Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Perspective Chapter: Species Diversity and Distribution of Catfishes and Their Current Contribution to Global Food Security

Written By

Don Felix Ouma and James E. Barasa

Submitted: 15 July 2022 Reviewed: 22 July 2022 Published: 30 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106706

From the Edited Volume

Catfish - Advances, Technology, Experiments

Edited by Muhammed Atamanalp

Chapter metrics overview

145 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Ranking fifth in global aquaculture production of farmed fin fishes, with a total tonnage of 5, 518 878 metric tons worth US$ 10 569 972 Billion, Catfishes are exceptionally important as a seafood product. They are an especially important food resource in developing countries, more so since their farmed production does not require sophisticated technology. The diversity and natural distribution of catfishes are documented. Farmed production of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in the Mekong delta and Ictalurus punctatus in China is reviewed as global success story in the culture of catfishes. Important lessons from these ventures are drawn for the culture of clariid catfishes, the dominant group farmed in Africa. Amongst this family, the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822) is the most widely cultured species, due to its hardy nature. However, its culture is constrained by insufficient seed supply, due to poor survival of fingerlings. These challenges are brought to the fore, so that future research efforts explore strategies of countenance, in order to increase food fish production, incomes, and livelihoods in Africa.

Keywords

  • catfishes
  • species diversity
  • clariids
  • survival
  • seed production
  • Pangasius

1. Introduction

1.1 Diversity of Catfishes

Catfishes are a diverse group of ray-finned fish named for their prominent barbells, which resemble cat whiskers. Catfishes belong to the Phylum Chordata, class Actinopterygii, and of Order siluriforms. The group has about 40 families distributed around the globe. Despite their name, not all catfishes have prominent barbells, some members of the order siluriforms are defined by features of the skull and the swim bladder. They are most diverse in tropical South America, Africa, and Asia, but more than half of all catfish species are to be found in America. Catfishes are important biodiversity resources, playing important ecological roles in food chains in aquatic ecosystems. Similarly, they form important food fish for local communities and contribute to income generation and livelihoods (Table 1). According to [2] the most cultured among global catfish populations are the Amur catfish (Silurus arsotus), Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus), Stripped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, and the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Africa has ten siluriform families [2, 3, 4], which include: Amphiliidae, Ariidae, Austroglanididae, Bagridae, Clariidae, Claroteidae, Malapteruridae, Mochokidae, Plotosidae, and Schilbeidae. Catfishes group into 32 families, distributed globally, with currently 3,407 valid species [5]. Like the spectacular haplochromine cichlids of the Great lakes of Africa, some groups form species flocks in the habitats where they occur. These include Bathyclarias, endemic in Lake Malawi [6], where they comprise up to 12 species [6].

According to [7], catfishes are distinguished by pairs of barbels, cylindrical body without scales, largemouth, pectoral, and dorsal fins that bear spines. For the clariid family, the key distinguishing feature is the suprabranchial organ formed by arborescent structures from the second and fourth-gill arches [8, 9, 10] and flat dorso-ventrally flattened skulls. Clariidae is naturally distributed in Asia, Syria, and Africa. In Africa, this family has 13 genera and 74 species. Amongst the species include the Heterobranchus species, Dinotopterus, Bathyclarias, Clarias gariepinus, Clarias anguillaris, and other nominal species of Clarias in Africa. The clariids are mostly found in the muddy bottoms where they graze on variety of food materials hence regarded as omnivores. Some clariids such as Xenoclarias and Dinotopterus are found in Lakes Tanganyika, Victoria, and Malawi, the upper Congo, the middle and the upper Zambezi, the Okavango, L. Ngami, the Chobe, the Cunene and the Quanza in South Africa, and other Great lakes of Africa. The Gymnallabes live in turbulent well-oxygenated rivers of the Congo, but they lack the respiratory accessory organs. The Bathyclarias species are also found in Lake Malawi [10, 11] (Table 2).

FamilyCommon nameRegionValid species
Loricaroidei
TrichomycteridaePencil or parasitic catfishesSouth America, Costa Rica, Panama240
CallichthyidaeArmored catfishesSouth America or Panama199
LoricariidaeSuckermouth armored catfishesSouth America813
AstroblepidaeNaked suckermouth or climbing catfishesSouth America or Panama54
DiplomystidaeVelvet catfishesChile and Argentina6
ScoloplacidaeSpiny dwarf catfishesSouth America5
Siluroidei
IctaluridaeBullhead catfishesNorth America (Canada to Guatemala)51
Bagridaenaked or bagrid catfishAfrica and Asia: Lake Tanganyika210
CranoglanididaeArmorhead catfishesChina and Vietnam5
SiluridaeSheatfishesEurope and Asia97
PangasiidaeShark catfishesAsia and South East Asia28
AmblycipitidaeTorrent catfishesSouth Asia33
AmphiliidaeLoach catfishesAfrica80
AkysidaeStream catfishesSouth East Asia57
SisoridaeHill-stream catfishesSouth Asia218
ClariidaeAir-breathing or walking catfishesAfrica and South East Asia111
ChacidaeSquarehead, frogmouth, or angler catfishesSouth East Asia3
LacantuniidaeChiapas catfishMexico1
MalapteruridaeElectric catfishesAfrica19
MochokidaeSqueaker or upside-down catfishesAfrica (Lake Tanganyika)204
AriidaeSea catfishesAustralia, Papua New Guinea, tropical and temperate continental shelves, including Africa.15
DoradidaeThorny or talking catfishesSouth America88
AuchenipteridaeDriftwood catfishesSouth America and Panama105
AspredinidaeBanjo catfishesSouth America39
PlotosidaeEel tail or tandan catfishesIndo Pacific, Australia, New Guinea40
PimelodidaeLong-whiskered catfishesSouth America, Panama107
CetopsidaeWhale catfishesSouth America42
AnchariidaeMadagascar catfishesMadagascar6

Table 1.

Families of Catfish with the number of valid species in each family.

Two orders are recognized for catfishes globally: Loricaroidei and Siluroidei. Adopted from [1].

FamilySpeciesDistributionReferences
Bagridae (Bagrid catfishes)Black Nile catfish, Bagrus bajad (Forskkal 1775)Lake Turkana[12]
Lakes Chad, Albert, Turkana[13]
Rivers Nile, Niger, and Senegal[13]
Sudan catfish, Bagrus docmak (Forskkal, 1775)Lake Turkana[12]
Lake Victoria and mouths of major tributaries: Nyando, Sondu, Mara, Nzoia, and Yala[14]
Somalia catfish, Bagrus urostigma (Vinciguerra, 1895)Northern Ewaso Nyiro, Lower reaches of Coastal Rivers (Sabaki, Tana), Athi river[12, 14]
Bagrus meridionalisLake Malawi[15]
Claroteidae (Clarotid catfishes)Giraffe catfish, Auchenoglanis occidentalisLake Turkana[12, 14]
Congo River (DRC)[16]
Golden Nile catfish, Chrysichthys auratus (Geoffroy Saint Hilaire, 1809)Lake Turkana[12, 14]
Bagrid catfish, Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus (Lacepede, 1803)Tropical freshwaters of Mauritania, Senegal, Angola, and Lower Congo River (DRC)[17]
Lake Tanganyika[18]
Wideheaded Catfish, Clarotes laticeps (Rüppell, 1829)Ewaso Nyiro North, Galana-Sabaki (Tsavo drainage), Lower Tana River, Dawa River (Juba)[12, 14]
Somalian giant catfish Pardiglanis tarabinii (Poll, Lanza & Sassi, 1972)Lower Tana River
Juba system in Somalia[19]
Schilbeidae (Butter or Glass catfishes)Somalia glass catfish Parailia somalensis (Vinciguerra, 1897)Lower Tana River at Hola[12, 14, 20]
Silver catfish, Butter Catfish, Schilbe intermedius (Rüppell, 1832)Galana-Sabaki, Lower Tana, Northern Ewaso Nyiro, Dawa River (Juba system)[12, 14]
Lake Victoria and its major tributaries such as Sondu, Nyando, Yala, Mara, and
Lake Tanganyika[21]
Egyptian Butter catfish Schilbe uranoscopus (Rüppell, 1832)Lake Turkana, Turkwell River at Katilo[12, 14]
Schilbe durinii (Gianferrari, 1932)Lake Tanganyika[21]
Amphiliidae (Mountain catfishes)Marbled Mountain catfish, Amphilius jacksonii (Boulenger, 1912)Lake Victoria drainage (affluent rivers: Nzoia, Yala, Nyando, Sondu, Mara, and their tributaries, Streams of Kakamega forest, Sio, etc)[12, 14]
Lake Tanganyika[21]
Stargazer Mountain catfish, Amphilius uranoscopus (Pfeffer, 1889)Southern Ewaso Nyiro drainage, Pangani drainage, Athi and Tana River systems, Nairobi stream, Lake Victoria basin (affluent rivers)[12, 14]
Headwater streams of Mt Kenya, Aberdares, and Taita Hills[22]
Widespread in headwater streams across East and Central Africa: Pongolo River in Natal, Okavango delta and the Zambezi drainage, east coast rivers of Northern Natal
Streams in Ethiopia and Tanzania[23]
Lake Tanganyika[21]
Amphilius kivuensis (Pellegrin, 1933)Lake Tanganyika
Amphilius pedunculus (Thomson & Page, 2015)Lake Tanganyika
Amphilius ruziziensis (Thomson & Page, 2015)Lake Tanganyika
Sand catlet, Leptoglanis aff. rotundiceps (Hilgendorf, 1905)Lake Victoria drainage (affluent rivers), esp Nzoia, Kuja-Migori[12, 14]
Clariidae (Air breathing catfishes or African catfishes)Victoria snake catfish, Clariallabes petricola (Greenwood, 1956)Lake Victoria drainage: the lake itself and lower reaches of affluent rivers
Alluaud’s catfish, Clarias alluaudi (Boulenger, 1906)Lake Victoria drainage
African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)Lake Victoria drainage, Lake Kanyaboli, Pan African distribution
Lake Turkana system
Suguta River
Lake Bogoria drainage, Lake Baringo system,
eastward flowing river basins (Tana, Athi, …)
Northern and Southern Ewaso Nyiro Rivers,
Dawa River (Juba system)
Smoothhead catfish, Clarias liocephalus (Boulenger, 1898)Lake Victoria basin, including the lake itself and all affluent rivers
Lake Kanyaboli
Nairobi dam (Upper Athi River) where it was probably introduced
Werner’s catfish, Clarias werneri (Boulenger, 1906)Lake Victoria basin
Vundu, Heterobranchus longifilis (Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1840)Lake Turkana, middle Omo River
Lake Victoria deep water catfish, Xenoclarias eupogon (Norman, 1928)Endemic to Lake Victoria drainage
Bathyclarias euryodon (Jackson, 1959)Lake Malawi[6]
Bathyclarias gigasLake Malawi
Bathyclarias ilesi
Bathclarias longibarbis
Bathyclarias nyaensis
Bathyclarias rotundifrons
Bathyclarias Worthington
Dinotopterus cunningtoniLake Tanganyika[21]
Tanganikallabes mortiauxi (Poll, 1943)Lake Tanganyika[21]
[24]
Tanganikallabes alboperca (Wright & Bailey, 2012)Lake Tanganyika
Tanganikallabes stewarti (Wright & Bailey, 2012)Lake Tanganyika
Pseudotanganikallabes prognatha (Wright, 2017)Lake Tanganyika[21]
Malapteridae (Electric catfishes)Electric catfish Malapterurus electricus (Gmelin, 1789)Lake Turkana, Turkwell River; Omo system, and Malagarasi River in western Tanzania[12, 14]
Ariidae (Sea catfishes)African Sea catfish, Arius africanus (Playfair & Günther,1866)Lower courses of Sabaki and Tana Rivers; coastal species
Mochokidae (Squeakers and Suckermouths)Short barbelled suckermouth, Chiloglanis brevibarbis (Boulenger, 1902)Athi and Tana River systems
Pangani Suckermouth, Chiloglanis deckenii Peters, 1868Pangani drainage, including Lumi River
Kerio suckermouth Chiloglanis spec. “Kerio” or Chiloglanis niloticus (Boulenger, 1900)Kerio River system (Lake Turkana drainage)
Chanler Falls suckermouth, Chiloglanis spec. “Northern Ewaso Nyiro”Northern Ewaso Nyiro (below Chanler Falls)
Someren’s Whitehead, Chiloglanis somereni (Whitehead, 1958)Lake Victoria drainage (affluent rivers), esp. tributaries Waroya of Nzoia, Nyerere and Indigo of Yala, and Migori of Kuja, as well as the Mara River system. Mainly riverine species.
Dwarf Nile catfish, Mochokus niloticus (De Joannis, 1835)Lake Turkana system
Marbled Victoria Squeaker, Synodontis afrofischeri Hilgendorf, 1888Lake Victoria drainage: Lakes Sare and Victoria, Affluent rivers
Sudan Squeaker, Synodontis frontosus (Vaillant, 1895)Lake Turkana system
Geledi squeaker, Synodontis geledensis (Günther, 1896)Northern Ewaso Nyiro system, near Lorian swamp
Feather-barbelled squeaker, Synodontis manni (De Vos, 2001)Lower Tana River
Nile squeaker, Synodontis schall (Schneider in Bloch & Schneider, 1801)Lake Turkana
Tana squeaker, Synodontis serpentis (Whitehead, 1962)Galana-Sabaki and lower Tana River systems
Lake Victoria squeaker, Synodontis victoriae (Boulenger, 1906)Lake Victoria drainage
East coast squeaker, Synodontis zanzibaricus (Peters, 1868)Pangani drainage, Galana-Sabaki, Lower Tana River, Northern Ewaso Nyiro system
Ocellated Tana squeaker, Synodontis spec. “Lower Tana”Lower Tana drainage
Synodontis njassaeLake Malawi[15]
Synodontis greshoffi (Schilthuis, 1891)Congo River Basin[25]
Clown Squeaker, Synodontis decorus (Boulenger, 1899)Lake Tanganyika[21]
[26]
Synodontis dhonti (Boulenger, 1917)
Synodontis grandiops (Wright & Page, 2006)
Synodontis granulosus (Boulenger, 1900)
Synodontis ilebrevis (Wright & Page, 2006)
Synodontis irsacae (Matthes, 1959)
Synodontis lucipinnis (Wright & Page, 2006)
Synodontis multipunctatus (Boulenger, 1898)
Blackspotted squeaker, Synodontis nigromaculatus (Boulenger, 1905)
Cuckoo catfish, Synodontis petricola (Matthes, 1959)
Synodontis polli (Gosse, 1982)
Synodontis tanganyicae (Borodin, 1936)
Pangasiidae (Migratory catfishes)Pangasius djambal (Bleeker, 1846)Jambi, Batang Hari, Sumatra, Indonesia
Barito, Central Borneo, Indonesia
[27]
Pangasius rheophilus (Pouyaud & Teugels, 2000)Tanjung Selor, Kayan, Bulungan, East Borneo, Indonesia
Tanjung Redep, Berau, Bulungan, East Borneo, Indonesia
Basa catfish, Pangasius bocourti (Sauvage, 1880)Mekong River, Vietnam
Pangasius nasutus (Bleeker, 1863)Musi, Sumatra, Indonesia
Palangkaraya, Kahayan, Central Borneo, Indonesia
Kapuas, West Borneo, Indonesia
Pangasius conchophilus (Roberts & Vidthayanon, 1991)Mekong River, Vietnam
Black ear catfish, Pangasius larnaudii (Bocourt, 1866)Chau Doc, Mekong basin, Vietnam
Pangasius sanitwongsei (Smith, 1931)Chau Doc, Mekong basin, Vietnam
Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton, 1822)Chandpur, Ganges, Bangladesh
Pangasius krempfi (Fang & Chaux, 1949)Mekong River, Vietnam
Pangasius kunyit (Pouyaud et al., 1999)Sanga-sanga, Mahakam, East Borneo, Indonesia
Pontianak, Kapuas, West Borneo, Indonesia
Barito, Central Borneo, Indonesia
Kinabatangan, Sabah, North Borneo, Malaysia
Mekong River, Vietnam
Pangasius polyuranodon (Bleeker, 1852)Jambi, Batang Hari, Sumatra, Indonesia
Barito, Central Borneo, Indonesia
Kapuas, West Borneo, Indonesia
Batang Rajang, Sarawak, North Borneo, Malaysia
Sarawak, North Borneo, Malaysia
Mahakam, East Borneo, Indonesia
Mekong River, Vietnam
Pangasius macronema (Bleeker, 1851)Mekong River, Vietnam
Pangasius humeralis (Roberts, 1989)Sintang, Kapuas, West Borneo, Indonesia
Pangasius lithostoma (Roberts, 1989)Sintang, Kapuas, West Borneo, Indonesia
Pangasius kinabatanganensis (Roberts & Vidthayanon, 1991)Sukau, Kinabatangan, Sabah, North Borneo, Malaysia
Pangasius nieuwenhuisii (Popta, 1904)Mahakam, East Borneo, Indonesia
Striped (Tra/Sutchi) catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage 1878)Mekong River, Vietnam
Mekong giant catfish, Pangasianodon gigas (Chevey, 1930)Mekong River, Thailand
Pteropangasius micronemus (Bleeker, 1847)Batang Hari, Sumatra, Indonesia
Indragiri, Sumatra, Indonesia
Jombang, East Java, Indonesia
Sibu, Batang Rajang, Sarawak, Malaysia
Pteropangasius pleurotaenia (Sauvage, 1878)Chao Phraya, Thailand
Helicophagus typus (Bleeker, 1858)Jambi, Batang Hari, Sumatra, Indonesia
Helicophagus leptorhynchus (Ng & Kottelat, 2000)Mekong River, Laos
Ictaluridae (Bullhead catfishes)Blue catfish, Ictalurus furcatusNorth America, widely translocated outside its native range[28]
Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Jordan, 1905)Western North America, New Zealand,
Brown catfish, Ictalurus nebulosus (Gill, 1906)

Table 2.

Families of catfishes, common species per family and their distribution. Although not complete, this table captures the diversity of catfishes, and where each species is distributed globally.

Advertisement

2. Diversity and distribution of catfishes

Advertisement

3. Contribution of catfishes to food security in Africa

According to [29], a total of 27 catfish species were farmed in 86 countries worldwide in 2017, with a total production of 5, 518 878 tonnes, worth US$10, 569 972 billion of farm gate value. A large percentage of this production is from Pangasiid and Clariid catfishes, which contributed 51% and 24%, respectively, to the total annual production [29], which represents diversity and resilience of these two groups. The Mekong river harbors up to 16 species of Pangasius, grouped into 4 genera of Helicophagus, Pangasianodon, Pangasius, and Pteropangasius [30]. However, only 2 species are farmed in the river-based capture aquaculture: the river catfish (or sutchi or tra catfish) (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) and Bocourt’s catfish (Pangasius bocourti) [31]. Of these species, P. hypophthalmus is the most commonly cultured species, due to its higher fecundity, which occurs mainly at the surface, therefore, its larvae are easily caught for seeds [32] and exploit diverse food resources [33]. The culture of P. hypophthalmus in the Mekong delta of Vietnam grew at an average annual rate of 37% between 1997 and 2008, reaching a total annual tonnage of 1.4 million tonnes in 2009 [34], with an export turnover worth US$1.85 billion in 2011. This rapid increase in production of Vietnamese farmed Pangasius, an iconic industry directly employing over 180,000 people, was fueled by high and expanding market demand in over 100 countries, especially in the USA and Europe [34]. Despite adverse media reports of possible poison levels in Pangasius imports from Vietnam, demand for these fish products skyrocketed, buoyed by favorable reports of risk assessment and management, through toxicological risk surveys [35] (Table 3).

DateTransformation
1940–1950Tra catfish cultured in small family ponds, using natural seeds collected from the Mekong and its tributaries. Farming is concentrated in An Giang and Dong Thap provinces, upstream of the Mekong River Delta in Vietnam
1981–1982First trials of tra catfish intensive culture in small ponds in Can Tho city using wild-caught fingerlings
1996–1999Intensive culture of tra catfish in ponds, and expanded gradually to other provinces.
First trials of tra catfish culture in cages (replacement of basa catfish) and pens were also conducted.
Both production systems used wild and hatchery-reared fingerlings
2000–2004Tra catfish intensive culture in cages and ponds expanded rapidly.
Hatchery-reared fingerlings met the demand for stocking.
Productivity was significantly improved.
Farmers gradually shifted from homemade feeds to commercial feeds
2005 to presentCollapse of tra catfish cage and pen culture occurred.
Significant improvements to pond culture techniques and marked increases in productivity.
Introduction of sustainable production standards such as SQF-1000, AquaGAP, GlobalGAP, and BMPs.

Table 3.

Historical transformation of the Vietnamese striped catfish farming in the Mekong.

These measures significantly spurred production, raising the industry from artisanal to a commercial export-oriented one, supplying over 100 countries globally. Source: [36].

With current production of cultured P. hypophthalmus in Vietnam equivalent to 65% of European aquaculture production [37], the industry provides a microcosm of what production efforts for related species need to be put in place to spur production. Starting as a small-scale backyard activity, farmers grew the fish in ponds, with limited input and harvests [38]. This transitioned to the use of pens and cages in the Mekong, with use of poor-quality seeds caught from natural aquatic systems, especially from the Cambodian waters of the confluence of the Mekong, Bassac, and Tonle Sap Rivers [39]. However, with the ban on the collection of natural seed stocks for the species by Cambodian authorities in 1994 [40], production declined slightly, but this challenge in seed availability stimulated a focus on seed production technology. Similarly, challenges associated with water flow under cages led to a transition to pond culture along the lower reaches of the Mekong. This, infused with technological improvements in the artificial propagation of seeds, vertical integration of the pond farming systems, and processing of the final product, significantly transformed production between 1997 and 2007 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Total tonnage of farmed Pangasianodon hypophthalmus produced and exported in Vietnam, from 1997 to 2010. Source: [38].

Therefore, although a majority of the farmers were small-scale, with up to 81.9% of the 5,393 farms being less than 1 ha in size, high production was still achieved and maintained (Figure 2) [38].

Figure 2.

Annual production of farmed striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in Vietnam 2010 to 2019, the lead global producer of farmed Pangasiid catfishes. Annual production steadied from 2010 to 2019, mainly because of commitment of farmers and an expanded export market for the product. Source: [41].

3.1 Factors contributing to a rise in farmed Vietnamese striped catfish in the Mekong

The production units were vertically integrated, with seed production, fry production, fry to fingerling, and grow-out units being distinct, in different locations and setups. This ensured specialized labor and effort (cluster of operations) increased efficiency of the sector and effective dissemination of technology to farmers [38]. Similarly, special attention was given to seed production and broodstock management at hatcheries. The major technique that revolutionized the sector was the development of artificial propagation of tra catfish seeds [42], and the dissemination of the technology to all hatcheries in the Mekong. This ensured the availability of adequate high-quality seeds for the enterprises, following the ban on collection of natural seed stocks in the Mekong. Apart from this, a large number of hatcheries were developed, ranging from small-scale or back yard to commercial scale or large establishments (0.2 to 15 ha) [43]. There were 93 hatcheries for tra catfish in the Mekong delta, producing up to 818.3 million hatchlings annually under optimal operations of 29 cycles of fry production annually [44]. Many hatcheries maintained a large number of broodstock (up to 29,200) so the frequency of reusing a brooder was very low [38]. This reduced the rate of inbreeding and genetic drift, two processes that often negatively impact quality of seeds or fry, and this consequently improved the quality of the seed. Many hatcheries also replace their brood stock frequently [43], with stocks from their own extensive farms, neighboring grow-out farms, or from natural sources [38, 43]. Continuous improvement of seed quality is undertaken, for instance through selective breeding program for the species that has been initiated [45]. Feeding regimes in nursery units are also quite improved, ranging from recommended practices of live feeds such as Moina, or other such natural feeds for larvae, to commercial diets for fingerlings. The feeding ration was 5 to 18% body weight at a frequency of 4 to 8 times daily [43]. Grow-out systems were mainly operated by small-scale farmers (72%) [46], comprising deep ponds averaging 2.0 to 6.0 m, with a water depth of 3.5–4.5 m, with a high stocking density of 18 to 125 fish m–2 depending on seed availability and financial ability of farmers. Average yields ranged from 70.0 to 850 t ha−1 crop−1, although the pond area and productivity per unit area have been increasing since 2000 [46].

Growth in the production of P. hypophthalmus was also boosted by export-oriented markets, with the USA being the main market in the 1990s. Increasing imports of tra catfish to the USA were boosted by the admission of Vietnam to the Asia Pacific Economic Consortium (APEC) block, and the dropping of tariffs on raw seafood [47]. The increased imports of tra catfish affected markets of the local ictalurid catfish and occasioned trade restrictions via new laws against tra catfish and renegotiation of bilateral agreements against the species [48]. These restrictions were worsened by negative internet and media campaigns against striped catfish industry of Vietnam [49]. However, with the explosion in the production of striped catfish in the 2000s, export market diversified, to about 136 countries between 2002 to 2008 [38], with the European Union being the major market [38]. This phenomenal growth occurred despite trade restrictions by the USA due to negative publicity about Pangasius. Expanding export markets was due to deliberate efforts by Vietnamese authorities to promote production while exploring alternative markets. Some of these efforts included: certification of groups of small-scale operators. Certification is a procedure by which a certification body gives written or equivalent assurance that a product, process, or service conforms to specified requirements and is carried out by competent and accredited body [38] (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Global Production of farmed striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus 2010–2018. Intensification of production and use of technology, high-quality seeds produced from hatcheries' commercial diets, and processing of the product using global quality control systems commercialized the industry. Global production was averaging 2.4 million tons, from China, Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar, Lao PDR, Vietnam, and Bangladesh. A large proportion of this came from Vietnam, with many farmers utilizing the large Mekong delta of Vietnam. Source [41].

Certification is important as it ensures that food quality and safety are achieved with respect to internationally traded food commodities and that the production systems comply to accepted norms and are socially responsible. Similarly, certification of a product ensures that farming systems have minimal environmental impact and that the production systems are sustainable. Certification also assures markets (buyers, retailers, and consumers) that the fisheries products are safe to consume and originate from aquaculture farms or capture fisheries adopting responsible management practices [38].

Certification of tra catfish farmers, therefore, assured the international market of the safety and quality of the product, and the confidence associated with this spurred demand for the product. Related to marketing of the product, the Vietnamese Government adopted negotiation with organizations such as the WWF, to address the biased negative publicity against tra catfish, and the WWF removed the species from its red list of endangered species. Similarly, Government encouraged farmers to adopt BMPs, cluster management approaches, and compliance to responsible farming practices to deter future problems. Due to the very marginal profits made across the tra catfish value chain, improved processing operations increased efficiency of processing, so that a relatively small amount of fish was required to produce 1 kg of processed fish. Production was also sustained by increased turnover or high production by farmers, exploiting the benefits of economy or scale of production [38]. This was further boosted by authorities implementing the guaranteed price scheme at each link of the value chain, to cushion operators against large fluctuations in prices [50]. Generally, there was deliberate action to maintain a suitable quality of the product, with desirable nutritional profile, as well as low content of pollutants, such as mercury, organochlorine pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls, consistent with the European rapid alert notification system [38]. Such actions included reduced use of veterinary drugs and other restricted or banned chemicals in the value chain of the fish by farmers and other operators, in compliance with food quality and food safety regulations.

Despite the rapid explosion of tra catfish culture in the Mekong, the industry has had very minimal environmental impacts on the Mekong ecosystem [38]. This is because only 2% of the waters of the Mekong pass through the ponds, and therefore the impact of aquaculture on the water quality of the river is minimal since sedimentation, mineralization, and infiltration occur in the ponds [51]. Further limitation of environmental impacts is achieved through the use of sludge from ponds as fertilizer for rice paddies, which helps to achieve environmental and economic sustainability for the farmers [52]. Similarly, hatchery-reared stocks of tra catfish have not impacted natural populations of the species and related fishes in the Mekong, through hybridization from escapees [53].

3.2 The Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818)

The channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) is a member of the family Ictaluridae in the order Siluriformes. The native range of the Channel catfish or the North American Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, is the southern Canadian Prairie Provinces south to the Gulf States, west to the Rocky Mountains, and east to the Appalachian Mountains [54]. Further, it extends to St. Lawrence River and its tributaries from southern Quebec through to Ontario including the Ottawa River and its tributaries, all the Great Lakes except Lake Superior, in southwestern Ontario and the southern part of Manitoba (Figure 4). This extends to Susquehanna River and the Florida Peninsular. However, the fish has been introduced in Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina, and in most of the USA, including the Pacific and Atlantic drainages [54]. It is also widely introduced in Europe, Japan, and China (Figure 4). Its large size and excellent taste make it a popular target of anglers. Its high fecundity, tolerance to extreme environmental conditions, and resistance to diseases make it an excellent species for commercial cultivation.

Figure 4.

Global distribution of the North American Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Countries culturing Ictalurus punctatus are shown in orange color. Source: [55].

The congener, Blue catfish, I. furcatus, and the hybrid between I. punctatus * I. furcatus, are also important in culture [56], and the three contribute to more than 60% of total aquaculture production in the USA, especially in the southern states of Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Alabama [57]. The US catfish industry peaked in 2003, but declined later, in part due to competition from the Vietnamese catfish imports.

Sizeable fingerlings are stocked in fertilized ponds. During growth, fish of bigger size are intermittently harvested for market, and an equal number of fingerlings is added to ponds to replace the harvested fish. Therefore, multiple-batch production is often adopted, although fish grow faster in single-batch stocking [58]. So a pond often has fish of different sizes, and cropping for market is frequently carried out, to supply the market steadily, and also control flooding the market with fish and negatively affect fish prices [55]. This is maintained for several years, without draining ponds. Initial feeding ration is about 50% body weight, which is reduced gradually, to 3–4% body weight. However, water quality in ponds is monitored frequently, and aeration of water is carried out, to ensure the fish under high stocking density do not suffer stress, disease outbreaks, and mortality. Apart from ponds, fishes are also reared in cages, raceways, and tanks (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Annual average global production of farmed Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus from 1980 to 2010. Source: [29].

3.3 The Culture of Channel Catfish in China

The Channel catfish, I. punctatus was introduced to China from the USA in 1984, and successful artificial propagation was achieved in 1997, to support seed production for commercial culture. Rapid growth in the culture of the species in the country was recorded, due to several factors. Domestic consumption of the species reached 130,000 tons in 2013, of which 120,000 tones were fresh fish while 10,000 tones were processed [59]. The culture of the species has led to the growth of associate industries, strengthening synergies in the sector. For instance, due to the high demand for Channel catfish in many provinces of China, companies such as the Gaobazhou Aquatic Products processing company, promote value addition to the fish products, boosting sales, while simultaneously creating employment opportunities for locals [60] (Figure 6 and Table 4).

Figure 6.

Annual Farmed Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus production in China, 2003 to 2010. Source: [61]. There was a rapid increase in production between 2005 to 2013, because of artificial propagation of seeds, and improvement in quality of seeds and strains used by farmers.

PhaseTimeDevelopments/Milestones
I1984–1997Artificial propagation techniques developed and successfully applied
rapid spread of the culture of the species in China
Use of ponds tried and perfected
Optimization and production of quality feed for cultured fish
Annual production of the species is less than 10,000 tones, mainly concentrated in Hubei and Guangdong Provinces
Fish marketed live, with high prices due to low production
II1998–2003Onset of development of Channel catfish industry in China
Use of cages to grow fish introduced
Improved breeding techniques
Developing nutritionally optimal feeds
Adoption of best management practices
Improved control of quality and marketing of the product
Export of produce to the USA successfully accomplished: 326 tons in 2003
Annual production rose to 45,500 tones in 2003
Fish marketed mainly as fresh produce
III2004–2009Industrialization of Channel catfish production in China
Wider spread of culture of Channel catfish in China
Rapid expansion in annual yield of the species, reaching 224,500 t in 2008
Processing plants were built in many provinces: Hunan, Jiangsu, Shandong, Guangdong, Hubei, and Guangxi provinces among others.
Increased export of frozen fish to the USA, reaching 17,000 tons in 2008.
IV2010 to dateStability in Chinese Channel catfish industry
High cost of processing raw fish, with reduced yields and market demand
A drop in exports, with only 6,568 tons of fish exported in 2011.
A decline in annual total production, with 205,000 tons in 2011.
Fluctuating prices of fish on domestic markets
Increased market demand, pushing up prices for the product
High demand has stimulated industrial recovery of the sector, with high annual yields of 247,399 tons in 2013.

Table 4.

Historical milestones in the growth of the Channel catfish culture in China.

Source: [62].

3.4 Seed production to support the expansion of Channel catfish culture in China

Following the importation of I. punctatus to China in the 1980s, artificial production was successfully initiated and perfected, assuring the sector of sufficient seed production. However, production of adequate amounts of quality seed was affected by degradation of germplasm quality, inbreeding, variation of germplasm, reduced growth rates of fry, and increased incidence of diseases [60]. In order to address these challenges, Government authorities established the National Channel Catfish improved variety bases in Sichuan, Hubei, and Anhui, to undertake breeding schemes for improved varieties of I. punctatus for culture [60]. The result of these efforts was the development of improved strain of catfish named the Jiang Feng No. 1 [60], whose growth rate is 22.1 to 25.3% greater than that of any other strain [60]. Later, 2 improved lines were developed by screening different populations for economic gain and growth performance, using the Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) method. This led to the development of two hybrid lines with high growth rates, resistance to diseases, and survival. Further research on this focuses on identifying populations of high genetic variation and quantitative trait locus (QTL) of economic interest, to develop superior strains for use by farmers [63]. In line with these, fish seed breeding centers, together with other hatcheries for farmers adopted best management practices, especially focusing on managing quality of broodstock. Most hatcheries maintain a large number of brood fish, ranging from 30,000 to 50,000. This is necessary because a large sample size from which breeding pairs of fish are drawn maintains high genetic variation that positively impacts seed quality. Due to these improvements, seed production for Channel catfish farmers reached 800,000,000 to 1 billion, and rose to 1.5 billion fry in 2013 [60], helping to spur a vibrant culture industry for the species.

3.5 The culture of African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)

While the different families of catfishes are widely distributed in natural aquatic ecosystems in Africa and are landed from fisheries by local fishermen, the African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus is the most commonly exploited species. There are 58 species of Clarias, of which 33 are in Africa, while 25 are distributed in Asia [21, 64]. In Africa, apart from C. gariepinus, C. anguillaris and Heterobrachus longifilis are also common in aquaculture, although these 2 are of restricted distribution [64], mainly in the Nile and West Africa. Other non-Clarias clariid catfish genera in Africa include Bathyclarias (in Lake Malawi) and Gymnallabes typus (in the lower Niger River and Cross River basin of Nigeria and Cameroon).

A systematic revision of 120 nominal species of Clarias by Teugels reduced these to only 32 valid species [65]. In a related study, Teugels [66] documented 74 species of African clariid catfishes within 12 genera. The description of two species of Xenoclarias as Clarias eupogon (Norman, 1928) and Xenoclarias holobranchus (Greenwood, 1958) was changed to Xenoclarias eupogon (Gee, 1975) using more samples, as a monotypic genus. Similarly, three clariid genera, Clarias, Clariallabes, and Heterobranchus occur in Southern Africa [67], with Clarias having 6 species, while Clariallabes and Heterobranchus have a single species each [67]. In Southern Africa, a total of six Clarias species exist: Clarias gariepinus, C. liocephalus, C. cavernicola, C. theodorae, C. stappersii, and C. ngamensis [67]. On the other hand, six Clarias species inhabit Central Africa: C. gariepinus, C. platycephalus, C. camerunensis, C. gabonensis, C. buthupogon, and C. angolensis [68]. In lower Guinea, a total of 13 Clarias species are documented, including C. gariepinus, C. anguillaris, C. agboyiensis, C. gabonensis, C. buthupogon, C. angolensis, C. pachynema, C. submarginatus, C. platycephalus, C. maclaroni, C. ajensis, C. longior, and C. camerunensis [69]. Similarly, several Clarias species exist in Lake Victoria and its influent rivers in East Africa. Apart from C. gariepinus, several species including C. liocephalus (Boulenger 1898), C. alluaudi (Boulenger 1898), C. theodorae (Weber 1897), C. werneri (Boulenger 1906), and Xenoclarias also abound [70].

In Asia, 3 Asian clariid catfish species are used in aquaculture: Clarias batrachus (Linnaeus, 1758) in India [71], C. macrocephalus in South-East Asia [72], and C. fuscus (Lacep’de, 1803) in Taiwan and Hawaii [73]. Clarias batrachus also inhabits Southern Thailand in Malay Peninsula, Mekong, and Chaophraya River basins. Clarias magur (Hamilton, 1822) is also present in the Malay Peninsula and India, while C. nieuhofii (Valenciennes, 1840) inhabits South East Asia, successfully tried as an aquaculture species [74].

While these descriptions may not be quite accurate and require urgent revisions, they illustrate the diversity of Clarias, which is often unrecognized and undescribed, yet extremely important as biodiversity for local economies, and food resources for local communities. Similarly, some of these clariid species could be useful aquaculture candidates, to help overcome some of the challenges of C. gariepinus as a farmed species. From the diversity of clariid catfishes, it is also clear that there are two groups: the large and small-sized Clarias species. The large Clarias is represented by C. gariepinus, while the small group includes most other species across different regions of Africa. Clarias gariepinus has been widely translocated, at least in 35 countries, mainly for culture [64]. These translocations often ignore existing laws that ban transfer of fish across drainage basins [75] and pose risk to existing native stocks or species, due to hybridization. Examples of hybridization between different Clarias species include C. anguillaris*C. gariepinus in Nigeria [76] and a hybrid of C. macrocephalus (better taste and culinary attributes) *C. gariepinus (faster growth and higher resistance to diseases). This hybrid is the main fish stocked for culture, because of faster growth and higher resistance to diseases, with its product valued at over US$100 million in Thailand [77]. The introduction of C. batrachus and C. macrocephalus from Thailand to China, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Hong Kong led to the loss of endemic cyprinids from Lake Lanao, Mindanao due to predation and the displacement of native C. macrocephalus from Luzon [64]. Introgression of alleles from this hybrid into the genome of natural population of C. macrocephalus devalues the natural genetic resource of C. macrocephalus [78] and also causes decline in the natural stocks of C. batrachus (Figure 7) [79].

Figure 7.

The main ichthyological provinces of Africa (Adopted from [80]. Except the Maghreb, Karoo and Cape, Clarias gariepinus is widely distributed in the rest of the Provinces on the continent.

3.6 Challenges facing the culture of Clarias gariepinus in Africa

Although it is well recognized as a suitable fish species for aquaculture to meet food security, income generation, and livelihoods for local communities in Africa, annual cultured production of the species is low. FAO estimates that average production for farmed clariid catfishes was over.

300,000 tons, which was valued at nearly US$400 million in 2006 [77]. Total production of C. gariepinus, the main farmed clariid catfish species, averages 200,000 tons in 2014 [41] (Figure 8). Diverse efforts to increase average production in many countries of Africa have not yielded much fruit, despite ample supplies of water, land, labor, and technical know-how, as well as diverse populations of natural germplasm (Figure 7).

Figure 8.

Annual production of Farmed Clarias gariepinus in Africa, 2000 to 2014. Most of the production is from 3 countries (Nigeria, Uganda, and Ghana), as the lead producers on the continent, with most countries producing insignificant amounts of catfish annually. Source: [41].

The main challenge stifling the culture of C. gariepinus is poor survival of fry or larvae [81]. This reduces the quantity of fry produced by farmers at hatcheries, negatively impacting seed availability and supply for commercial aquaculture ventures. In East Africa, Clarias fingerlings have taken on an even bigger role and importance, being used as live baits for catching Nile perch and Lates niloticus in the Lake Victoria long line fishery activities [82]. It is reported that a total of 3 million Clarias live baits are required daily by L. niloticus fishermen on Lake Victoria [83], a demand that creates enormous opportunities for Clarias farmers and hatchery operators to generate income and livelihoods. Despite this, the supply of fingerlings from hatcheries in East Africa is very low, forcing bait traders to exploit natural populations for fingerlings. Harvesting fingerlings from natural populations is not environmentally sustainable, with intermittent supply as availability is rain-dependent. This practice also exacerbates overexploitation of natural fish stocks, contrary to the need to conserve natural fisheries resources, especially for the Lake Victoria basin, whose endemic fish species already declined [84] due to many factors [82, 85]. Apart from endangering the health of fishermen who collect the fingerlings from the wild, this practice does not yield adequate numbers of fingerlings required quickly. It, therefore, involves a waste of time, and transport costs as fishermen have to venture into different parts of the lake, swamp, or river and spend many hours scouring different sites for catfish fingerlings. For sites within Lake Victoria, this task is especially complex and risky, due to dense mats of the water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes [86] that cover large areas of the lake.

In order to avoid these challenges and support the conservation of natural fisheries resources while simultaneously helping hatchery operators to generate income and livelihoods, artificial propagation of Clarias at hatcheries has been proposed and encouraged [85, 87, 88, 89]. However, despite the fact that artificial propagation of Clarias at hatcheries is well perfected, practiced, and documented, high mortality of Clarias fry at hatcheries still persists. In some hatcheries, mortality of more than 80% of hatchlings occurs, severely curtailing efforts of increasing seed availability for farmers. In some cases, the whole batch of incubated eggs fails to hatch, due to contamination with bacteria and fungi [90] in hatchery and egg incubation facilities. Over the last several decades, research efforts have concentrated on addressing poor survival of Clarias fry or fingerlings at hatcheries. These research efforts included studies on improving quality of diets for larval catfish [81, 91, 92, 93], expanding the range of Clarias production systems [94], control of bacteria and fungi in egg incubation units [95], as well as fry nursery units [96], and improving the choice of source population of brood stock used at hatcheries for propagation [88, 89], as well as management of elite lines of brood stock for seed production [86]. In this regard, hatchery managers and farmers need to understand that the use of poor quality broodstock of mixed ancestry or suffering low genetic variability yields seeds of poor quality [89] because of outbreeding depression that compromises the fitness of offspring [97]. Despite this suite of studies aimed at addressing the challenge of poor survival of Clarias fry or fingerlings, the problem is far from being comprehensively addressed, in order to achieve sufficient seed availability and supply. There is need to understudy seed production and supply in the farmed catfish industry of Asia, especially the Vietnamese striped catfish, P. hypophthalmus and the Chinese Channel catfish, I. punctatus. We suggest that future efforts in addressing seed quality and quantity in C. gariepinus aquaculture will have to focus on using improved strains. Techniques of improvement, such as selective breeding and genomic selection will need to be employed, and research in these fields need to be strengthened.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Eschmeyer WN, Fong JD. Species by Family/Subfamily in the Catalog of Fishes. San Francisco, USA: California Academy of Sciences; 2010
  2. 2. Dauda AB, Natrah I, Karim M, Kamarudin MS, Bichi AH. African Catfish Aquaculture in Malaysia and Nigeria: Status, Trends and Prospects. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal. 2018;9:237
  3. 3. Diogo R. Morphological Evolution, Adaptations, Homoplasies, Constraints and Evolutionary Trends. Catfishes as a Case on General Phylogeny and Macroevolution. NH: Science Publishers, Inc; 2005
  4. 4. Seegers L. The Catfishes of Africa: A Handbook for Identification and Maintenance. First English ed. Rodgau, Germany: Aqualog Verlag; 2008. p. 2008
  5. 5. Armbruster JW. Global Catfish Biodiversity. American Fisheries Society Symposium. 2011;77:15-37
  6. 6. Agnèse J-F, Teugels GG. The Bathyclarias–Clarias species Xock. A new model to understand rapid speciation in African Great Lakes. Comptes Rendus de l’ Académie des Sciences de Paris, Sciences de la vie. 2001;324:683-688
  7. 7. Fink SV, Fink WL. Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society. 1981;72(4):297-353
  8. 8. Greenwood PH. A revision of the genus Dinotopterus Blgr. (Pisces, Clariidae) with notes on the comparative anatomy of the supra-branchial organs in the Clariidae. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology). 1961;7:217-241
  9. 9. Olson KR, Munshi JSD, Ghosh TK, Ojha J. Vascular organization of the head and respiratory organs of the air-breathing catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis. Journal of Morphology. 1990;203:165-179
  10. 10. Teugels GG, Adriaens D. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Clariidae- an overview. In: Arratia G, Kapoor BG, Chardon M, Diogo R, editors. Enfield, USA: Science Publishers; 2003
  11. 11. Lowe-McConnel RH. Ecological Studies in Tropical Fish Communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1987
  12. 12. Okeyo, D. O. and Ojwang, W. A Photographic Guide to Freshwater Fishes of Kenya, Including Riverine Haplochromines. A Photographic Guide to Freshwater Fishes of Kenya. Grimsby, UK. 2015
  13. 13. FishBase, (2020). A Global Information System on Fishes. Available from: https://www.fishbase.de/home.htm
  14. 14. Seegers L, De Vos L, Okeyo OD. Annotated checklist of the Freshwater fishes of Kenya (excluding the lacustrine haplochromines from Lake Victoria). Journal of East African Natural History. 2003;92:11-47
  15. 15. Duponchelle F, Ribbink AJ, Msukwa A, Mafuka J, Mandere D. Seasonal and spatial patterns of experimental trawl catches in the southwest arm of Lake Malawi. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2003;29(Suppl 2):216-231
  16. 16. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & technical terms, 6E (2003). Bagridae. The McGraw- Hill companies.
  17. 17. FishBase. A Global Information System on Fishes. 2019. Available from: https://www.fishbase.de/home.htm
  18. 18. Lowe McConnell RH. Fish Faunas of the African Great Lakes: Origins, Diversity, and Vulnerability. Conservation Biology. 1993;7:634-643
  19. 19. De Vos L. Rediscovery of the giant catfish, Pardiglanis tarabinii (Siluriformes: Claroteidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters. 2001;12(3):213-214
  20. 20. Whitehead PJP. Note on a collection of fishes from the Tana River below Garissa, Kenya. East African Agricultural Journal. 1959;23(4):167-171
  21. 21. FishBase. A Global Information System on Fishes. 2009. Available from: https://www.fishbase.de/home.htm
  22. 22. Skelton PH. A Complete Guide to the Freshwater Fishes of Southern Africa. South Africa: Southern Book Publishers; 1993
  23. 23. Skelton PH. A systematic revision of species of the catfish genus Amphilius (Siluroidei, Amphiliidae) from east and southern Africa. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums Natural History. 1984;16(3):41-71
  24. 24. Wright JJ, Bailey RM. Systematic revision of the formerly monotypic genus Tanganikallabes (Siluriformes: Clariidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2012;2012(165):121-142
  25. 25. Moelants T. Synodontis greshoffi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN. 2010
  26. 26. Wright JJ, Page LM. Taxonomic revision of Lake Tanganyikan Synodontis (Siluriformes: Mochokidae). Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History. 2006;46(4):99-154
  27. 27. Pouyaud L, Gustiano R, Teugels GG. Contribution to the phylogeny of the Pangasiidae based on Mitochondrial 12S Rdna. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2004;5(2):45-62
  28. 28. Burgess WE. An Atlas of Freshwater and Marine Catfishes: A Preliminary Survey of the Siluriformes. Neptune City, New Jersey: T. F. H Publications; 1989
  29. 29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production 1950-2017. 2019
  30. 30. Gustiano R. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Pangasiidae Catfishes from Asia (Ostariophysi, Siluriformes). Leuven, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven; 2003
  31. 31. Trong TQ, Hao NV, Griffiths D. Status of Pangasiid aquaculture in Viet Nam. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission; 2002
  32. 32. Hortle KG, Chea T, Bun R, Em S, Thac P. Drift of fish juveniles and larvae and invertebrates over 24-hour periods in the Mekong River at Phnom Penh, Cambodia. In: Burnhill TJ, Hewit MM, editors. Proceedings of the 6th Technical Symposium on Mekong Fisheries, 26-28 November 2003. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission; 2005. pp. 19-33
  33. 33. Van Zalinge N, Lieng S, Ngor PB, Heng K, Valbo-Jørgensen J. Status of the Mekong Pangasianodon hypophthalmus Resources, with Special Reference to the Stock Shared between Cambodia and Viet Nam. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission; 2002
  34. 34. Trifkovic N. Certified standards and vertical coordination in aquaculture: The case of Pangasius from Vietnam. Aquaculture. 2014;433:235-246
  35. 35. Murk AJ, Ivonne MC, Rietjens M, Bush SR. Perceived versus real toxicological safety of Pangasius catfish: A review modifying market perspectives. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2018;10:123-134
  36. 36. Davy FB, Soto D, Bhat V, Umesh NR, Yucel-Gier G, Hough C, et al. (2011) Research, Communications, Training/Extension for Responsible Aquaculture. In: Subasinghe RP, De Silva SS, Bartley DM, Halwart M, Hishamunda N, Mohan CV, Sorgeloos P (eds) Farming the Waters for People and Food. FAO / NACA 2011. FAO, Rome.
  37. 37. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010. Rome: FAO; 2010
  38. 38. De Silva SS, Phuong NT, N. T. Striped catfish farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: A tumultuous path to a global success. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2011;3:45-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2011.01046.x
  39. 39. Nguyen TTT. Patterns of use and exchange of genetic resources of the striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage 1878). Reviews in Aquaculture. 2009;1:222-229
  40. 40. Ngor, P. B. (1999). Catfish fry collection in the Mekong River of Kandal and Phnom Penh. In: Van Zalinge N. P., Nao T., Deap, L. (eds) Present Status of Cambodia’s Freshwater Capture Fisheries and Management Implications. Pages 116–134. Mekong River Commission Secretariat and Department of Fisheries, Phnom Penh.
  41. 41. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Rome: FAO; 2020
  42. 42. Cacot P. Description of the sexual cycle related to the environment and set up of the artificial propagation in Pangasius bocourti (Sauvage, 1880) and P. hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) reared in floating cages and in ponds in the Mekong Delta. In: Legendre M, Pariselle A, editors. The Biological Diversity and Aquaculture of clariid and Pangasiid Catfishes in South East Asia. Cantho, Vietnam. 1999
  43. 43. Bui TM, Phan LT, Ingram BA, Nguyen TTT, Gooley GJ, Nguyen HV, et al. Seed production practices of striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in the Mekong Delta region, Vietnam. Aquaculture. 2010;306:92-100
  44. 44. Le XS, Le LH. Supply and use of catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) seed in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Aquaculture Asia Magazine XV. 2010;1:26-33
  45. 45. Hao NV, Sang NV, Khanh PV. Selective Breeding of Mekong Striped Catfish Pangasius hypophthalmus. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Fisheries; 2004
  46. 46. Phan LT, Bui TM, Nguyen TTT, Gooley GJ, Ingram BA, Nguyen HV, et al. Current status of farming practices of striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Aquaculture. 2009;296:227-236
  47. 47. Sengupta R. US–Vietnam Trade War over Seafood: Free Trade Not So Free after All. New Delhi, India: International Development Economics Associates (IDEAS). 2003
  48. 48. Kinnucan HW. Futility of targeted fish tariffs and an alternative. Marine Resource Economics. 2003;18:211-224
  49. 49. Urich M. WWF’s hatchet job on Pangasius. 2011. Seafood Source. Available from: https://doi/www.seafoodsource.com/newsarticledetail.aspx?id=9579
  50. 50. Hong T. In the Middle of Trouble. Vietnam: Tra and Basa; 2010. pp. 38-39
  51. 51. Bosma RH, Hanh CTT, Potting J. Environmental Impact Assessment of the Pangasius Sector in the Mekong Delta. Wageningen: Wageningen University; 2009
  52. 52. Phuong VC, Nguyen BP, Kim HT, Bell RW. Recycling of fishpond waste from rice cultivation in Cuu Long Delta, Vietnam. In: Nair J, Furedy C, Hoysala C, Doelle H, editors. Technologies and Management for Sustainable Biosystems. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2009. pp. 85-97
  53. 53. Ha HP, Nguyen TTT, Poompuang S, Na-Nakorn U. Microsatellites revealed no genetic differentiation between hatchery and contemporary wild populations of striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage 1878) in Vietnam. Aquaculture. 2009;291:154-160
  54. 54. Scott WB, Crossman EJ. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Bulletin. 1973;184:996
  55. 55. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). State of World Aquaculture 2006. Rome: FAO; 2006
  56. 56. Gosh K, Hanson TR, Drescher D, Bugg D, Dunham RA. Economic effect of hybrid catfish (channel catfish male x blue catfish female) growth variability on traditional and intensive production systems. North American Journal of Aquaculture. 2021;84:1-17
  57. 57. Xue X, Luo G, Li Y. US aquaculture development survey. China Fisheries. 2013;10:43-45
  58. 58. Tucker CS, Steeby JA, Waldrop JE, Garrard AB. Production characteristics and economic performance for four channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, pond stocking density-cropping system combinations. Journal of Applied Aquaculture. 1993;3:333-351
  59. 59. Xiao YH. The report of Channel catfish industry analysis in 2014. Oceans and Fisheries (Fisheries Frontiers). 2014;9:91-92
  60. 60. Li D, Xie C, He X, Qi C, Gao Y, Liang X. Channel catfish culture. In: Aquaculture in China: Success Stories and Modern Trends. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; 2018
  61. 61. China Fishery Statistical Yearbook. Ministry of Agriculture. Beijing: China Agriculture Press; 2014
  62. 62. Li L, Yan C, Xiao Y. Domestic market situation and industrial development of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). China Fisheries. 2012;9:35-36
  63. 63. National Fisheries Technology Extension Station. Phased acceptance assessment of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) joint breeding project was held in Nanjing. China Fisheries. 2011;9:18
  64. 64. Na-Nakorn U, Brummett R. Use and exchange of aquatic genetic resources for food and aquaculture: Clarias catfish. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2009;1:214-223
  65. 65. Teugels GG. A systematic revision of African species of the genus Clarias (Pisces, Clariidae). Annals of the Royal Museum for Central Africa. Paris, France: Scie. Zool. 1986a;247:1-199
  66. 66. Teugels GG. Clariidae. In: Daget J, Gosse JP, and DFE Thys Van Den Audenaerd (Eds.). Checklist of Freshwater Fishes of Africa. Paris, France. 1986b. pp. 66–101
  67. 67. Skelton PH, Teugels GG. A review of the Clariid catfishes occurring in Southern Africa. Review of Tropical Hydrobiology. 1991;24(3):241-260
  68. 68. Hanssens M. A review of Clarias species (Pisces, Siluriformes), from the lower Congo and the Pool Malebo. Journal of Afrotropical Zoology. 2009;5:27-40
  69. 69. Teugels GG, Adriaens D, Devaere S, Musschoot T. Clariidae. In: Stiassny MLJ, Teugels GG, Hopkins CD, editors. The Fresh and Brackish water fishes of Lower Guinea, West Central Africa. Paris: IRD; 2007. pp. 653-691
  70. 70. Mwita CJ, Ngwengulila G. Molecular phylogeny of the clariid fishes of Lake Victoria, Tanzania, inferred from cytochrome b DNA sequences. Journal of Fish Biology. 2008;73:1139-1148
  71. 71. Sahoo SK, Giri SS, Chandra SS, Mohapatra BC. Evaluation of breeding performance of Asian catfish Clarias batrachus at different dose of HCG and latency period combinations. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2008;8:249-251
  72. 72. Na-Nakorn U. Clarias species: Breeding and Culture. Second ed. Bangkok: The Kasetsart University Press; 2001
  73. 73. Huang C-F, Lin Y-H, Chen J-D. The use of RAPD markers to assess catfish hybridization. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2005;14:3003-3014
  74. 74. Apakulanu U, Lokulprakit S. Artificial breeding of Prophagorus nieuhofii (Val.). In: Proceedings of the 25th Kasetsart University Conference, Fisheries Section (in Thai). Bangkok: Kasetsart University; 1987. pp. 376-384
  75. 75. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). International Mechanisms for the Control and Responsible Use of Alien Species in Aquatic Ecosystems. Rome: FAO; 2005
  76. 76. Anene NS, Tianziang G. Is the Dutch domesticated strain of Clarias gariepinus a hybrid? African Journal of Biotechnology. 2007;6:1072-1076
  77. 77. FAO 2009
  78. 78. Senanan W, Kapuscinski AR, Na-Nakorn U, Miller LM. Genetic impacts of hybrid catfish farming (Clarias macrocephalus * C. gariepinus) on native catfish populations in central Thailand. Aquaculture. 2004;235:167-184
  79. 79. Main KL, Reynolds E, editors. Selective Breeding of Fishes in Asia and the United States. Honolulu: Oceanic Institute; 1993
  80. 80. Lévêque C. Biodiversity Dynamics and Conservation; The Freshwater Fish of Tropical. Africa: Cambridge University Press; 1997
  81. 81. Sulem YS, Tomedi ET, Mounchili S, Tekeng S, Brummett RS. Survival of Clarias gariepinus fry in earthen ponds: Effects of composts and leaks. Aquaculture. 2006;260:139-144
  82. 82. Mkumbo OC, Mlaponi E. Impact of the baited hook fishery on the recovering endemic fish species in Lake Victoria. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management. 2007;10(4):458-466
  83. 83. Fisheries Frame Survey. Implementation of a Fisheries Management Plan. Nairobi: Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development; 2006. pp. 8-24
  84. 84. Witte F, Goldschmidt T, Goudswaard PC, Van Oijen W, Ligtvoet MJP, Wanink J. Species extinction and concomitant ecological changes in Lake Victoria. Netherlands Journal of Zoology. 1992;42(2-3):214-232
  85. 85. Chitamwebwa D, Kamanyi J, Kayungi J, Nabbongo H, Ogola A, Ojuok J. The present status of the hook fishery and its impact on fish stocks of Lake Victoria. African Journal of Tropical Hydrobiology and Fisheries. 2009;12:78-82
  86. 86. Barasa JE. Enhancing sustainability in African catfish, Clarias gariepnus seed supply for improved production. Kenya Policy Briefs. 2020;1(1):5-6
  87. 87. Kaufman L, Ochumba P. Evolutionary and conservation biology of cichlid fishes as revealed by faunal remnants in the Northern Lake Victoria. Conservation Biology. 1993;7:719-730
  88. 88. Barasa JE, Abila R, Grobler JP, Njahira M, Dangasuk OG, Kaunda-Arara B. Genetic diversity and gene flow in African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) from lakes Victoria and Kanyaboli. African Journal of Aquatic Science. 2014;39(3):287-293
  89. 89. Barasa JE, Mdyogolo S, Abila R, Grobler JP, Skilton RA, Bindeman H, et al. Genetic diversity and Population structure of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus of Kenya: Implication for conservation and Aquaculture programmes. Belgian Journal of Zoology. 2017;147(2):105-127
  90. 90. Post G. Textbook of Fish Health. Neptune City, New Jersey: T. F. H Publications; 1987
  91. 91. Nyina-Wamwiza L, Wathelet B, Richir J, Rollin X, Kestemont P. Partial or total replacement of fish meal by local agricultural by-products in diets of juvenile African catfish: Growth performance, feed efficiency and digestibility. Aquaculture Nutrition. 2010;16:237-247
  92. 92. Chepkirui-Boit V, Ngugi CC, Bowman J, Oyoo-Okoth E, Rasowo J, Mugo-Bundi JM, et al. Growth performance, survival, feed utilization and nutrient utilization of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) larvae co-fed artemia and a micro-diet containing fresh water atiyd shrimp (Caridina nilotica) during weaning. Aquaculture Nutrition. 2011;17:e82-e89
  93. 93. Musa SM, Aura CM, Ngugi CC, Kundu R. The effect of three different feed types on growth performance and survival of African catfish fry (Clarias gariepinus) reared in a hatchery. ISRN Zoology. 2012;2012:1-7
  94. 94. Rasowo J, Auma E, Ssanyu G, Ndunguru M. Does African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) affect rice in integrated rice-fish culture in Lake Victoria Basin, Kisumu? African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2008;2(10):336-341
  95. 95. Rasowo J, Oyoo-Okoth E, Ngugi CC. Effects of formaldehyde, sodium chloride, potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide on hatch rate of African catfish Clarias gariepinus eggs. Aquaculture. 2007;269(2007):271-277
  96. 96. Magondu EW, Rasowo J, Oyoo-Okoth E, Charo-Karisa H. Evaluation of sodium chloride (NaCl) for potential prophylactic treatment and its short-term toxicity to African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822) yolk-sac and swim-up fry. Aquaculture. 2011;319:307-310
  97. 97. McClelland EK, Naish KA. What is the fitness outcome of crossing unrelated fish populations? A meta-analysis and an evaluation of future research directions. Conservation Genetics. 2007;8:397-416

Written By

Don Felix Ouma and James E. Barasa

Submitted: 15 July 2022 Reviewed: 22 July 2022 Published: 30 November 2022