR system67.
Estimation of histopathological parameters
Tissue samples collected were immediately fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for at least 72 h at room temperature. Later, following culling procedures and protocols for fixation and staining68, tissues from the brain cortex, liver, and kidneys were processes, sectioned into 5 μm thick sections using rotatory microtome, and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, slides were examined under a microscope (Zeiss, Germany) at 100× magnification for histopathological changes.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical examinations of inflammatory cytokine tumor necrotic factor alpha (TNF-α) was performed using streptavidin–biotin method. 5 microns thick paraffin embedded brain tissue section were prepared. Deparaffinized retrieved tissue sections were treated by 0.3% H2O2 for 20 Mins. Followed by brain samples were incubated anti TNF alpha (NBP1-19532) (1:200)-Novus Bio. Co. overnight at 4 °C. Tissue sections washed out by PBS followed by incubation with secondary antibody HRP Envision kit (DAKO) 20 min; washed out and incubated with diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 15 min. Washed by PBS then counter staining with hematoxylin, dehydrated and clearing in xylene then cover slipped for microscopic examination. According to adopted method form Heba et, al. 202269. 6 non-overlapping fields were randomly selected and scanned from cerebral cortical regions of each sample by examiner histologist using Leica application module for histological analysis attached to full HD microscopic imaging system (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Germany); for the determination of relative mean area percentage of immunohistochemical expression levels of TNF alpha in cerebral cortical neurons.
Statistical analysis
The analyses of the present results were carried out using the Statistical package for social science (SPSS) software version 22. Data were displayed as (mean ± standard error). Independent t-test was applied to illustrate the statistical differences between the studied groups. P < 0.05 represent significant difference.
Data availability
Raw data supporting the results reported in the manuscript are available with the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Sandoval, A. & Maden, M. Regeneration in the spiny mouse, Acomys, a new mammalian model. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 64, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2020.05.019 (2020).
Seifert, A. W. et al. Skin shedding and tissue regeneration in African spiny mice (Acomys). Nature 489(7417), 561–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11499 (2012).
Pinheiro, G., Prata, D. F., Araújo, I. M. & Tiscornia, G. The African spiny mouse (Acomys spp.) as an emerging model for development and regeneration. Lab. Anim. 52(6), 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677218769921 (2018).
Maden, M. & Varholick, J. A. Model systems for regeneration: the spiny mouse. Acomys cahirinus. Development (Cambridge, England) 147(4), dev167718. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.167718 (2020).
Wong, W. et al. Spiny mice (Acomys) exhibit attenuated hallmarks of aging and rapid cell turnover after UV exposure in the skin epidermis. PLoS ONE 15(10), e0241617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241617 (2020).
Brant, J. O., Lopez, M. C., Baker, H. V., Barbazuk, W. B. & Maden, M. A comparative analysis of gene expression profiles during skin regeneration in Mus and Acomys. PLoS ONE 10(11), e0142931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142931 (2015).
Brant, J. O., Yoon, J. H., Polvadore, T., Barbazuk, W. B. & Maden, M. Cellular events during scar-free skin regeneration in the spiny mouse, Acomys. Wound Repair Regener. 24(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12385 (2016).
Stewart, D. C. et al. Unique behavior of dermal cells from regenerative mammal, the African spiny mouse, in response to substrate stiffness. J. Biomech. 81, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.10.005 (2018).
Yoon, J. H., Cho, K., Garrett, T. J., Finch, P. & Maden, M. Comparative proteomic analysis in scar-free skin regeneration in Acomys cahirinus and scarring Mus musculus. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56823-y (2020).
Jiang, T. X., Harn, H. I., Ou, K. L., Lei, M. & Chuong, C. M. Comparative regenerative biology of spiny (Acomys cahirinus) and laboratory (Mus musculus) mouse skin. Exp. Dermatol. 28(4), 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13899 (2019).
Maden, M. Optimal skin regeneration after full thickness thermal burn injury in the spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus. Burns J. Int. Soc. Burn Injuries 44(6), 1509–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.018 (2018).
Matias Santos, D. et al. Ear wound regeneration in the African spiny mouse Acomys cahirinus. Regeneration (Oxford, England) 3(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/reg2.50 (2016).
Gawriluk, T. R. et al. Comparative analysis of ear-hole closure identifies epimorphic regeneration as a discrete trait in mammals. Nat. Commun. 7, 11164. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11164 (2016).
Maden, M. et al. Perfect chronic skeletal muscle regeneration in adult spiny mice, Acomys cahirinus. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 8920. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27178-7 (2018).
Brant, J. O. et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of dermal wound healing reveals de novo skeletal muscle regeneration in Acomys cahirinus. PLoS ONE 14(5), e0216228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216228 (2019).
Qi, Y. et al. Cardiac function is protected from ischemic injury in African spiny mice. Circulation 132(3), A14166–A14166. https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.14166 (2015).
Qi, Y. et al. Intrinsic increased ACE2 expression protects spiny mouse Acomys cahirinus against ischemic-induced cardiac dysfunction. FASEB J. 30, lb561–lb561. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.lb561 (2016).
Qi, Y. et al. Spiny mouse is protected from ischemia induced cardiac injury: Leading role of microRNAs. FASEB J. 31, 721–724. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.721.4 (2017).
Streeter, K. A. et al. Molecular and histologic outcomes following spinal cord injury in spiny mice, Acomys cahirinus. J. Comp. Neurol. 528(9), 1535–1547. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24836 (2020).
Okamura, D. M., Brewer, C. M., Wakenight, P., Bahrami, N., Bernardi, K., Tran, A., & Majesky, M. W. Scarless repair of acute and chronic kidney injury in African spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus). BioRxiv: 315069. https://doi.org/10.1101/315069 (2018).
Mohamed, S. A. K. S., Upreti, S., Rajendra, S. V. & Dang, R. Genotoxicity: Mechanisms, testing guidelines and methods. Glob. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 1(5), 133–138 (2017).
Choy, W. N. Principles of genetic toxicology. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 19(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.3109/01480549608998232 (1996).
Turkez, H., Arslan, M. E. & Ozdemir, O. Genotoxicity testing: Progress and prospects for the next decade. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 13(10), 1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2017.1375097 (2017).
Pizzino, G. et al. Oxidative stress: Harms and benefits for human health. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 8416763. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8416763 (2017).
Velegzhaninov, I. O., Ievlev, V. A., Pylina, Y. I., Shadrin, D. M. & Vakhrusheva, O. M. Programming of cell resistance to genotoxic and oxidative stress. Biomedicines 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines6010005 (2018).
Elrasoul, A. et al. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects of Azolla pinnata ethanolic extract against lead-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 9(10), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9101014 (2020).
Pal, M. et al. Lead Exposure in different organs of mammals and prevention by curcumin-nanocurcumin: A review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 168(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0366-8 (2015).
Fahmy, M. A. Lead acetate genotoxicity in mice. Cytologia 64(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.64.357 (1999).
Hartwig, A. Role of DNA repair inhibition in lead- and cadmium-induced genotoxicity: A review. Environ. Health Perspect. 102(Suppl 3), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.94102s345 (1994).
Ariza, M. E. & Williams, M. V. Lead and mercury mutagenesis: Type of mutation dependent upon metal concentration. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 13(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0461(1999)13:2%3c107::aid-jbt6%3e3.0.co;2-0 (1999).
Ding, Y., Gonick, H. C. & Vaziri, N. D. Lead promotes hydroxyl radical generation and lipid peroxidation in cultured aortic endothelial cells. Am. J. Hypertens. 13(5), 552–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7061(99)00226-5 (2000).
Ercal, N. et al. A role for oxidative stress in suppressing serum immunoglobulin levels in lead-exposed Fisher 344 rats. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 39(2), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002440010102 (2000).
Farmand, F., Ehdaie, A., Roberts, C. K. & Sindhu, R. K. Lead-induced dysregulation of superoxide dismutases, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and guanylate cyclase. Environ. Res. 98(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.05.016 (2005).
Metryka, E. et al. Lead (Pb) exposure enhances expression of factors associated with inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19(6), 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061813 (1813).
Dietert, R. R. & Piepenbrink, M. S. Lead and immune function. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 36(4), 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440500534297 (2006).
Tice, R. R. et al. Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 35(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:3%3c206::aid-em8%3e3.0.co;2-j (2000).
Kang, D. H. Oxidative stress, DNA damage, and breast cancer. AACN Adv. Crit. Care 13(4), 540–549 (2002).
García-Lestón, J., Méndez, J., Pásaro, E. & Laffon, B. Genotoxic effects of lead: An updated review. Environ. Int. 36(6), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.04.011 (2010).
Dickinson, H., Walker, D. W., Cullen-McEwen, L., Wintour, E. M. & Moritz, K. The spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus) completes nephrogenesis before birth. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 289(2), F273–F279. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00400.2004 (2005).
Barnett, L. & Cummings, B. S. Nephrotoxicity and renal pathophysiology: A contemporary perspective. Toxicol. Sci. 164(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy159 (2018).
Turgut, G., Enli, Y., Kaptanoğlu, B., Turgut, S. & Genç, O. Changes in the levels of MDA and GSH in mice. East. J. Med. 11(1–2), 7–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejm/issue/5338/72265 (2013).
Forman, H. J., Zhang, H. & Rinna, A. Glutathione: Overview of its protective roles, measurement, and biosynthesis. Mol. Asp. Med. 30(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.006 (2009).
Rahman, I. & MacNee, W. Lung glutathione and oxidative stress: Implications in cigarette smoke-induced airway disease. Am. J. Physiol. 277(6), L1067–L1088. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.1999.277.6.L1067 (1999).
Kelly, F. J. Gluthathione: In defence of the lung. Food Chem. Toxicol. 37(9–10), 963–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00087-3 (1999).
Tsikas, D. Assessment of lipid peroxidation by measuring malondialdehyde (MDA) and relatives in biological samples: Analytical and biological challenges. Anal. Biochem. 524, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2016.10.021 (2017).
Pastore, A. et al. Determination of blood total, reduced, and oxidized glutathione in pediatric subjects. Clin. Chem. 47(8), 1467–1469 (2001).
Lu, S. C. Glutathione synthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1830(5), 3143–3153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.008 (2013).
MohammedRaouf, G. A. et al. Terminalia arjuna bark extract inhibits histological alterations by mitigating oxidative stress in lead intoxicated mice. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 13, 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-013-0112-8 (2013).
Halliwell, B. Oxidants and the central nervous system: Some fundamental questions. Is oxidant damage relevant to Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, traumatic injury or stroke?. Acta Neurol. Scand. Suppl. 126, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb01779.x (1989).
Surapaneni, K. M. & Venkataramana, G. Status of lipid peroxidation, glutathione, ascorbic acid, vitamin E and antioxidant enzymes in patients with osteoarthritis. Indian J. Med. Sci. 61(1), 9–14 (2007).
Saleh, S. & Meligy, F. Study on toxic effects of lead acetate on cerebellar cortical tissue of adult albino rats and the role of vitamin E as a protective agent. Ain Shams J. Forensic Med. Clin. Toxicol. 31(2), 110–118 (2018).
Dabidi, R. V., Hosseinzadeh, S., Mahjoub, S., Hosseinzadeh, M. & Myers, J. Endurance exercise training and diferuloyl methane supplement: Changes in neurotrophic factor and oxidative stress induced by lead in rat brain. Biol. Sport 30(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1029820 (2013).
Boro, M. & Balaji, K. N. CXCL1 and CXCL2 regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation via G-protein-coupled receptor CXCR2. J. Immunol. 199(5), 1660–1671. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700129 (2017).
Dinarello, C. A. Immunological and inflammatory functions of the interleukin-1 family. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 519–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132612 (2009).
Wong, M. L., Bongiorno, P. B., Rettori, V., McCann, S. M. & Licinio, J. Interleukin (IL) 1beta, IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-10, and IL-13 gene expression in the central nervous system and anterior pituitary during systemic inflammation: Pathophysiological implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94(1), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.1.227 (1997).
Ren, K. & Torres, R. Role of interleukin-1beta during pain and inflammation. Brain Res. Rev. 60(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.020 (2009).
Kumawat, K. L., Kaushik, D. K., Goswami, P. & Basu, A. Acute exposure to lead acetate activates microglia and induces subsequent bystander neuronal death via caspase-3 activation. Neurotoxicology 41, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2014.02.002 (2014).
Shang, Y., Smith, S. & Hu, X. Role of Notch signaling in regulating innate immunity and inflammation in health and disease. Protein Cell 7(3), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-016-0250-0 (2016).
Miele, L. & Osborne, B. Arbiter of differentiation and death: Notch signaling meets apoptosis. J. Cell. Physiol. 181(3), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199912)181:3%3c393::AID-JCP3%3e3.0.CO;2-6 (1999).
Yahyanejad, S., Theys, J. & Vooijs, M. Targeting Notch to overcome radiation resistance. Oncotarget 7(7), 7610–7628. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6714 (2016).
Christopoulos, P. F. et al. Targeting the Notch signaling pathway in chronic inflammatory diseases. Front. Immunol. 12, 668207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.668207 (2021).
Ahmed, M. B., Ahmed, M. I., Meki, A. R. & Abdraboh, N. Neurotoxic effect of lead on rats: Relationship to apoptosis. Int. J. Health Sci. 7(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.12816/0006042 (2013).
Ohkawa, H., Ohishi, N. & Yagi, K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal. Biochem. 95(2), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3 (1979).
Beutler, E., Duron, O. & Kelly, B. M. Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 61, 882–888 (1963).
Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 105, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3 (1984).
Nishikimi, M., Appaji, N. & Yagi, K. The occurrence of superoxide anion in the reaction of reduced phenazine methosulfate and molecular oxygen. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 46(2), 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(72)80218-3 (1972).
Rao, X., Huang, X., Zhou, Z. & Lin, X. An improvement of the 2ˆ(−delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostat. Bioinform. Biomath. 3(3), 71–85 (2013).
Culling, C. F. A. Handbook of Histopathological and Histochemical Techniques: Including Museum Techniques (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013).
Gad, H. A. et al. Plurol will not miss the boat: A new manifesto of galantamine conveyance. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103516 (2022).
Acknowledgements
The study was conducted at the Genetics Laboratory Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. Authors would like to thank Dr. Atef Ali for his assistance in assessing statistics. Authors would like to thank Dr. Mohamed Khattab for his assistance in the histopathogical and immunohistochemical staining analysis.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.N.G. performed the experiments, analyzed, and graphed data, and wrote initial draft of the manuscript. S.E., M.N. and A.A. conceived, designed, planned, and supervised the study; they also analyzed data, interpreted results, wrote, critically revised, and edited the manuscript. All authors read the manuscript and approved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghebryal, L.N., Noshy, M.M., El-Ghor, A.A. et al. Comparative analysis of Acomys cahirinus and Mus musculus responses to genotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Sci Rep 13, 3989 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31143-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31143-4
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.