Chapter 8 - BGM Jamieson, ultrastructure, reproductive biology ...

Non-leech Clitellata 299 

Fig. 8.23. Parvidrilus strayeri (Parvidrilidae). A. Schematic horizontal view of segments 12 and 13, 

showing general outline of ‘genital body’ and ‘copulatory organ’. B. Somewhat horizontal view of segments 

11-13 of a paratype. C. Somewhat lateral view of segments 11-13 of a further paratype. Relabeled after 

Erséus, C. 1999. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 112(2): 327-337, Fig. 2. 

species, P. spelaeus, suggest that the genital body and copulatory organ are 

respectively the atrium and spermathecae. 

Narapidae. Narapidae, a monotypic family (Righi and Varela 1983), are 

plesioporous and resemble the Naidinae in having the testes in segment 5 but 

differ from these in having the spermathecae in the ovarian, not the testicular, 

segment (Fig. 8.24). Male pores and atria are in 6, and penes are present. The

300 Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Annelida 

Fig. 8.24. Narapa bonettoi (Narapidae). A. Lateral view of segments 6-8. B. Transverse section of atrium. 

C. Lateral view of male ducts. Relabelled after Righi, G. and Varela, M. E. 1983. Revista De La 

Asociacion De Ciencias Naturales Del Litoral 14(1): 7-15, Figs. 4-6. 

atria are covered by diffuse gland cells. Whereas the testes and efferent ducts 

are paired, the ovary, in 7, is unpaired. There is a pair of spermathecae in 7. 

Like the Randiellidae and Propappidae, there is a gonad-less segment 

between the testicular and ovarian segments. This might represent a 

proandric condition derived from former holandry. 

8.2.11.3 Subclass Lumbriculata 

We will here deal only with the oligochaetous members, the Lumbriculidae. 

Other taxa here included are the Branchiobdellida, Acanthobdellida and 

Euhirudinea which are discussed in Chapter 9. 

Lumbriculidae. The Lumbriculidae is an Holarctic family with extension 

into West Asia. Some species have become widely distributed, including the 

Southern Hemisphere. The reproductive system is very variable. There are 

one to four pairs of testes, in variable locations. Atria are one to four pairs, 

located between segments 7 and 15, paired or unpaired, always in a testisbearing 

segment, each being associated with one or two pairs of testes (Figs. 

8.4B, 8.25). There are commonly two pairs of testes in adjacent segments, both 

with funnels and vasa deferentia feeding a single pair of atria in the same 

segment as the posterior pair of testes. Sometimes the anterior testes and 

ducts are absent, leaving a single pair of atria, testes and vasa deferentia 

within one segment, and then often with this arrangement serially repeated. 

There are one or two pairs of ovaries beginning one, or rarely two, segments 

behind the most posterior testis-bearing segments. Spermathecae are variable


Fig. 8.25. Bythonomus mirus (Lumbriculidae). Atrium and posterior male gonoduct. After Chekanovskaya, 

O.V. 1981. Aquatic Oligochaeta of the USSR, United States Department of the Interior and the National 

Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 513, Fig. 232. 

in number and either anterior or posterior to the testicular segments (Pinder 

and Brinkhurst 1994). 

Michaelsen (1928-32) (see Michaelsen 1928) brilliantly foreshadowed the 

findings of molecular phylogenetics when he illustrated (Fig. 8.26) a pathway 

from lumbriculid organization to that of hirudinid leeches. The progressive 

stages were exemplified by 1) the lumbriculid Rhynchelmis, with compact 

testes but long seminal vesicles, extending through several segments; 2) the 

lumbriculid Agriodrilus vermivorus, in which a chain of testes has developed 

within the elongate seminal vesicles, though still with a single pair of


Fig. 8.26. Hypothetical scheme suggesting that the testicular sacs of leeches corrrespond to the seminal 

vesicles of lumbriculids. A. Rhynchelmis. B. Agriodrilus vermivorus offers an intermediate in which a long 

series of testicular portions has developed in the original seminal vesicles. In an abnormal condition one 

of these was seen to be isolated like a testis in the chain of testes occurring in leeches. C. The leech 

condition: a chain of postovarian testes. Modified from Michaelsen, W. 1928. Oligochaeta. In W. Kukenthal 

and T. Krumbach (eds). Handbuch der Zoologie 2, Fig. 93. 

seminal funnels, and in which the coelom is constricted; 3) Hirudo in which 

each testicular chamber has acquired its own pair of seminal funnels and the 

coelom has been reduced to a system of sinuses. The leech distinction from 

oligochaetes, extension of testes posterior to the ovaries, was thus explained 

in terms of modification of pre-existing seminal vesicles. 

8.2.11.4 Subclass Diplotesticulata 

The validity of recognizing the Diplotesticulata is discussed in 8.1.4 above. 

Superorder Haplotaxidea. Order Haplotaxida sensu stricto. The 

haplotaxid reproductive system usually has two pairs of testes, in segments 

10 and 11 (rarely in 9 and 10); the anterior pair is rarely absent. There are 

one or two pairs of ovaries in the segments following the testicular segments. 

The male ducts are simple and lead to ventrolateral or lateral male pores. 

However there is a large glandular mass between the male pores in 

Hologynus hologynus, in which both pairs of male pores lie in the same 

segment, the posterior vasa deferentia being reflexed forward. The two pairs 

of vasa deferentia also open into a single segment in Pelodrilus violaceus but


in that case the anterior vasa penetrate more than one segment, discharging 

near the posterior pair in segment 12. 

In Adenodrilus denticulatus there are four pairs of large copulatory glands 

which open externally near the ventral setae and are not directly associated 

with the male ducts (Chekanovskaya 1981) (Fig. 8.27). These glands are 

reminiscent of those of Sparganophilus, a genus which has in the past been 

placed in the Haplotaxidae (Tétry 1934), but the molecular study (Jamieson 

et al. 2002) indicates that at least the type-species, Haplotaxis gordioides, is 

genetically distant from Sparganophilus. One species, H. brinkhursti, has lost 

the anterior pair of ovaries and therefore is unique in the known 

Haplotaxidae in having the metagynophoran condition. 

8.27. Adenodrilus denticulatus (Haplotaxidae). Lateral view of genital organs, showing large copulatory 

glands. After Chekanovskaya, O. V. 1981. Aquatic Oligochaeta of the USSR, United States Department 

of the Interior and the National Science Foundation, Washington, D. C., Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, 

New Delhi. pp. 513, Fig. 204. 

Tiguassuidae. The Tiguassuidae was recognized as a family by Jamieson 

(1988b) and by Brinkhurst (1988) in morphocladistic analyses for Tiguassu 

reginae which Righi et al. (1978) had placed in the Hapolotaxidae. In the 

analysis of Jamieson (1988b) Tiguassu proved paraphyletic relative to the 

Haplotaxidae sensu lato and formed the plesiomorphic sister-taxon of the 

Metagynophora. Its sole autapomorphy was restriction of the hearts to 

segment 10. The large proboscis-like prostomium (not computed) was a 

unique apomorphy in the entities included but is known homoplasically in 

the glossoscolecid Enantiodrilus bilolleyi Cognetti and is approached in some 

naids and lumbriculids. In its reproductive system (Fig. 8.28) Tiguassu 

provides evidence of reduction from two pairs of testes, and possibly from an 

ocotogonadal condition, in having two pairs of seminal funnels (in 10 and 

11) of which those in 10 are vestigial in the absence of testes. Well developed 

testes are present in 11. The female system is progynous, as in most 

haplotaxids, with a single pair of ovaries in 12 immediately succeeding a 

testis-segment. There are no atria or other modifications of the male ducts, 

presumably as plesiomorphic conditions. There are two pairs of small,


Fig. 8.28. Tiguassu reginae (Tiguassuidae). Reconstruction of the anterior 15 segments based on serial 

sections, showing the reproductive system with vestigial anterior seminal funnels. The smaller figure 

shows the proboscis-like prostomium. After Righi, G. et al. 1978. Acta Amazonica 8 (3 Supplement 1): 

1-49, Figs. 3, 1. 

adiverticulate spermathecae, in segments 9 and 10. The ova have a diameter 

of 40-50 µm (Righi et al. 1978). The co-occurrence of spermathecae with male 

funnels in 10 is a condition also seen in the Tubificidae, as is the great 

elongation of the seminal vesicle, but ovisacs were not found. 

Superorder Metagynophora. Loss of the anterior ovaries of a 

hypothetical octogonadal set, with retention of ovaries in segment 13 so that 

a segment lacking gonads intervenes between the posterior testes and the 

ovaries, or two segments in proandric taxa such as alluroidids, diagnoses all 

oligochaetes above the tubificid-enchytraeid assemblage and the 

Lumbriculidae, i.e. from the Moniligastridae through the Megascolecidae, 

loosely termed ‘megadriles’. This synapomorphy characterizes the 

Metagynophora of Jamieson (1988b) (Fig. 8.4). These are equivalent to the 

Lumbricida of Brinkhurst (1982). As the most plesiomorphic representatives, 

the Moniligastridae, Alluroididae and Syngenodrilidae, have not been 

sequenced for DNA, monophyly of the Metagynophora awaits confirmation 

from molecular analysis. 

Order Moniligastrida. Moniligastridae. Reproductive features among 

unambiguous synapormorphies for the Moniligastrida, as represented by 

Desmogaster and Moniligaster, are: ovaries in septal chambers; testis-sacs 

suspended on the posterior septum of the testicular segment; seminal 

vesicles absent; prostates capsular; spermathecae with non-seminal 

diverticula. 

Brinkhurst and Jamieson (1971) had already recognized the 

Moniligastrida as a separate order. Jamieson (1977b) re-interpreted the long 

debated nature of the testis-sacs, showing that they were neither reduced 

segments, as proposed by Stephenson (1922, 1930), nor intraseptal cavities, 

as argued by Gates (1962), but that they were normal testis-sacs which, with 

their enclosed testes, had become detached from the original testis-bearing 

septa (Fig. 8.29). It was recognized that moniligastrids are extraordinarily 

primitive in retaining a plesiopore condition, the extremely plesiomorphic


Fig. 8.29. Distribution of genital organs in relation to existing segmentation and hypothetical segmental 

homologues in Moniligastridae. Origin of the ‘intraseptal’ testis-sacs from premoniligastrid sacs attached, 

with their testes, to the anterior septa of segments 10 and 11, as in other metagynophorans, is 

hypothesized. From Jamieson, B. G. M. 1977. Evolutionary Theory 2: 95-114, Fig. 3. 

state (in Desmogaster) of 2 pairs of male pores in consecutive segments (both 

conditions seen elsewhere only in the Haplotaxidae) and a single layered 

clitellum with large yolked eggs. The moniligastrid clitellum is here shown 

to consist of a single layer of tall, slender modified epidermal cells with basal 

nuclei and dense granular secretory contents which discharge at the outer 

surface of each cell (Fig. 8.30A,B). They contrast with the wider, more robust 

goblet cells (putative large orthochromatic mucous cells) which predominate 

in the general epidermis (Fig. 8.30C). 

The reproductive system of a moniligastrid is here exemplified by that of 

Moniligaster troyi described by Jamieson (1977b). Details of the system are


Fig. 8.30. Light micrographs of the reproductive anatomy of Moniligaster troyi (Moniligastridae). A. 

Longitudinal section of the clitellum confirming that is consists of a single layer of cells. B. Same, through 

an intersegmental furrow. C. Longitudinal section of the general epidermis, showing the goblet cells. D. 

Longitudinal section of a testis-sac showing that it has anterior and posterior portions suspended in a 

septum. E. Morulae of spermatids in a testis-sac; a spermatid is labeled in a layer of spermatids encircling 

and attached to the cytophore. Abbreviations: c.m, circular muscle; clit.gl, secretory contents of a cell of 

the clitellum; cu, cuticle; cy, cytophore; go.c, goblet cell; l.m, longitudinal muscle; mo, morula of 

spermatids; sep, septum; spd, spermatid (in a layer of spermatids encircling and attached to the cytophore); 

te.s, testis-sac wall. From Jamieson, unpublished.


illustrated from previously unpublished light micrographs (Figs. 8.30, 8.31). 

Testes and putative funnels are enclosed in a pair of diaphanous iridescent 

testis-sacs. Each sac is suspended in a septum so that it has pre- and postseptal 

portions (Figs. 8.29, 8.30D). The vas deferens from each testis-sac joins 

the sac ventrally at the anterior face of the supporting septum and passes into 

the anterior segment (segment 9) abutting the septum; it is very long and 

much coiled in this segment; numerous coils nearest the sac are narrow and 

iridescent but by far the greater length is wider and non-iridescent, with 

many hair-pin bends, and forms a large cluster. The vas deferens continues 

posteriorly to join the glandular portion of the prostates, in segment 11, 

considerably ectal of the ental end of the gland, and is straight in this 

segment. Immediately within the testis-sac the vas deferens gives rise to 

several iridescent ribbons which pass posteriorly for the entire length of the 

sac and were interpreted (Jamieson 1977b) as a backwardly directed sperm 

funnel. The testis-sac contains developmental stages of spermatozoa, 

including morulae of spermatids and free spermatozoa (Fig. 8.30D,E); it thus 

functions as a testis-sac and seminal vesicle. 

Each prostate extends from its pore, at 10/11 to intersegment 13/14; it 

has a clavate, superficially slightly lobulated glandular portion and a shorter, 

narrow duct which is poorly differentiated from the gland; the duct forms a 

muscular swelling at the pore which houses the base of the combined male 

and prostatic porophore (Jamieson 1977b) (Figs. 8.15, 8.31H,J). The wall of the 

gandular portion of the prostate consists of an outer thick longitudinal 

muscle layers, a thinner, though still thick, intermediate circular muscle layer, 

and an inner epithelium which contains gland cells (Fig. 8.31G,I). 

The ovary consists of folded (fan-like) laminae (Fig. 8.31F,H) on the 

anterior septum of its segment (11?). Oviducal funnels have yet to be 

recognized but large elongate ovisacs extend into segment 13 though 

arising from septum 11/12 against which septum 13/14 is adpressed; some 

lobules each contain a large-yolked egg (putative primary oocyte) with 

conspicuous nucleus. 

Moniligaster troyi has one pair of spermathecae, each with a large, 

elongate-ovoid ampulla in segment 8, its duct is long and much coiled in this 

segment but almost straight (Fig. 8.31C) on passing into segment 7 where it 

joins the apex of the wide, muscular ectal spermathecal duct (Figs. 8.14, 

8.31A,B). The latter duct has two branches or horns, one on each side of the 

apex, each of which bears a large lobulated gland, the dichotomous gland; 

with the ectal spermathecal duct this constitutes the spermathecal atrium, 

discharging at intersegment 7/8 on each side. The spermathecal ampulla, in 

its ectal half, and its duct are exceptional for oligochaetes in being internally 

ciliated (Fig. 8.31A,B). The dichotmous gland consists of many blind tubules, 

opening into a common lumen; each tubule consists of a tall, glandular 

epithelium (Fig. 8.31C-E). 

Order Opisthopora. All remaining oligochaetes, above the 

Moniligastridae, from the Alluroididae to the Megascolecidae, form a 

convincing clade, the Opisthopora (see 8.1).


Fig. 8.31 contd


Suborder Alluroidina. Superfamily Alluroidoidea. Syngenodrilidae. 

Apomorphies of the syngenodrilid reproductive system include presence of 

longitudinal tubercula pubertatis, intrasegmental testis-sacs, tubular 

prostate-like glands, all of which occur in other taxa, and a unique location 

of prostate pores in segments 11, 12 and 13. The male pores are lateral, and 

separate from the prostate pores, in segment 13. Genital and penial chaetae 

are present or absent. The clitellum begins in segment 11 and intraclitellar 

tubercula are present. Female pores lie in segment 14. Spermathecal pores are 

two pairs, posteriorly in segments 7 and 8. Testes are two pairs in 10 and 11 

(rarely on segment more posterior), enclosed in the testis-sacs. The seminal 

vesicles are of a microdrile type, extending posteriad within the ovisacs 

through several segments. 

Alluroididae. Like the Syngenodrilidae, alluroidids represent an 

evolutionary transition in that they have the microdrile characteristic of a 

single layered clitellum but have attained the most plesiomorphic 

opisthoporan condition of male pores in segment 13, as in Righiella jamiesoni 

(Fig. 8.32A). 

In alluroidids the unilayered clitellum (Fig. 8.32D) commences on 

segment 12 or 13. Male pores are ventral to lateral in the chaetal arc of 

segment 13 or 14. The pair of female pores lies at or near the anterior border 

of segment 14. Spermathecal pores are paired, lateral, or are single, middorsal, 

in segments 6-9, maximally in three of these segments, never in line 

with the male pores. The male gonads are proandric, with testes in segment 

10. In Kathrynella guyanae, all gonads are homeotically displaced one segment 

further posteriorly so that the testes are in 11. The sperm funnels have their 

mouths directed anterodorsally. Seminal vesicles project into the segment 

behind that of the testes or are absent; in the latter case spermatogenesis 

occurs in the testis-segment. Prostates (atria) are tubular or bulbous, receiving 

the male ducts, or discharging with the latter but separately from them, into 

a terminal chamber; they consist of an internal epithelium surrounded by a 

Fig. 8.31 contd 

Fig. 8.31. Light micrographs of the reproductive anatomy of Moniligaster troyi (Moniligastridae), continued. 

A. Longitudinal section (LS) of a spermathecal ampulla. B. Same, showing internal ciliation. C. Passage 

of the straight region of the spermathecal duct through septum 7/8 into segment 7, where it joins (not 

shown) the dichotomous gland. Note lobes of the gland. D. Cross section through the dichotomous gland. 

E. Cross section through a single tubule of the dichotomous gland. F. Longitudinal section of the ovary, 

showing stages of oogenesis with terminal putative primary oocytes. G. Section through the prostate gland, 

showing the three layers of its wall, with inner gland cells. H. Section showing all regions of the prostates 

in segment 11: glandular region, duct and muscular swelling containing the common prostatic and male 

porophore. The ovary is visible (top left) in the following segment. I. Section of the glandular part of the 

prostate. J. Approximately horizontal section of the muscular swelling containing the common prostatic and 

male porophore. Abbreviations: ci, ciliation; c.m, circular muscle; di.g, dichotomous gland; gl.c, gland cell; 

l.m, longitudinal muscle; ov, ovary; p.o, putative primary oocyte; pr.d, prostate duct; pr. ep, internal 

epithelium of prostate gland; pr.g, prostate gland; pr. lu, lumen of prostate gland; pr.po, common prostatic 

and male porophore; sep, septum; sp.amp, spermathecal ampulla; sp.d, straight part of spermathecal duct. 

From Jamieson, unpublished.


Fig. 8.32 contd


muscular sheath outside which prostatic (atrial gland) cells are usually 

present. Ductules from the atrial gland cells penetrate the muscular sheath 

of the atrium, as in Alluroides brinkhursti brinkhursti (Fig. 8.32E,G), to reach the 

atrial lumen; an elongate penis, terminally containing a spermatozoal mass, 

may be present (Fig. 8.32F). Genital or penial chaetae are present or absent. 

Ovisacs extend posteriorly from the ovarian segment through several 

segments. 

Suborder Crassiclitellata. Crassiclitellate relationships are discussed 

under molecular phylogeny in 8.1.4 above (see also Fig. 8.4A,B). 

Biwadrilidae.The reproductive apparatus of Biwadrilus bathybates, 

illustrated by Nagase and Nomura (1937) (Fig. 8.33) lacks spermathecae, an 

absence shared with Criodrilus, in the Almidae (sensu Jamieson 1988b) and 

with Ocnerodrilus. In the case of Ocnerodrilus, at least, this appears to be a 

homoplasy. The male system is holandric, with testes in 10 and 11; testis-sacs 

are absent; seminal vesicles are two pairs, in segments 11 and 12. Vasa 

deferentia are intraparietal for much of their lengths, uniting only at the 

base of the conical male porophore, on each side on segment 13. The ventral 

chaetae of 13 are replaced by bifid genital chaetae. Prostate glands 

consisting of numerous lobules with branched ducts, bundles of ducts, and 

common ducts open into a male slit just ventral to each male pore. A large 

single ‘copulation gland’, resembling the chaetal gland of Microchaetus, is 

present on each side in 13, opening into the male slit ventrally to the prostate 

pores and just external to the genital chaetae; each gland has a terminal duct 

and a glandular portion consisting of outer peritoneum, a middle muscularvascular 

layer, an inner glandular layer with three types of cells, and a 

simple lumen. The lobed ovaries occupy the metagynophoran location of 

segment 13, with pores in 14. Ovisacs are restricted to segment 14 but an 

extensive subenteric (non-genital?) septal pouch (also seen in Microchaetus) 

may be present, arising further anteriorly. 

The location of the male pores, in segment 13, in Biwadrilus, only one 

segment behind the plesioporous location, is the most plesiomorphic 

condition for the Opisthopora and for the Crassiclitellata. It is shared with 


Fig. 8.32. Righiella jamiesoni (Alluroididae). A. Diagram showing arrangement of genital organs and 

vascular commissures. B. Transverse section (TS) of spermthecal duct. C. TS of prostate. After Omodeo, 

P. and Coates, K.A. 2000. Hydrobiologia 463(39): 39-47, Fig. 6. D-F. Alluroides brinkhursti brinkhursti. D. 

Transverse section (TS) of clitellum, showing single cell layer; the cells with conspicuous secretory 

granules and each with a basal nucleus. E. TS through the wall of the atrium, showinga group of atrial 

gland cells with ductule penetrating the muscular sheath of the atrium. F. Longitudinal section through the 

male pore, showing the ectal end of the atrium, which forms a penis with muscular sheath, ciliated 

epithelium and rope of spermatozoa in the lumen, forming in the ectal chamber a sperm mass. G. Alluroides 

pordagei. Oblique section through the atrial bulb, containing a large sperm mass, and the associated atrium. 

D-G. From Jamieson, unpublished figures from the study of Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971a. Alluroididae. Pp. 

708-722. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. G. M. Jamieson (eds), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and 

Boyd, Edinburgh.


the non-crassiclitellate Alluroididae and the male genital systems of the two 

families show considerable similarities. Testing of phylogenetic proximity 

from molecular sequences would be desirable. 

Glossoscolecidae. The glossoscolecid clitellum is usually saddle-shaped 

and occupies as many as 15 segments, beginning near or shortly behind the 

female pores. Male pores are inconspicuous, one pair, rarely two pairs, 

intraclitellar or (Opisthodrilus) postclitellar. The female pores have the normal 

crassiclitellate location in segment 14 or exceptionally (Enantiodrilus) there 

are two pairs, in segments 13 and 14. The spermathecal pores are 

pretesticular, rarely extending into or behind the testis-segments; and in each 

intersegment occupied are usually a pair, though sometimes multiple, 

sometimes absent. Testes are one or two pairs, in segment 10 or segments 10 

and 11; testis-sacs are present or absent. Copulatory sacs are present or 

absent. Spermathecae are absent (Glossoscolex, Fimoscolex, Goiascolex) or, 

usually, are present, when they extend freely into the coelom and are well 

differentiated into duct and ampulla or are intraparietal and poorly 

differentiated; they usually lack diverticula (Gates 1972; Jamieson 1971c; 

Righi 1995; Sims 1982). 

Tumakidae. Tumak hammeni (Fig. 8.35C,D) has a saddle-shaped clitellum 

commencing in segment 14 and occupies 9 segments. Male and female pores 

are microscopic, the female in the usual crassiclitellate location of segment 

14, the male in 18 on the tubercula. Genital papillae surround the ventral 

setae (a and b separately) in segment 12 and throughout the clitellar region 

except in 17-20 where there is one pair of rectangular, tumid glandular pads 

in each segment; the pads on each side collectively considered to probably 

be homologous with the puberal bands (here termed tubercula pubertatis) of 

glossocolecids. We may also note the striking resemblance of the genital field 

to that of the microchaetid Michalakus (Fig. 8.35A,B). Testes and male funnels 

occupy segments 10 and 11, lacking testis-sacs; seminal vesicles are paired 

in 11 and 12. Tumak differs from the Glossoscolecidae in having intraparietal 

male ducts. The ovaries are large, folded and fan-shaped. Prostates and 

copulatory chambers are absent. The spermathecae are post-testicular, 

simple, two pairs in each of segments 12-14, lacking diverticula or seminal 

chambers and opening by microscopic pores in the corresponding anterior 

intersegments (Righi 1995). 

Eudrilidae. In eudrilids the male pores lie segment in 17, as is also 

typical of Ocnerodrilidae. Eudrilids differ from the Megascolecidae in having 

euprostates (Fig. 8.34), i.e. tubular prostates through which the male ducts 

discharge and which appear to be reflexed modifications of these ducts, thus 

more resembling the atria of lumbriculids and monilgastrids than the 

separate prostates (metaprostates) of megascolecids. However, the ectal ends 

of the vasa deferentia in some ocnerodriles are enlarged and somewhat 

resemble euprostates, though accompanied by tubular metaprostates. 

Eudrilids further differ from megascolecids, and ocnerodrilids, in migration 

of the spermathecae from the basic earthworm anterior location (in and/or 

anterior to segment 9) to the vicinity of the ovaries (in 13; sometimes posterior


Fig. 8.33. Biwadrilus bathybates (Biwadrilidae). Diagrammatic dorsal view of genitalia. Relabelled from 

Jamieson 1971c. Glossoscolecidae. Pp. 147-199. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. G. M. Jamieson (eds), The 

Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Toronto, Fig. 15.12A, After Nagase and 

Nomura. 

to the male pore) and in the development in many of internal fertilization, 

foreign sperm passing internally from the spermathecae to ovisacs, on the 

oviducts, internally (see, for instance, Jamieson 1967, 1969; Sims 1967; Zicsi 

1997). Elsewhere in the Oligochaeta, only the Phreodrilidae are suspected of 

having internal fertilization. 

The reproductive system in the Eudrilinae is more complex than that of 

the Pareudrilinae. In the latter transitions are seen in Stuhlmannia from


Fig. 8.34 contd


ovaries free in the ovarian segment, presumably with fertilization in the 

cocoon, to ovaries enclosed within the spermathecal system and with 

presumed internal fertilization. Penetration of the wall of the spermatheca by 

sperm from the partner, thus gaining access to the ovisacs has been 

demonstrated in Stuhlmannia variabilis by Jamieson (1958, 1967). Transition 

from free to enclosed ovaries is also seen in the pareudrilines Chuniodrilus 

and Scolecillus (see Jamieson 1969) (Fig. 8.34). 

Microchaetidae. In microchaetids the single pair of male pores is 

intraclitellar, behind segment 16, and female pores are on segment 14. The 

clitellum is saddle-shaped, beginning on segment 11 to 14 and occupying as 

many as 44 segments though sometimes a more modest six segments. 

Spermathecal pores are immediately postesticular or also occupy the last 

testis segment and are paired or multiple in each intersegment. Testes are 

in segments 10 and 11 or 10 only, in testis-sacs. Copulatory sacs and 

prostates are absent. The spermathecae do not project far into the coelom but 

are sometimes sinuous tubes. Tubercula pubertatis and/or genital papillae 

are present and have been illustrated by Plisko in several papers (e.g. Plisko 

1996a,b) (see, for instance, Michalakus, Fig. 8.35). 

Lumbricidae. Lumbricidae, native in the Holarctic, are readily 

distinguished by location of the male pores, on 15, as in Lumbricus terrestris 

(Figs. 8.36, 8.53) or exceptionally 11, 12 or 13, well anterior to the clitellum. 

The clitellum is usually saddle-shaped, commencing between segments 17 

and 52, and occupying 4-32 segments (Fig. 8.53). The spermathecal pores are 

preclitellar and usually paired, in two to eight of furrows 5/6-19/20, 

commonly in 9/10 and 10/11. There are two pairs of testes (Fig. 8.36, 8.37A) 

rarely one pair, in segments 10 and 11, usually free but occasionally in 

suboesophageal or perioesophageal testis-sacs. The vasa deferentia are 


Fig. 8.34. Genital anatomy of some Eudrilidae (Pareudrilinae), showing transition from free to enclosed 

ovaries with internal fertilization. A-E. Spermathecal and female genital systems in Chuniodrilus and 

Scolecillus arranged in order of increasing modification. A. C. ghabbouri. B. C. zielae. C. C. vuattouxi. D. 

C. compositus. E. S. tantillus. Note, in B-E, asymmetry of the oviducal system, with the ovisac vestigial 

on the left side (contrast Stuhlmannia). F, G. Stuhlmannia variabilis. Dorsal and lateral view of female 

reproductive system, respectively. Ovaries in the ‘coelomic tube’ discharge eggs into the ovisac on the 

right side, that of the left side being vestigial. Allosperm received into the spermatheca pass through the 

wall of the spermathecal atrium into the oviducal system where they are presumed to effect internal 

fertilization. H. Stuhlmannia asymmetrica. Here the oviducal system is developed on the left side only, 

having been totally suppressed on the right side. Sperm do not have to penetrate the wall of the 

spermatheca to reach the oviducal system as there is a wide, ciliated portal between the two. I. 

Stuhlmannia variabilis. Spermatophore redrawn after Beddard. A-E. After Jamieson, B. G. M. 1969. 

Journal of Natural History 3: 41-51, Fig. 1, After Omodeo 1958. Mémoires de l’Institut Français d’Afrique 

Noire 53: 1-109, and Wasawo, D. and Omodeo, P. 1963. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale 

di Verona 11: 211-223. F-I. After Jamieson, B. G. M. 1967. Journal of Zoology, London 152: 79-126, Figs. 

2, 3, 7 and 4 respectively. Abbreviations: cd, coelomic diverticulum. cs, coelomic sac; ct, coelomic tube; 

fp, female pore; o, ovary; oca, ovarian capsule; od, oviduct; of, oviducal funnel; ol, oviducal loop; os, 

ovisac; sa, spermathecal atrium; sam, spermathecal ampulla; sch, seminal chamber; sdiv, spermathecal 

diverticulum.


Fig. 8.35. A,B. Genital field of Michalakus initus (Microchaetidae). After Plisko, J. D. 1996. Michalakus, 

a remarkable new genus of microchaetid earthworm from South Africa (Oligochaeta: Microchaetidae). 

Annals of the Natal Museum 37: 287-293, Figs. 1,2. C,D. Tumak hammeni. C. Ventral view of segments 

10 to 24, showing genital field. D. Spermathecae of segments 13 and 14. After Righi, G. 1995. Studies on 

Tropical Andean Ecosystems 4: 485-607, Fig. 201A,E. 

extraparietal and sometimes coiled behind the seminal funnels to form 

epididymides. There are two to four pairs of seminal vesicles. Spermathecae 

are adiverticulate; they lack a distinct duct and are intraparietal, sessile or 

pedunculate. The ovaries, in segment 13, have a single egg string; each 

oviduct, discharging at a paired female pore in segment 14, bears a small 

ovisac (Bouché 1972; Gates 1976; Sims 1980). 

Kynotidae. The clitellum is annular or saddle-shaped in the region of 

segments 18-47. Tubercula pubertatis are absent. Male pores (clasper pores) 

are preclitellar, very conspicuous, on segment 16 or, rarely, 15, on a flat area 

or, on erection, on everted copulatory sacs (Fig. 8.37B). The spermathecal 

pores are post-testicular in the region of intersegments 13/14-16/17 and 

multiple in each row. Distinctive tubular prostate-like glands are associated 

with the copulatory sacs and with the follicles of preclitellar genital chaetae 

(Fig. 8.37C). The adiverticulate spermathecae are spherical to tubular (see 

review in Jamieson 1971c). 

Hormogastridae. In hormogastrids the male pores are intraclitellar, in the 

posterior half of segment 15, as in the type-species Hormogster redii (Fig. 

8.39B), or, rarely, discharge on the tubercula pubertatis on 22 (as also in 

Ailoscolex). The clitellum is annular or saddle shaped, commencing on or 

near segments 12 or 14 and extends posteriorly for about 17 segments. The 

spermathecae are paired or multiple, in two to four intersegments, at the level


Fig. 8.36. Lumbricus terrestris (Lumbricidae). Anatomy revealed by sagittal bisection. Original.


Fig. 8.37. A. Lumbricus terrestris (Lumbricidae). Diagram of the reproductive organs in dorsal view. 

Relabelled after Jepson, M. 1951. Biological Drawings. Part II. John Murray, London, p. 32. B, C. Kynotus 

cingulatus (Kynotidae). B. Ventral surface of segment 13-16, showing the pores of three pairs of prostates; 

a fourth pair discharges at the male pores. The clasper is shown evaginated through the left male pore 

(clasper pore). C. Internal view of the four pairs of prostates and the bursa propulsoria which contains the 

clasper. Each prostate is a convoluted tube enveloped in a sac. After Stephenson 1930. The Oligochaeta. 

Oxford. Figs. 145,146, from Benham. 

of the genital segments. Testes are two pairs, in 10 and 11, or a pair in 11 only. 

Testis-sacs are absent but there are two pairs of seminal vesicles, in segments 

11 and 12. Copulatory sacs and prostates are absent. Female pores lie in 

segment 14 (Bouché 1972; Sims 1980).


Lutodrilidae. Lutodrilus multivesiculatus is unique in the earthworms in 

having ten pairs of testes, in segments 12-21. It is considered to have 

interpolated ten segments, the last eight of them testicular, anterior to the 

normal megadrile location of testes in segments 10 and 11 (Jamieson 1978b). 

Lutodrilus stands apart from other almoids in having single-stringed ovaries, 

a feature clearly over-valued by Gates (1976) in aligning Lutodrilus with 

Lumbricus in his Lumbricoidea. 

The male pores are in segment 32; the pores discharge on a tumescence 

that encloses both ventral chaetal couples on 32 and 33. There is one pair 

of female pores, on segment 24. The clitellum is annular, only slightly 

swollen, and covers 37-51 segments, between segments 20 to 71. Alae about 

1.5-3 mm high, extend through 16-32 segments, through segments 22 to 53 

(Fig. 8.38A). Similar alae are also seen in the almoids Glyphidrilus (Fig. 8.38B), 

and, as segmentally less extensive claspers, in Drilocrius alfari (Fig. 8.38C) 

and Alma (Fig. 8.11A,B). Genital tumescences surround the ventral chaetal 

pairs in some of segments 13-51. The male tumescence is an elevated 

flattened area on the ventrum of 32-33, sometimes also 31 and/or 34. 

The ten pairs of testes are not enclosed in testis-sacs; each has several 

strings; vasa deferentia are intraparietal and prostates are absent. Seminal 

vesicles are largest in 14-22, attached to the posterior facesof their respective 

septa with the exception of the vesicles of 11 and 12 which attach to the 

anterior faces of septa 11/12 and 12/13 respectively. The ovaries are paired 

in segment 23, each with a single egg-string. The spermathecae are ovoidal 

and intraparietal in 2-5 of intersegments 15/16-25/26, that is, commencing 

in the gonadal region; they are multiple in each row; the external pores are 

not recognizable (McMahan 1976,1979). If the ten interpolated sections are 

deducted, comparison with other megadriles is facilitated and its closest 

relationship of seen to be with the Oriental Glyphidrilus and Ethiopian 

Callidrilus. 

Almidae. The reproductive anatomy of the Alminae will here be 

considered separately from that of the Criodrilinae. 

Alminae. In the Alminae genital chaetae, if present, are little if at all 

modified, except when on claspers. The male pores are one pair, on segments 

15-30, always inconspicuous, intraclitellar or preclitellar. Female pores are on 

segment 14 but Glyphidrilus kukenthali is one of only three megadrile species 

known to have two pairs of female pores, in 13 and 14. Spermathecal pores 

are post-testicular (as in microchaetids), but are rarely continued into and 

anterior to the testis segments; they are sometimes (some Alma species) 

translocated into the hindbody; and are usually (with the spermathecae) 

multiple in an intersgement. Testes are paired in segments 10 and 11 or 

(Areco) 11 only. Prostate-like glands are rarely present. The paired 

intraceolomic parietal glands described by Righi et al. (1978) in some 

segments in Areco, although seen in some other almids, are reminiscent of the 

prostate-like glands of Sparganophilus. This endorses the view (Jamieson 

1971b) that sparganophilids have a morphology close to that which might 

be attributed to proto-almids. A close relationship between Sparganophilus


Fig. 8.38. Genital fields in Lutodrilidae and Almidae. A. Lutodrilus multivesiculatus (Lutodrilidae). Anterior 

end, with genital region, in ventral view, showing alae. After McMahan, M. L. 1979. Proceedings of the 

Biological Society of Washington 92(1): 84-97, Fig. 1. B. Glyphidrilus kukenthali (Almidae). Anterior end, 

with genital region, in ventral view, showing alae. C. Drilocrius alfari (Almidae). Anterior end, with genital 

region, in ventral view, showing claspers. C and D after Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971. Glossoscolecidae. 

Pp. 147-199. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. G. M. Jamieson (eds), The Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, 

Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Toronto, Figs. 15.4B, 15.10A.


and almoids (represented by Criodrilus and Lutodrilus) is not refuted by 

molecular data (Figs. 8.1, 8.6). 

Almines are notable for extensions of the body wall in the vicinity of or 

including the male pores. These extensions may be mere protuberances, as 

in some Drilocrius species; or involve a greater extent of the body wall, as 

in Glyphidrilocrius, or take the form of wing or keel-like structures (alae) in 

Glyphidrilus (Fig. 8.38B) or paddle-shaped claspers in Drilocrius alfari (Fig. 

8.38C) and all species of Alma (Fig. 8.38A,B). In D. alfari, the male pores lie 

near the bases of the claspers but in Alma they are near the tips of the 

claspers which are furnished with genital chaetae and sucker-like structures 

(Figs. 8.11, 8.56). 

The structure of the clitellum of Alma emini has been described by Grove 

(1931) (Fig. 8.8D) and corresponds closely with that observed by the same 

author in the glossoscolecid Diachaeta exul, in the almids, Callidrilus 

ugandaensis by Jamieson (1971b), Glyphidrilus annandalei by Nair (1938) and 

Alma nilotica (Fig. 8.8E) by Khalaf El Duweini (1951) and in the 

sparganophilid Sparganophilus tamesis by Jamieson (1971b) (Fig. 8.8B). The 

clitellum of the biwadrilid Biwadrilus is similar but has, in addition to the 

fine- and coarse-grained cells, club-shaped peripheral cells with fine or 

coarse granules (Nagase and Nomura, 1937). In Criodrilus lacuum, Benham 

(1887) observed only glandular cells with small spherical globules. 

In Alma nilotica (Fig. 8.8E) the shortest (outermost) cells are normal 

epidermal supporting cells with a few sensory cells and mucin-secreting cells 

irregularly distributed amongst them. The cells that appear to make the 

middle layer are glandular cells which are fairly numerous and are 

irregularly distributed. They contain large granules and there is evidence that 

they secrete the cuticle and membrane of the cocoon. The apparent third layer 

is composed of cells appearing to form several tiers and arranged in groups 

that are separated from one another by thin lamellae of connective tissue. 

These contain fine granules of an albuminous secretion (Khalaf El Duweini 

1951). 

The latter author, as did Grove (1931) for Alma emini and Grove and 

Cowley (1927) for Eisenia, presents evidence that the fine-granule cells 

secrete the albuminous contents of the cocoon. Grove (1931) considered this 

relative abundance of mucin-secreting cells in the clitellum of A. emini to 

indicate secretion of a copulatory slime tube. Their paucity in the clitellum 

of A. nilotica corresponds with the absence of a slime tube in this species. 

Criodrilinae. The Criodrilinae contain a single genus, Criodrilus (Fig. 

8.19), including two species, the type-species Criodrilus lacuum and little 

know species inquirendae, C. ochridensis. In C. lacuum the ventralmost chaetae 

of at least segments 12, 13, 16-18 are modified as genital chaetae: terminally 

bearing four deep longitudinal grooves the proximal ends of which grade 

into irregular transverse jagged tooth-like ridges. The clitellum is indistinctly 

delimited anteriorly and posteriorly, annular, embracing 14, 15, 16 to 45, 47 

(=30, 32, 34 segments). It consists histologically of an outer columnar 

epidermis continuous with that of the general body surface and three or four


layers of club-shaped glandular cells with basal nucleus and filled with 

highly refractive small spherical globules. Male porophores are very strongly 

protuberant, transversely placed, ellipsoidal mounds filling, and widening, 

segments 15 and 16 longitudinally. Each male pore is a transverse cleft 

deeply bisecting the summit of the male porophore. There may be one to 

several spermatophores: curved, horn-shaped, hard but flexible structures 

approximately 1 mm long and maximally about 0.4 mm wide, at the 

expanded base; attached in the vicinity of the genital field. The female pores 

are each a small transverse slit in intersegmental furrow 14/15. Spermathecal 

pores are absent. 

The testes are free, digitate, or delicate, transversely slightly plicate lobes 

in segments 10 and 11; posterior to each is a much convoluted sperm funnel. 

Seminal vesicles are four pairs, in segments 9-12. The vasa deferentia are 

concealed deeply in the unusually thick body wall musculature, emerging in 

the coelom of segment 15 where that of each side of the body joins the anterodorsal 

aspect of a large hemispherical male bursa or prostate gland which 

is restricted to that segment. The gland consisting of cells similar to and 

continuous with those forming the epidermis of the clitellum; the muscular 

layers of the body wall covering the inner surface of the gland are thin; the 

vas deferens is continuous through the substance of the gland to the male 

pore. Each ovary is a solid, tongue-like or paddle-shaped lobe showing few 

external indications of oocytes, almost filling the length of segment 13. 

Oviducal funnels form small rosettes. Ovisacs, in segment 14, at maturity are 

at least as large as the ovaries and contain large oocytes; they project into 14 

from septum 13/14 and are closely associated with but apparently not 

directly connected with the funnels (Jamieson 1971c). 

Ailoscolecidae. The male pores of Ailoscolex are intraclitellar, discharging 

on the tubercula pubertatis anteriorly in segment 22. The clitellum is annular, 

on segments 14-23 though incomplete ventrally in the first three segments. 

The tubercula pubertatis each consist of a gutter bordered dorsally by a pad 

and ventrally by the chaetal papillae, in segments 22-24. In Ailoscolex 

lacteospumosus the chaetal papillae form a row of contiguous tubercles from 

14-24, of which the last three pairs are fused with the ventral aspect of the 

large tuberculum pubertatis (Bouché 1972) (Fig. 8.39A). 

Testes are paired, in 10 and 11; testis-sacs are absent; seminal vesicles lie 

in 11 and 12. Spermathecae are simple, very large, intracoelomic, pedunculate 

and globose, in segment 9 and 10. Prostate-like glands occur on the body 

wall, associated with the tubercula pubertatis, and radiate about a point of 

maximum density situated on intersegments 21/22-23/24. Ovaries are in 

segment 13, and large ovisacs in 14 (Bouché 1972). Ailoscolex appears to have 

close affinities with the family Komarekionidae (see below), which was 

subsumed in it by Sims (1980, 1982) and with the Sparganophilidae. 

Komarekionidae. This family is known from a single, terrestrial species, 

Komarekiona eatoni (Gates 1974), from North America. (Sims 1980, 1982) 

included Komarekiona in the Ailoscolecidae. There are striking similarities 

between the two entities, including the unusual location of male pores on


Fig. 8.39. Anterior ends, showing genital fields of A. Ailoscolex lactospumosus (Ailoscolecidae). B. 

Hormogaster redii insularis (Hormogastridae). After Bouché, M. B. 1972. Lombriciens de France: Écologie 

et Systématique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Vol. 72, Fig. 19. 

segment 22; the long, saddle-shaped clitellum; tubercula pubertatis on the 

clitellum; the dorsolateral location of the spermathecal pores; the large 

number of tubular prostate-like glands associated with ventral chaetae; and 

the adiverticulate spermathecae. However, Komarekiona shows important 

differences from Ailoscolex which collectively are here considered to caution 

against synoymy in the Ailoscolecidae, although it must be admitted that 

variation of a similar magnitude occurs within other families, for instance the 

Megascolecidae. These differences are numbers of gizzards (single in 

segment 6, two, in 6-7 and 8-9, in Ailoscolex); absence of nephridial caeca and 

an intestinal typhlosole; a pretesticular (not testicular) location of the 

spermathecae; and presence of two pairs of latero-oesophgeal vessels which 

are not seen in Ailoscolex. 

In Komarekiona the clitellum is saddle-shaped, in segments 19-25 or 26, 

and bears ridge-like tubecula pubertatis. The male pores are inconspicuous, 

near the equator of segment 22. Spermathecae are adiverticulate, with pores


in 6/7-8/9. There are two pairs of testes, in segments 10 and 11. The vasa 

deferentia are supraparietal. Prostates are absent but prostate-like tubular 

glands, resembling those of Sparganophilus, are associated with the ventral 

chaetae in any of segments 7 to 26, those in 9-11 are larger. Additional, 

intraclitellar paired glands occur between the ventral chaetal pairs in some 

or all of segments 20-26. The ovaries have a single, terminal egg-string. 

Sparganophilidae. The male pores in Sparganophilus are one pair, 

inconspicuous in intersegmental furrow 18/19 or anteriorly in segment 19 

(Fig. 8.40). The saddle-shaped clitellum is extensive, occupying eight to 

twelve segments in the region of segments 15-19. Tubercula pubertatis, in the 

Fig. 8.40. Sparganophilus tamesis (=eiseni) (Sparganophilidae). A. Dorsal dissection. B. Anterior end, 

with genital region, in ventral view. After Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971. Glossoscolecidae. Pp. 147-199. In 

R. O. Brinkhurst and B. G. M. Jamieson (eds), The Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and Boyd, 

Edinburgh, Toronto, Figs.15.13C and B.


clitellar region, are ridge like or a series of paillae, lateral to the ventral 

chaetal couples. Female pores are inconspicuous, in front of the ventral 

chaetal couples of segment 14. Spermathecal pores are inconspicuous, and 

dorsolateral, in 6/7-8/9, or 5/6 also, a single pair or four pairs per 

intersegment. Pores of postate-like glands, if these are present, are minute in 

the vicinity of the ventral chaetae in several segments in the clitellar region 

and sometimes in a variable number of more anterior segments. Testes and 

funnels are free in segments 10 and 11; seminal vesicles two pairs, in 11 and 

12. Vasa deferentia are intraparietal. Ovaries are of the lumbricid type, i.e. 

with a single egg string, in 14; small ovisacs are present. Spermathecae are 

adiverticulate, paired or multiple, and extend far into the coelom (Jamieson 

1971c). Resemblances to the Ailoscolecidae are noted under that family, 

above. 

Megascolecoidea. Families Ocnerodrilidae and Megascolecidae. This 

grouping is strongly supported by molecular data (Jamieson et al. 2002) (Fig. 

8.1). 

Ocnerodrilidae. Relationship of ocnerodriles to the Megascolecidae has 

been widely accepted but they have been given subfamilial or familial status 

or even dispersed within the Megascolecidae (see Jamieson 1971d). 

Molecular analyses (Jamieson 2000; Jamieson et al. 2002) indicate that they 

are the plesiomorph sister-group of the Megascolecidae (Acanthodriliinae + 

Megascolecinae) (Fig. 8.1). They are divisible into two groups, ranking as 

subfamilies if ocnerodriles are given familial rank: the Ocnerodrilinae and 

a small group, the Malabarinae. The Ocnerodrilinae have extramural 

calciferous glands (esophageal diverticula) in segment 9; they occur from 

near the Tropic of Cancer in western North America through Central America 

and some Caribbean Islands into South America near the Tropic of Capricorn 

and throughout Africa from the Nile Valley and south of the Sahara, into 

Madagascar and the Seychelles. The Malabarinae lack extramural calciferous 

glands; they occur in the Indian subcontinent and Burma (Jamieson 1971d; 

Sims 1980, 1982). 

Ocnerodriles closely resemble Megascolecidae but differ from these in 

that calciferous glands, which are frequently absent from megascolecid 

species, are restricted to segment 9, or, in Malabarinae, 9 and 10. They are 

plesiomorphic relative to megascolecids in origin of the intestine in 

segment 12 (sometimes 13 or 14) and in not having added hearts behind 

segment 11 (Jamieson 1971d). 

With regard to reproductive anatomy, there are one to three pairs of 

tubular prostates with pores in the region of segments 16-21, of which one 

or two pairs are sometimes united with the male pores. Penial chaetae if, 

rarely, present are little modified. In some genera, including Eukerria (Fig. 8.9) 

(Jamieson 1970) the male pores and prostates are in the acanthodrilin 

arrangement which is typical of the megascolecid subfamily 

Acanthodrilinae. This genus alone was represented in the molecular 

analysis which confirmed sister-group relationship with the Megascolecidae 

(Jamieson 2000; Jamieson et al. 2002) (Fig. 8.6) and it would be desirable in


further analyses to include species with the typical ocnerodrile arrangement 

of a pair of united prostatic and male pores on segment 17. 

The clitellum in Ocnerodrilidae usually occupies up to seven segments, 

between 12 to 18, but in Nematogenia it is 13 segments long and extends to 

segment 26. Spermathecal pores are, as in megascolecids, pretesticular but, 

unlike the latter, rarely bear diverticula. Whereas in Pygmaeodrilus 

nabugaboensis the spermathecal diverticula are inseminated (Jamieson 1957), 

in P. montiskenyae the ampulla receives the sperm (Jamieson 1965) (Fig. 8.17). 

Megascolecidae. Megascolecids usually have male pores on segment 18, 

fused with or near a pair of prostate glands, or prostates in 17 and 19 with 

male pores intermediate or fused with one pair of prostate pores. Different 

arrangements are shown and named in Fig. 8.8 Hoplochaetella is exceptional 

in having two pairs of male pores. Prostate glands are tubular to racemose 

(the latter with branched internal ducts, as in Pheretima). The vasa deferentia 

do not usually enter the glandular part of the prostate and they are therefore 

metaprostates and not euprostates. Spermathecae are usually diverticulate, 

rarely (Fig. 8.18) multiple. 

The evidence of the Ocnerodrilidae, which may have from one to three 

or more pairs of prostates, suggests that more than one pair of prostates 

were present in ancestral megascolecids. In the Megascolecidae, two pairs are 

still seen in the acanthodrilin condition, in which two pairs of prostate pores 

lie on segments 17 and 19, and the male pores are on segment 18, or the 

homeotic equivalent of these segments. Correspondingly, there are usually 

two pairs of spermathecal pores, at intersegments 7/8 and 8/9. This 

condition of the male terminalia is typical, though not constant, for the 

Acanthodrilinae (Fig. 8.8) and is seen, and probably of common derivation, 

in the Ocnerodrilidae such as Eukerria (Figs. 8.9, 8.54A). It is well exemplified 

by the genus Diplotrema, in which, as is usual for the acanthodrilin condition, 

the two prostate pores of each side communicate with the male pores by a 

seminal groove. Michaelsen (e.g. 1928) may well have been correct in 

proposing the acanthodrilin arrangement as basic to the Acanthodrilinae 

and that the microscolecin condition (Figs. 8.8, 8.54B) resulted by loss of the 

posterior prostates (in segment 19) and migration of the male pores into the 

vicinity of the anterior prostate pores (on segment 17), but a sexprostatic 

(with prostates in segment 18 also, as in Dichogaster damonis) or 

multiprostatic precursor (as in some ocnerodriles, see Jamieson 1958) cannot 

be ruled out. The microscolecin condition is seen, for instance, in Rhododrilus 

and, with complete fusion of male and prostate pores on segment 17, in 

Kayarmacia and in the circummundane parthenogenetic Microscolex dubius. 

The less common balantin condition (Figs. 8.8, 8.54C) was putatively 

derived by migration of the male pores onto segment 19 where they 

approached the single remaining, posterior, pair of prostate pores. This 

condition with male pores at intersegment 18/19 (and correspondingly a 

single pair of spermathecal pores, in 7/8) is seen in the Yucatan acanthodrile 

Balanteodrilus and was so derived by Pickford (1937) and is also seen in the 

New Zealand genus Sylvodrilus, in which the male pore remain on segment


18 (Lee 1959). The most extreme balantin reduction is seen in the 

acanthodrile Torresiella from Horn Island, Torres Strait, Australia, in which 

the male pores and those of the single pair of prostates are united on segment 

19 (with spermathecal pores in 7/8) and, as a further profound apomorphy, 

the nephridia are wholly meronephric (Dyne 1997). 

The strongly protuberant nature of the male pores in some acanthodriles 

suggests that in the acanthodrilin arrangement, the seminal grooves serve to 

pass prostatic secretion to the male pores rather than sperm to the prostate 

pores. However, the usual correlation of the number of pairs of spermathecal 

pores with the number of prostate pores might suggest the latter, commonly 

accepted, alternative. 

The megascolecin condition of the male pores (Figs. 8.8, 8.54D) is 

characteristic of the subfamily Megascolecinae. In the megascolecin 

condition, the male pores are united with the pores of a single pair of 

prostates on segment 18 or, in a presumably more plesiomorphic condition 

seen only in the New Caledonian genus Eudiplotrema, are near but not fused 

with the prostate pores (Jamieson and Bennett 1979). Michaelsen (1913) 

debated, and in Michaelsen (1928) remained equivocal, as to whether the 

megascolecin condition was acquired by migration of the remaining 

anterior or posterior pair of prostates of a former acanthodrilin condition 

onto segment 18. However, the possibility exists that the prostates of the 

megascolecin arrangement are plesiomorphically and intrinsically of that 

segment and, though not necessitated by this proposition, that they are 

persistent from a longer segmental series of prostates, possibly from a 

sexprostatic condition, with a pair of prostates in each of 17, 18 and 19. The 

latter, sexprostatic condition, though exceedingly rare, is known in the 

ocnerodrile, Diaphorodrilus doriae Cognetti (1910), the acanthodrile Pickfordia 

magnisetosa Omodeo (1958) and supposedly in the inadequately described 

Dichogaster damonis Beddard (1889b), from Fiji, the type species of Dichogaster, 

and has been reported in other Fijian and also in Caribbean Dichogasters 

(James, pers. com.; Jamieson et al., 2002) (Figs. 8.1, 8.6). 

The prostates are predominantly tubular in the Acanthodrilinae but they 

are tubuloracemose or even racemose in Dipotrema scheltingai and are 

racemose in Exxus Gates 1959. 

8.3 OOGENESIS 

Oogenesis in oligochaetes is intraovarian (Jamieson 1988a) (though 

considered extraovarian by Eckelbarger 1988) in that the germ cells are not 

released from the ovary into the coelom or a diverticulum of this, the ovisac, 

until they are ripe eggs (metaphase primary oocytes) and have completed 

vitellogenesis. Here they remain in metaphase of the first meiotic division 

and are released in this state from the female pores into the cocoon in which 

they are fertilized (see review by Jamieson 1981c). The size of the egg differs 

greatly between microdriles and crassiclitellates. Thus in microdriles the 

primary oocyte is very large, ranging from 300 µm to 1 mm, well within the


size range for so-called lecithotrophic eggs of polychaetes and other 

invertebrates, whereas in lumbricid earthworms primary oocytes reach 120 µm 

(see references in Jamieson 1988a), roughly in the range of planktotrophic 

eggs of polychaetes. The smaller size in megadriles is correlated with what 

is considered to be secondary acquisition of a multilayered clitellum, 

secretions of which, in the cocoon, reduce the necessity for reserves in the egg 

(Jamieson 1971b, 1988b). 

Intercellular bridges. Whereas connections between oocytes are rare in 

polychaetes (Eckelbarger 1988), in earthworms (Eisenia fetida) the oogonia 

and premeiotic primary oocytes are interconnected, each group developing 

from a single oogonium. The bridges each have the form of a fuzzy-coated 

zonula collaris as seen in spermatogenesis and at their confluence they 

constitute the cytophore. Homology of such structures between developing 

eggs and sperm is attributed to the hermaphroditic condition. It is inferred 

that the bridges permit synchronization of development of the gametes but 

the mechanism of information exchange is unknown (Jamieson 1988a). As 

shown for Enchytraeus and Tubifex, when the primary oocyte of an oligochaete 

is released into the coelom it is detached from the cytophore (see review by 

Jamieson 1981c). 

Vitellogenic Phase. Oligochaete vitellogenesis is already underway in 

the primary oocytes and in Enchytraeus albidus is said to begin in the third 

stage oogonium (Dumont 1969). It appears to be both autosynthetic and 

heterosynthetic; the distinction between the two being somewhat arbitrarily 

defined by the size of imported molecules. Heterosynthesis involves 

endocytosis (pinocytosis) as in polychaete eggs but some transference of yolk 

to the egg by chloragocytes occurs in enchytraeids (references in Jamieson 

1981c). Such mechanisms for rapid incorporation of yolk precursors are 

characteristic of species having semi-continuous reproductive periods with 

short periods of oogenesis and frequent egg-laying (Eckelbarger 1988), as is 

true of oligochaetes, as opposed to monotelic species. For evidence for autoand 

hetero-synthesis of vitelline materials see (Jamieson 1981c, 1988a; 

Siekierska 2003). 

Cortical granules. Conspicuous cortical granules seen in some 

polychaete eggs, are not characteristic of oligochaete eggs. The cortical zone 

of the Tubifex primary oocyte in the ovisac is 2-3 µm thick, containing 

mitochondria and RER, ribosomes, minute vesicles, multivesicular bodies 

(often open to the surface) and other components in a finely particulate 

matrix devoid of granules and lipid droplets. Yolk granules and lipid 

droplets are confined to the endoplasm (Shimizu 1976). 

Egg envelopes. Oolemmal microvilli first appear in Eisenia in the primary 

oocytes where they project into a newly acquired acellular sheath, the zona 

pellucida (ZP). The ZP is regarded as a thickened oocyte membrane, the 

chorion, by Lechenault (1968) and, with the microvilli, would therefore 

constitute a primary envelope sensu Eckelbarger (1988). However, the origin 

of the ZP requires further investigation. The ZP and microvilli may jointly be 

termed the vitelline envelope. The microvilli in the mature ovarian oocytes are


much shorter in microdriles (Enchytraeus albidus, Tubifex tubifex) than in 

crassiclitellates (Fig. 8.41). Their length has been shown in lumbricids to be 

strongly correlated with the length of the acrosome. They are illustrated for 

Allolobophora chlorotica in Fig. 8.41F,G and for Lumbricus rubellus in Figs. 

8.41H. In tangential section of the ZP of A. chlorotica (Fig. 8.41F) it is seen that 

the microvilli are interrupted by circular fenestrae (Jamieson et al. 1983); these 

are perhaps equivalent to multiple micropyles. There is no ZP in tubificid 

oocytes but an indistinct fibrillar ‘vitelline membrane’ is traversed by the 

short microvilli. After fertilization the vitelline membrane of the Tubifex egg, 

becomes a trilaminar fertilization membrane overlying a perivitelline space. 

The oolemma loses its microvilli. The detached microvilli reach outwards 

only to the middle layer, suggesting (unless they have retracted) that the outer 

layer of the fertilization membrane is added from extrinsic sources, possibly 

from the cocoon fluid (Shimizu 1976, see Jamieson 1981c). 

Nurse cells (as sterilized oocytes), seen in polychaetes (Eckelbarger 

1988), have not been reported in oligochaetes, excepting in a recent paper by 

Siekierska (2003). As only one or two embryos commonly develop in 

earthworm cocoons with sixteen or more eggs, the infertile eggs are 

effectively vitelline cells equivalent to those of neoophoran plathyhelminthes 

(Jamieson 1981c). Siekierska (2003), for the lumbricid Dendrobaena veneta 

reported the presence of nurse cells (trophocytes): the ovarian stroma is 

composed of somatic cells, the processes of which are connected to each other 

via numerous desmosomes; the somatic cells (identified as follicle cells sensu 

Jamieson) and their processes envelop the germ cells tightly and play a 

supportive role; oogonia, oocytes and trophocytes are arranged in distinct 

zones in the ovary; trophocytes form chains of cells, which are interconnected 

by intercellular bridges and contain numerous microtubules; the oocytes are 

distally arranged in the ovary. The function of the nurse cells in D. veneta has 

not been elucidated. There is evidence that trophocytes are mainly 

responsible for RNA (mainly rRNA) synthesis (references in Siekierska 2003), 

RNA being partly or fully synthesized in these cells and then transported to 

oocytes. They do not seem to be involved in vitellogenesis in D. veneta; the 

connections between oocytes and trophocytes no longer exist in ovarian zone 

III (mature oocytes) as the trophocytes degenerate (Siekierska 2003). That 

these trophocytes are distinct from follicle cells requires further investigation. 

Follicle cells. In Enchytraeus several layers of squamous epithelial cells 

(termed follicle cells by Jamieson 1981c but presumed to be modified 

peritoneal cells) cover the distal surfaces of the stage I and stage II oogonia. 

The stage III oogonium becomes covered distally and laterally by a thin, 

electron-dense layer derived from this epithelium by attenuation. Pillars of 

epithelial cytoplasm project towards the oogonial surface. 

Follicle cells also occur in lumbricids. In Eisenia fetida, they surround the 

primary oocyte at least while it retains its connection to the ovary. They are 

very much branched, with long slender processes forming several beds 

around the ZP, the more internal projecting into the latter. The projections in 

Enchytraeus and Eisenia do not establish connections with the egg. As


Fig. 8.41 contd


observed by Eckelbarger (1988) such follicle cells may have a supportive 

rather than nutritive role. In Enchytraeus, when the oocyte has entered the 

ovisac it has lost its follicle cells and this is presumably the case for the 

lumbricid egg (see reviews by Jamieson 1981c, 1988a, 1992). 

Oogenesis and phylogeny. The modes of oogenesis and vitellogenesis 

are of little value in determining the phylogenetic position of the Oligochaeta 

within the Annelida but they do not appear to show specializations which 

exclude regarding oligochaetes as being near the stem of the Annelida 

(Jamieson 1988a). 

8.4 SPERMATOGENESIS AND SPERMATOZOAL ULTRASTRUCTURE 

(MARCO FERRAGUTI AND BARRIE G.M. JAMIESON) 

8.4.1 Spermatogenesis 

Spermatogenesis refers to the process of cell division and differentiation that 

commences with the primordial germ cells (protogonia) and ends with 

production of the mature spermatozoa. The latter stage of the process, 

whereby the spermatids differentiate without division to produce 

spermatozoa, is distinguished as spermiogenesis. The first spermatogonial 

divisions occur in the testis. Division is synchronous and results in the 

development of groups of cells interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges (collars 

in Ferraguti and Lanzavecchia 1971; bridges in Martinucci et al. 1977; 

zonulae collaris in Jamieson 1978a) to form morulae (e.g. Jamieson 1981c, 

1992), also termed cysts (Ferraguti 1999). Collars surrounding the bridges are 

illustrated for mature spermatids of Haplotaxis ornamentus (Fig. 8.42H,I) and 

Eudrilus eugeniae (Fig. 8.43D). Further spermatogonial divisions, and 

spermiogenesis, may be limited to the coelom of the testis segment, as in 

Phreodrilidae, but usually occur in diverticula of the septa which project into 

adjacent segments and constitute the seminal vesicles. Development may also 

occur in specialized compartments of the testis segments, termed testis-sacs, 

present in combination with seminal vesicles, as in lumbricids and many 

megascolecids. The many variations on these themes are beyond the scope 

of this volume but details are given by Jamieson (1981c, 1992). Light 

microscopical observations on spermatogenesis in the megascolecids 

Amynthas hawayanus, A. morrisi and Metaphire californica are given by de Majo 

(2002a,b). 

The spermatogonia differ from oogonia in lacking smooth ER (present, 

however, in spermatids, see Boi et al. 2001), which is mostly situated 


Fig. 8.41. A-E. Acrosome and proximal portion of the nucleus of spematozoa of Lumbricidae in longitudinal 

section. A. Eisenia fetida. B. Lumbricus castaneus. C. Allolobophora longa. D. L. rubellus. E. A. 

chlorotica. F-H. Zona pellucida of unfertilized primary oocytes of Lumbricidae. F. Allolobophora chlorotica. 

In near-tangential section, showing fenestrae between the microvilli of the ZP. G, H. In vertical section, 

showing microvilli and portion of adjacent oocyte. G. Allolobophora chlorotica. H. Lumbricus rubellus. Based 

on the study of Jamieson B. G. M. et al. 1983. Gamete Research 8: 149-169.


Fig. 8.42 contd


peripherally in the oogonia. The number of nuclei will increase stage by stage 

following powers of two. Thus morulae with 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 (sometimes 

more) cells will be found. When the spermatogonial morula or follicle has 

reached the 8-32 cell stage, the region of confluence becomes a common 

cytoplasmic mass, the early cytophore. The spermatogonial morulae released 

from the testes into the coelom, or into modifications of this such as testissacs 

or seminal vesicles, possess only small cytophores (see Eudrilus eugeniae, 

Fig. 8.43A,B). In microdriles (Branchiura sowerbyi) (Hirao 1973) and 

earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris) (Walsh 1954) division of spermatogonia of 

the 16 cell morula gives the 32 primary spermatocytes. These are 

distinguished from spermatogonia, whose divisions are mitotic, in 

subsequently undergoing a meiotic reductional division, the first maturation 

division. In oligochaetes spermatocytes are smaller than spermatogonia, as 

there is a precocious enlargement of late spermatogonia. The products of 

reductional division of the diploid primary spermatocytes (usually 32) are 

haploid secondary spermatocytes (usually 64) (Hirao 1973). The cytophore 

further enlarges. 

The second non-reductional meiotic division of the haploid secondary 

spermatocytes produces similarly haploid spermatids, 128 in most of the 

oligochaete species studied (Jamieson 1981c), but 256 in two different 

lumbriculids (Ferraguti 1999) and more than 400 in some cysts, considered 

atypical, of the phreodrilid Astacopsidrilus (=Phreodrilus) (Jamieson 1981b). 

The spermatids transform into spermatozoa without further divisions 

(details in Jamieson 1981c, 1992; Ferraguti 1999). After detachment of the 

spermatozoa (Martinucci et al. 1977) or shortly before this in the tubificid 

Limnodriloides (Jamieson and Daddow 1979) and in Astacopsidrilus (Jamieson 

1981b), the cytophore becomes globular (see Eudrilus eugeniae, Fig. 8.43C) and 

disintegrates. 

Functions of the cytophore. These are deduced to include support and 

synchronization of germinal cells through the interconnecting bridges. Boi 

et al. (2001) have shown that the bridges are kept open by actin rings. When 

the actin is de-polymerized by the end of spermiogenesis, some nuclei slip 


Fig. 8.42. Haplotaxis ornamentus. Spermiogenesis by transmission electron microscopy. A. Transverse 

section (TS) through condensing nucleus of spermatid, surrounded by the micrtoubular manchette. B. Golgi 

apparatus of spermatid, showing a Golgi lamella contributing to the developing acrosome vesicle.C. 

Acrosome developing an acrosome tube. D. TS distal centriole with satellite rays of anchoring apparatus. 

E. TS axoneme showing tetragon arrangement at central singlets. F. Developing acrosome and midpiece 

accompanied by Golgi apparatus. G. Spermatid nucleus surrounded by microtubular manchette. H. 

Longitudinal section of a younjg spermatid, showing collar attaching it to cytophore, Golgi apparatus, 

undondensed nucleus, proximal and distal centrioles, and flagellum. I. Part of a cytophore, containing 

rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) stacks, and attached spermatids. J. Detail of RER. Abbreviations: at, 

acrosome tube; av, acrosome vesicle; co, collar attaching spermatid to cytophore; cy, cytophore; dc, 

distal centriole; f, flagellum; g, Golgi apparatus; gl, Golgi lamella; m, mitochondria of midpiece; mt, 

microtubules; n, nucleus; nm, nuclear membrane; pc, proximal centriole; rer, rough endoplasmic reticulum. 

From Jamieson, unpublished.


Fig. 8.43 contd


inside the cytophore. The bridges possibly also play an active role in 

migration of cell elements into the cytophore as evidenced by the abundant 

cytoskeletal elements and mitochondria, as energy transducers, on the 

cytophore side. This includes selective intake of cell organelles not required 

for further spermiohistogenesis such as ribosomes, chromatoid bodies, 

fibrillar clumps, smooth endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi body after it has 

completed its secretory phase, multivesicular and lysosomal bodies, and 

mitochondria other than the midpiece set. Nuclear projections into the 

cytophore may provide a means of discarding nucleoplasm or, it is 

speculated (Jamieson 1981c), transmitting genetic instructions into the 

cytophore. The large number of mitochondria in the cytophore suggests that 

it has an important function in providing energy to the developing 

spermatids as it seems unlikely that the mitochondria of the midpiece 

precursor fulfill the total energy requirements of these cells. The cytophore 

at the second meiotic division has a volume which is at least twenty-two 

times that of the spermatogonial stage (Eudrilus eugeniae, Fig. 8.43C). This is 

taken as evidence of much endogenous synthesis of materials. Organelles 

are, clearly, synthesized. Some of them, including RER, remain in the 

cytophore but it has been suggested that materials involved in cell 

morphogenesis (precursors of manchette microtubules and of sperm tails) 

and in energy production (glycogen of sperm tail) probably countermigrate 

into the spermatids. It is also suggested that the great increase in size, and 

synthesis of materials, of the cytophore are mediated by transcription 

products emitted from the nucleus in the cell cytoplasm at earlier, 

protogonial and spermatogonial, stages (Martinucci and Felluga 1975; 

Martinucci et al. 1977). The transcription products are possibly represented 

by the chromatoid bodies and fibrillar mitochondria-associated material 


Fig. 8.43. Eudrilus eugeniae (Eudrilidae). Stages in spermatogenesis by TEM. A. Morula of primary 

spermatocytes in metaphase. B. Morula of young spermatids, with some enlargement of the cytophore. C. 

Morula of elongated spermatids, with rounded cytophore (penetrated by a spermatozoon); spermatids with 

condensed nuclei in each of which an endonuclear canal has developed. D. Detail of late morula showing 

spermatid attached to the cytophore by a collar, microtubules surrounding the nucleus with its endonuclear 

canal. E. Transverse sections of nuclei of advanced spermatids and of a midpiece, both structures 

surrounded by microtubules. F. Longitudinal section (LS) of an elongating spermatid. The developing 

acrosome, being secreted by the Golgi apparatus, is still basal, near the distal centriole which has satellite 

rays. The mitochondria are assembling at the base of the nucleus. G. LS of an earlier spermatid. The 

acrosome rudiment shows a short acrosome tube and, within this, a shorter secondary tube. Mitochondria 

are assembling as the midpiece. The satellite apparatus of the distal centriole is visible as a ‘muff’ at the 

base of the axoneme. H. Later acrosome adjacent to the Golgi apparatus which has dense secretions at 

the ends of its lamellae. Beneath the dome-shaped acrosome vesicle there are two dense granules and a 

slender secondary acrosome tube. Outside the latter is the elongating acrosome tube. I. More advanced 

acrosome with more elongated acrosome tube. Abbreviations: at, acrosome tube; av, acrosome vesicle; 

ch, chromosomes; co, collar; cy, cytophore; dc, distal centriole; ec, endonuclear canal; f, flagellum; g, 

Golgi apparatus; m, mitochondria of midpiece; mt, manchette; n, nucleus; nm, nuclear membrane; sc, 

primary spermatocyte; sec, secondary tube; st, spermatid. From Jamieson, unpublished.


(Martinucci et al. 1977). Finally, the cytophore may play a part in separation 

of the spermatozoa and its own lysis (see reviews by Jamieson 1981c; 1992; 

Ferraguti 1999). 

Origin of early acrosome rudiments. The history of the complex and 

sometimes confused terminology of the components of the acrosome and of 

their development is treated in detail by Jamieson (1981c). Only a brief 

outline can be given here. 

The earliest anlage of the acrosome vesicle in oligochaetes originates 

from the Golgi apparatus of the spermatid, as the proacrosome. It becomes 

a small cap-shaped (concavoconvex) vesicle containing electron-dense 

material, the acrosome vesicle, as in Haplotaxis ornamentus (Fig. 8.42B,C,F). 

In all species studied it moves to the outer side of the Golgi under the 

plasmalemma, the latter becoming convex as a ‘’bleb”, over it. Additional 

Golgi vesicles may fuse with it during this migration (see review by Jamieson 

1981c). Figure 8.42B is unique among published micrographs in showing an 

entire Golgi lamella fusing with the developing acrosome vesicle in H. 

ornamentus; this probably involves active movement of the lamellae. 

The second early anlage of the acrosome consists of one to several 

electron densities or granules, which develop immediately below the 

acrosome vesicle. 

A third structure which appears very early in development of the 

acrosome is the acrosome tube, as in Haplotaxis ornamentus (Fig. 8.42C,F) and 

Eudrilus eugeniae (Fig. 8.43G,H,I). This is a diagnostic autapomorphy of 

clitellates. It develops below the acrosome vesicle and, while growing in 

length, migrates with the vesicle to the tip of the nucleus which has 

undergone elongation and condensation. Its origin has been attributed, 

from micrographs, to the subacrosome granule(s), and/or directly to 

lamellae or vesicles originating from the Golgi apparatus (as in H. 

ornamentus, Fig. 8.42) and Limnodriloides or, questionably, to the proximal 

centriole (for a detailed discussion see Jamieson 1981c). 

A fourth major component of the acrosome complex termed the secondary 

tube (periaxial sheath), appears shortly before the axial rod makes its 

appearance. This is a short sleeve-like tube which appears in Lumbricus to 

develop from the base of the dense subacrosomal granule. It is attached as 

its apical end to the encircling rim formed by the bounding membrane of the 

primary acrosome vesicle and lies within the acrosome tube. 

Jamieson (1981c) proposed that in oligochaetes the acrosome vesicle, the 

dense granules, the acrosome tube and (indirectly) the secondary tube are all 

products of the Golgi apparatus but that the sequence of development of the 

granules and tube is variable. 

In the final stages of acrosome morphogenesis the acrosome vesicle is 

withdrawn except for its terminal domed tip, into the acrosome tube, or in 

enchytraeids, capilloventrids, and some tubificid species remains external. 

Differentiation of a fifth major component, the acrosome rod (axial rod), the 

putative perforatorium also occurs. This rod is already present inside the 

basal invagination of the vesicle in the earthworms but in the lumbriculid


oligochaete Bythonomus lemani (see description below) differentiation of the 

rod occurs when the vesicle is already withdrawn. The rod probably 

develops from the dense granule(s) in all oligochaetes (see Jamieson 1981c, 

1992; Ferraguti 1983, 1999). 

Migration of the acrosome from its origin at the Golgi apparatus to its 

emplacement on the tip of the nucleus occurs outside the microtubular 

manchette and without any association with microtubules (MTs). However, 

after its emplacement on the nucleus the manchette, which surrounds the 

nucleus, extends anteriorly to ensheath the acrosome tube and elongation of 

the acrosome occurs within the manchette. It seems possible that the MTs 

play a part in the later morphogenesis of the acrosome (see Jamieson 1981c). 

Some details of acrosome structure in the investigated oligochaete 

families are given below in 8.4.2. 

Nuclear morphogenesis. The nucleus of clitellate male germ cells is a 

long, filiform structure in the mature spermatozoa, but is rounded, as is the 

cell, in early, so-called isodiametric spermatids. Nuclear morphogenesis 

consists in the transformation of the nucleus from the spheroidal to the 

elongate, cylindroid form, and in the condensation of its chromatin, 

accompanied by major modifications of the microtubules present in the 

spermatid cytoplasm. The microtubules first appear, during early 

spermiogenesis in the vicinity of the distal centriole and later surround the 

nucleus as the manchette which is at first circumferentially discontinuous 

but becomes continuous (see Haplotaxis ornamentus, Fig. 8.42A,G; Eudrilus 

eugeniae, Fig. 8.43D,E). That the manchette controls nuclear elongation and 

chromatin condensation has been the subject of much debate (see, for 

instance, Fawcett et al. 1971; Ferraguti and Lanzavecchia 1971; Lora Lamia 

Donin and Lanzavecchia 1974; Webster and Richards 1977; Jamieson and 

Daddow 1979; Martinucci and Felluga 1979; Troyer 1980; Jamieson 1981c; 

Ferraguti and Ruprecht 1992; Ferraguti 1999). This subject cannot be revisited 

here. Suffice it to say that with the progress of spermiogenesis, the diameter 

of the nucleus decreases, as does the number of microtubules forming the 

manchette (Jamieson and Daddow 1979; Hodgson and Jamieson 1992). The 

microtubules discarded from the manchette are found in the cytoplasm of the 

spermatids, and are later discarded with the residual cytoplasm. 

Origin of the midpiece. Posterior to the nucleus, and approximately as 

wide as its base, are the mitochondria of the midpiece. The mitochondria are 

cristate but are radially adpressed; where several occur, they form a cartwheel 

configuration in cross section (Haplotaxis ornamentus, Fig. 8.42F; Eudrilus 

eugeniae, Fig. 8.43E). The fact that in ontogeny of the spermatozoon the 

midpiece originates as two to 11 separate, rounded mitochondria and that 

little elongation occurs in most tubificids suggests that a short untorted 

midpiece is plesiomorphic. There are seven mitochondria in the 

spermatozoon of Branchiobdella, and there is one in that of leeches. As four 

is the most common number in “primitive” sperm this has been somewhat 

arbitrarily assumed to be the basic number for oligochaete sperm, with 

divergence to two in Tubifex and a maximum of 11 in Capilloventer (see


Jamieson 1981c; Ferraguti 1999). However, as Capilloventer appears to be the 

most basal oligochaete it is possible that many parallel mitochondria is the 

plesiomophric condition. 

Transformation of the centrioles. As reveiwed by Ferraguti (1999), two 

centrioles with the conventional ultrastructure of nine microtubular triplets 

are present only in the very early euclitellate spermatids (Jamieson 1981c), 

as here shown for Haplotaxis ornamentus (Fig. 8.42H). Soon after, the proximal 

centriole disappears. A remnant of the proximal centriole is said to make 

contact with the base of the nucleus just before the clustering of the midpiece 

mitochondria (Gatenby and Dalton 1959). The fate of the proximal centriole 

has never been followed in detail, but its topographical, if not causational, 

importance as a center for aggregation of the midpiece mitochondria has been 

repeatedly demonstrated (Ferraguti and Jamieson 1984). 

Very early in spermiogenesis the distal centriole produces the flagellum 

when it is connected to the plasma membrane of the spermatid through a 

complex nine-rayed structure, as in Haplotaxis ornamentus (Fig. 8.42D) and 

Eudrilus eugeniae (Fig. 8.43F), identical with the anchoring apparatus of 

‘primitive’ spermatozoa, i.e. those fertilizing in sea water. The anchoring 

apparatus disappears progressively as spermiogenesis continues. It has been 

supposed that the anchoring apparatus in mature spermatozoa loses its 

function, since the basal body is constrained by the midpiece (Ferraguti 

1984a,b). 

In mature sperm the remnants of the anchoring apparatus assume the 

shape of a ring or a cylinder of dense material placed under the plasma 

membrane (annuloid in Jamieson 1982) which may involve the basal body 

microtubules, as in tubificid oligochaetes and in branchiobdellids or be 

discontinuous and irregular as in leeches or in megascolecid oligochaetes 

(Jamieson 1978a). 

The basal body never shows a conventional triplet appearance in the 

mature oligochaete spermatozoon. Tannic acid treatment reveals 

microtubular doublets surrounded by dense material (Ferraguti and Gelder 

1991). In the oligochaetes the basal cylinder is a structure with a diameter 

ranging from 60 to 100 nm and a length from 0.1 to 0.3 µm from which the 

central apparatus of the flagellum emerges (Ferraguti 1999). It makes its 

appearance in the early spermiogenetic stages and elongates to fill, to a 

variable extent, the basal body (Ferraguti 1984a). In branchiobdellids, 

hirudineans, and acanthobdellids, all lacking a basal cylinder, the basal 

body is progressively penetrated by the central apparatus of the axoneme 

from the early spermiogenetic stages. The central apparatus reaches the 

mitochondrion in acanthobdellids and leeches, or even penetrates into the 

midpiece axis, as in branchiobdellids. 

Modifications of the flagellum. The flagellum of the early euclitellate 

spermatids has a conventional 9+2 appearance. During spermiogenesis, the 

basic structure is modified by the appearance of glycogen granules 

surrounding the axonemal doublets, and by the transformations of the 

central apparatus, as in Haplotaxis ornamentatus (Fig. 8.42E). The glycogen


granules appear in the mid-spermatids to surround the axoneme for almost 

its complete length, so that only the terminal portion of the euclitellate 

flagella has the conventional 9+2 appearance. The central apparatus of the 

flagellum may be modified by ‘tetragon fibers’ (two fibers at right angles to 

the two central singlets) (Fig. 8.42E) or by the prominent central sheath. In 

some oligochaete species, the tetragon fibers grow into the central apparatus 

of mid-spermatids (Jamieson 1981a); in others, the tetragon fibers are 

replaced (or embedded?) in later stages by the prominent central sheath. This 

process has been followed in detail in the tubificid Monopylephorus limosus 

(Ferraguti 1999) and proceeds from the basal towards the distal portion of the 

flagellum. In some oligochaete species (for instance in the tubificid 

Coralliodrilus rugosus, see Erséus and Ferraguti 1995) a mixture of the two 

modifications of the central apparatus is present in the mature spermatozoa: 

the basal portion of the flagellum shows a prominent central sheath 

appearance, whereas a more distal portion shows the tetragon fibers, and a 

short final tract has a 9+2 appearance without any modification of the central 

apparatus. The branchiobdellids, acanthobdellids, and leeches, show the 

progressive involvement of the central tubules by the prominent central 

sheath (Ferraguti and Lanzavecchia 1977). 

8.4.2 Mature Spermatozoa 

The Clitellata (Oligochaeta sensu lato) possess only introsperm (terminology 

of Rouse and Jamieson 1987), i.e., sperm that are not introduced into the 

ambient water if the species is aquatic and are usually (obligatorily in 

leeches) internally fertilizing, though in most oligochaetes fertilization occurs 

external to the body, in the cocoon. 

The spermatozoa of the Clitellata are filiform cells characterized by (1) 

the presence of an acrosome tube containing and/or supporting the 

acrosome vesicle which is often withdrawn into it; (2) interpolation of the 

mitochondria between the nucleus and the basal body of the flagellum; (3) 

peculiar modifications of the central apparatus of the axoneme and (4) two 

glycogen granules per doublet cross section (Jamieson 1981c). The 

oligochaetes sensu stricto are diagnosed by the presence of a basal cylinder 

situated within the basal body which is lost in brachiobdellids and leeches 

(Ferraguti 1984a,b; Ferraguti and Erséus 1999); the branchiobdellidans by an 

apical, conical indentation of the nucleus and by a helical marginal fiber 

coiled around the tail; the acanthobdellids by a dense sheath and accessory 

fibers surrounding the axoneme; the euhirudineans by an anterior 

prolongation of the acrosome tube (Jamieson 1978c, 1981b,c, 1982, 1983a,b,c, 

1984, 1986, 1987, 1988a ,b, 1992; Jamieson et al. 1978, 1982, 1987; Ferraguti 

1983, 1999; Ferraguti and Erséus 1999). Some caveats apply to these 

characteristic features. The acrosome tube though highly distinctive, being 

unknown in polychaetes, occurs convergently, though only superficially 

similar, in nematomorphs (Valvassori et al. 1999). It is reduced or possibly 

absent in Bathydrilus formosus, a phallodriline tubificid (Ferraguti et al. 1989). 

Interpolated mitochondria also occur in Onychophora, with possible


phylogenetic implications (Jamieson 1986) and, with no phylogenetic 

significance, in Chondrichthyes (Jamieson 1991) and in some gastrotrichs 

(Ferraguti et al. 1995). Similarly distributed glycogen is seen, convergently, in 

the polychaete Micromaldane (Rouse and Jamieson 1987). 

The clitellate spermatozoal synapomorphies of possession of an 

acrosome tube and interpolation of the midpiece between nucleus and distal 

centriole do not occur in Aeolosoma and Potamodrilus, thus confirming that 

aphanoneurans are not clitellates (Bunke 1985, 1986). A combined 

immunohistochemical and ultrastructural investigation of the central 

nervous system and the sense organs in Aeolosoma hemprichi (Hessling and 

Purschke 2000) also indicated that aphanoneurans could not be included in 

the Clitellata. Some molecular cladograms based on three combined genes, 

two nuclear (18S, 28S) and one mitochondrial (COI), gees placed Aeolosoma 

as the sister-taxon of the Clitellata (Hugall et al. unpublished) (Fig. 8.5). 

However, Struck et al. (2002) found that 18S rDNA sequences did not 

unequivocally support a sister-group relationship of Aeolosoma sp. and the 

Clitellata. Instead, depending on the algorithms applied, Aeolosoma clustered 

in various clades within the polychaetes, for instance, together with 

eunicidan species, the Dinophilidae, Harmothoe impar or Nereis limbata. 

Although spermaozoal ultrastructure asserts monophyly of the Clitellata, 

it does not prove monophyly of the oligochaetes sensu stricto and, though not 

conflicting with monophyly of the latter, it could equally support the view 

that oligochaetes sensu stricto are a paraphyletic congeries, as indicated by 

molecular data (see 8.1.2 above). The constantly present basal cylinder, 

though distinctive of oligochaetes, is presumably plesiomorphic. A 

generalized, plesiomorphic oligochaete spermatozoon is illustrated in Fig. 

8.44 to aid in understanding of the components of a mature spermatozoon. 

Regarding major departures from general oligochaete sperm 

characteristics, only the eudrilid Eudrilus eugeniae (Jamieson and Daddow 

1992) and the tubiificid Rhizodrilus russus (Ferraguti et al. 1994) are known 

to have an endonuclear canal. In members of the subfamily Tubificinae, and 

some Limnodriloidinae, a double sperm line produces euspermatozoa and 

paraspermatozoa (Braidotti et al. 1980; Braidotti and Ferraguti 1982, 1983; 

Ferraguti et al. 1983, 1988, 1989, 1994, 2002b; Ferraguti and Ruprecht 1992; 

Boi et al. 2001; Marotta et al. 2003). 

An account follows on the ultrastructure of spermatozoa in those 

oligochaete families for which it has been investigated. 

Enchytraeidae. Lumbricillus rivalis has a simple, short acrosome, with the 

vesicle external to the tube, a well developed secondary tube, a stout rod, a 

basal chamber, and a limen (Webster and Richards 1977) (Fig. 8.45A). These 

characters have been considered to make the enchytraeid acrosome the most 

primitive oligochaete spermatozoon examined (Jamieson 1983a), though this 

status is now questionable in view of molecular phylogeny discussed above 

in 8.1.4. The nucleus is apically flanged and basally straight; the four 

mitochondria (six in one Mesenchytraeus species, Ferraguti and Fender 

unpublished) are twisted; the flagellum has a long basal cylinder and an


Fig. 8.44. Diagrammatic longitudinal section of generalized, plesiomorphic oligochaete sperm to illustrate 

chief components. From Jamieson, B. G. M. et al. 1987. Cladistics 3(2): 145-155.Fig. 3. 

axoneme with a tract with a prominent central sheath followed by one with 

tetragon fibers (Fig. 9 in Webster and Richards 1977). 

A profound comparative study on 19 different populations and species 

of Enchytraeus (Westheide et al. 1991) has confirmed the above description, 

except for the absence or extreme reduction of the basal chamber in the 

acrosome and for the nucleus being flanged (or corkscrew-shaped) for the 

whole length. Significant metric differences allowed the identification of the 

various populations and species.


Fig. 8.45. Longitudinal section of a spermatozoon by TEM of A. An enchytraeid (Lumbricillus rivalis). B. 

A tubificid (Rhyacodrilus arthingtonae). 1. acrosome vesicle, 2. subvesicular space, 3. acrosome tube, 4. 

secondary tube, 5. axial rod (perforatorium), 6. nuclear pad, 7. nucleus, 8. capitulum, 9. connective, 10. 

midpiece, 11. proximal core of axoneme. From Jamieson, B.G. M. 1983. Zoologica Scripta 12: 107-14, 

Fig. 1.


The morphometric and qualitative spermatozoal data were used 

(Westheide et al. 1991) as morphologic taxonomic characters, as discussed in 

8.1.5. Their analysis confirmed the value of sperm ultrastructure for solving 

taxonomical problems at the species level (Westheide et al. 1991). 

Capilloventridae. The acrosome of the spermatozoon of the Australian 

freshwater Capilloventer australis (Fig. 8.46) is similar to that of enchytraeids, 

and putatively plesiomorphic, in having the vesicle completely external to the 

tube, but differs in lacking a secondary tube and a limen. The nucleus is 

again similar to that of enchytraeids, but C. australis has the condition, 

known in no other clitellate, of eleven mitochondria arranged longitudinally 

in parallel (not radially) in the midpiece. It is uncertain whether this is 

autapomorphic or plesiomorphic. The basal cylinder is very long, as in 

Enchytraeidae, but the tail shows only the prominent central sheath pattern 

(Ferraguti et al. 1996). 

Phreodrilidae. The spermatozoon (Fig. 8.47A) of Astacopsidrilus 

(=Phreodrilus) jamiesoni, epizoic on an Australian freshwater crayfish 

(Jamieson 1981b), has a long undulating acrosome tube, with the vesicle only 

partly withdrawn, a small acrosome rod (perforatorium), a short secondary 

tube, a large basal chamber, a putative nuclear pad, an undulating nucleus, 

six helical mitochondria forming the unusually long (9 µm) midpiece, and a 

tail with prominent central sheath basally and tetragon fibers distally. The 

acrosome resembles that of some crassiclitellates, thus falling among them in 

the phylogenetic analysis. The sperm of Insulodrilus bifidus is similar in most 

respects: even longer midpiece; nuclear shape; six mitochondria; prominent 

central sheath and and tetragon fibres but the acrosome tube is less that 1 

µm long, slightly bent to one side, has a limen, and a short basal chamber 

and the vesicle is completely withdrawn (Marotta, pers. comm.). Phreodrilids 

are suspected of having internal fertilization, which is rare among 

oligochaetes, occurring elsewhere in Eudrilidae (Jamieson et al. 1987), and 

this possibly accounts for the unusual acrosomal morphology in both taxa. 

Tubificidae. This account is drawn from the review of Ferraguti (1999). 

The Tubificidae is the most speciose microdrile family (about 600 species) 

and shows the greatest diversity in sperm morphologies. Variations 

concerning all the characters were reviewed in detail for 17 species by 

Erséus and Ferraguti (1995) and Ferraguti et al. (1994). A list of all examined 

species is given in Ferraguti (1999). 

A generalized tubificid sperm based on Limnodriloides australis is 

illustrated in Fig. 8.45B. The acrosome tube may be straight as in Tubificinae 

and Limnodriloidinae, or bent, as in the rhyacodriline Monopylephorus 

limosus and in the gutless phallodrilines, or twisted, as in the phallodriline 

Thalassodrilus prostatus. The acrosome tube has, in M. limosus, a crystalline 

appearance in negative staining (period of 4.7 nm). The vesicle can be 

completely external, as in Thalassodrilus prostatus or in Limnodriloides sp., 

partly withdrawn, as in Rhyacodrilus arthingtonae (Jamieson et al. 1978) or in 

the Tubificinae, or completely withdrawn, as in M. limosus. A large basal 

chamber is present, as in Thalassodrilus prostatus or absent, as in M. limosus.


Fig. 8.46. Capilloventer australis (Capilloventridae). Ultrastructure of the spermatozoon. From Ferraguti et 

al. 1996. The spermatozoon of Capilloventer australis and the systematic position of the Capilloventridae 

(Annelida: Oligochaeta). Australian Journal of Zoology 44(5): 469-478, Fig. 1.


Fig. 8.47. Longitudinal section of a spermatozoon by TEM of A. A phreodrilid (Astacopsidrilus 

(=Phreodrilus) jamiesoni). B. A haplotaxid (Haplotaxis ornamentus). C. A sparganophilid (Sparganophilus 

tamesis). D. A hormogastrid (Hormogaster redii). E. A lumbricid (Lumbricus rubellus). F. A megascoelcid 

(Fletcherodrilus unicus). G. A megascolecid (Amynthas gracilis). 1. acrosome vesicle, 2. subvesicular 

space, 3. acrosome tube, 4. secondary tube, 5. axial rod (perforatorium), 6. nuclear pad, 7. nucleus, 8. 

capitulum, 9. connective, 10. midpiece, 11. proximal core of axoneme. From Jamieson, B. G. M. 1983. 

Zoologica Scripta 12: 107-14, Fig. 2. 

Some acrosome tubes have a limen, others are simple. In Tubifex tubifex 

eusperm, and in M. limosus, the plasma membrane at the level of the tube 

shows a characteristic array of particles. 

In tubificid sperm, the nucleus is never straight for its whole length, but 

can be in part straight, or twisted, or corkscrew-shaped, or flanged , or with 

regions with different shapes. The midpiece mitochondria vary in number 

from two (Tubifex tubifex) to five (all the Phallodrilinae), and in shape from 

hemispherical (in T. tubifex) to radial sectors of a cylinder, as in Clitellio 

arenarius. When elongated, the mitochondria can also be helical, as in 

Pectinodrilus molestus or in Coralliodrilus rugosus. The axoneme can have the 

prominent central sheath, or the tetragon fibers, or both in sequence (Erséus


and Ferraguti 1995). The plasma membrane of tubificid sperm tails is 

characterized by the possession of zipper lines, i.e. nine parallel double rows 

of particles at the level of the axonemal doublets (Ferraguti et al. 1991). 

Besides the zipper lines all rhyachodriline sperm tails, except in Rhizodrilus 

russus, also have “muffs” (Ferraguti et al. 1991, and Marotta, unpublished), 

double rows of particles running perpendicular to the zipper lines. The 

interplay between zipper lines, muffs, and other membrane structures gives 

rise to a complex model of the periaxonemal area. 

The considerable variation of sperm models within tubificids may be the 

consequence of the great species differentiation within the family. However, 

no other microdrile family has been analyzed in such detail. A high amount 

of structural homoplasy was detected in a cladistic analysis (Erséus and 

Ferraguti 1995). 

Naidinae. The spermatozoa of the naidines Paranais litoralis, Nais 

communis and Slavina appendiculata (Gluzman 1998, 1999), Stylaria lacustris 

and two species of Paranais (Ferraguti et al. 1999) have the usual oligochaete 

sperm components Paranais litoralis has a straight nucleus, five midpiece 

mitochondria and a complex flagellum with prominent central sheath. Nais 

communis, on the other hand, has a twisted nucleus and, questionably, only 

one mitochondrion. The spermatozoon of Slavina appendiculata has a 

‘corkscrew’ nucleus, 5 or 6 mitochondria in the usual radial arrangement. 

The axonemes have the tetragon fiber configuration (Gluzman 1998, 1999). 

In Stylaria lacustris (and two species of Paranais, see Ferraguti et al. 1999) 

the acrosome is short and straight, with the vesicle withdrawn, no secondary 

tube, and the acrosome rod barely visible. The nucleus is twisted for most of 

its length, but basally straight. There are five parallel mitochondria, and a tail 

with prominent central sheath basally and tetragon fibers distally. This 

description is confirmed for Unicnais uncinata (Marotta, pers. comm.). The 

ultrastructure of the naid spermatozoon is consistent with inclusion of 

Naididae within the Tubificidae (Erséus 1990), as the Naidinae (Erséus and 

Gustavsson 2002). 

Lumbriculidae. Ultrastructural descriptions exist for the spermatozoa of 

Bythonomus lemani (Ferraguti and Jamieson 1987) (Fig. 8.48), Kinkaidiana sp., 

Rhynchelmis limosella, R. alyonae (Martin et al. 1998), R. brachicephala (Ferraguti 

et al. 1999) and an undetermined species from Lake Baikal (Ferraguti 1999). 

The acrosome is short, bent to one side, with the vesicle deeply withdrawn, 

well developed rod, secondary tube with possible connections to the rod, no 

basal chamber, no limen, and possibly the tube closed at its base (or a nuclear 

pad fused with the tube?). The nucleus is twisted for the whole length 

(Bythonomus and Rhynchelmis alyonae) or apically corkscrew-shaped and 

basally straight (Kinkaidiana), or completely straight as in R. brachicephala. In 

all Rhynchelmis species examined so far there is a deep apical concavity at 

the apex of the nucleus. In Kinkaidiana sp. there is also an apical concavity 

reminiscent of that present in most Branchiobdellidae and, possibly, in some 

leeches, a feature consistent with molecular phylogeny. There are six, highly 

twisted mitochondria in the lumbriculid midpiece, and a prominent central


Fig. 8.48. Bythonomus lemani (Lumbriculidae). Longitudinal section of a spermatozoon by TEM. From 

Ferraguti, M. and Jamieson, B. G. M. 1987. Hydrobiologia 155: 123-134, Fig. 23.


sheath in Rhynchelmis and Kinkaidiana, but a sequence of prominent central 

sheath and tetragon fibers in the axoneme in Bythonomus lemani. 

Haplotaxidae. The spermatozoa of the Tasmanian Haplotaxis ornamentus 

(Jamieson 1982) (Fig. 8.47B) and Pelodrilus leruthi, a subterranean species 

living in the Pyrenées, are substantially similar to each other (Ferraguti 1999). 

There is a long acrosome tube, and a comparatively small vesicle, only partly 

withdrawn into the tube. A thin acrosome rod with an apical enlargement 

(capitulum sensu Jamieson 1978a) is housed in the subacrosomal space, 

leaving a large basal chamber. A secondary tube is connected to the rod in 

Haplotaxis, but not so evidently in Pelodrilus. The tube ends with a limen in 

Pelodrilus, but is possibly closed in Haplotaxis. A flat nuclear pad separates 

the acrosome tube from the straight nucleus. Six mutually parallel 

mitochondria follow, and a flagellum with tetragon fibers. The two species 

examined are distant in space and phylogeny, thus the haplotaxid sperm 

models appear remarkably uniform. 

Sparganophilidae. The acrosome tube of the spermatozoon of 

Sparganophilus tamensis, investigated by Jamieson et al. (1982) (Fig. 8.47C), is 

characterized by a long basal chamber ending proximally against a large 

limen and distally with the basal extremity of the vesicle. This vesicle is only 

partly withdrawn into the tube, projecting anteriorly as a bleb. The acrosome 

rod is contained within the subacrosomal space and partly projects outside 

the tube anteriorly. A short secondary tube surrounds the base of the rod. In 

Sparganophilus, as in the ‘higher’ families described below, the secondary 

tube has two clearly distinct parts: a cylinder surrounding the proximal 

extremity of the rod, and an oblique connection between the cylinder and the 

proximal extremity of the acrosome vesicle. 

A nuclear pad with a central boss separates the acrosome from the 

straight nucleus. The midpiece is formed by eight parallel mitochondria, 

two of which are in line, one over the other. The flagellum has the typical 

tetragon fibers of the megadriles, as well as the usual glycogen granules. 

Ocnerodrilidae. The spermatozoon of the peregrine ocnerodrilid species 

Nematogenia panamensis is 35 µm long and shows the conventional clitellate 

sequence of acrosome, nucleus, middle piece and tail. The acrosome is 

asymmetric, showing an acrosome rod crossing the vesicle to nearly touch 

the tube, and re-crossing the vesicle anteriorly. This condition is unique 

among investigated euclitellates, as is the structure of the acrosome tube, 

which seems to be decorated by longitudinal spiral furrows. The secondary 

tube and the limen are similar to those of other earthworms. The nucleus is 

straight as are the six midpiece mitochondria. The flagellum has one of the 

two usual oligochaete arrangements: a 9+2 axoneme with two central 

tetragon fibers, surrounded for most of its length by glycogen granules. The 

secondary tube and the limen are similar to those of earthworms (Bondi et 

al. 1993; Ferraguti et al. 1999). While the general features of Nematogenia 

spermatozoon are undoubtedly of crassiclitellate type, characters such as the 

shortness of the acrosome and the basal chamber were considered to indicate 

a plesiomorphic condition within the group.


Eudrilidae. Only a single species of the Eudrilidae has been examined 

for spematozoal ultrastructure, the circummundane Eudrilus eugeniae 

(Jamieson and Daddow 1992) (Fig. 8.49). Spermatogenesis in this species is 

illustrated for the first time in Fig. 8.43). This is an internally fertilizing 

species and investigation of species which extrude spermatozoa from 

spermathecae into the cocoon in the usual oligochaete mode is desirable. The 

Fig. 8.49. Eudrilus eugeniae (Eudrilidae). Highly diagrammatic representation of the ultrastructure of the 

spermatozoon by TEM. From Jamieson, B. G. M. and Daddow, L. 1992. Journal of Submicroscopic 

Cytology and Pathology 24(3): 323-333, Fig. 2.


Eudrilus spermatozoon shows the following unique or unusual features 

relative to other oligochaetes: 1) The acrosome tube bears externally a spiral 

ridge or flange (also seen in some other oligochaetes, e.g. Coralliodrilus, 

Ferraguti and Erséus, 1999). The tube and its extension also bear helical 

ridges in leeches and some branchiobdellidans; it has a spiral tendency in 

lumbriculid and phreodrilid sperm (Jamieson 1981c; Ferraguti and Gelder 

1991). The undulating nucleus and helical midpiece are unusual among 

earthworms. 2) The acrosome tube is greatly elongated, at 7.7 µm, though 

shorter than the maximum in other oligochaetes of 12.7 µm, reported for 

Allolobophora chlorotica by Jamieson et al. (1983). The tube is shorter in most 

leeches but in the rhynchobdellid leech Theromyzon tessulatum reaches the 

remarkable length of 55 µm, and 66 µm in the branchiobdellid Cambarincola 

pamelae (Gelder and Ferraguti 2001). 3) the acrosome tube is thickened 

around the subacrosomal space by oblique ribs. 4) Presence of an 

endonuclear canal containing the axial rod (an endonuclear canal is present 

in the tubificid Rhizodrilus russus, see Ferraguti et al. 1994, but does not 

contain a rod). 5) Presence of a subplasmalemmal sheath of dense material 

in the basal portion of the tail, reminiscent of that of the fish leech 

Acanthobdella peledina. 6) Presence of a wide band of cytoplasm beneath the 

plasma membrane of the anterior region of the axoneme. 7) Replacement of 

the two glycogen granules usually associated with each axonemal doublet in 

clitellates with radial rows of glycogen granules which occupy a wide band 

of cytoplasm peripheral to the axonemal doublets. The large amount of 

glycogen in a broad cytoplasmic zone resembles the condition in tubificine 

parasperm though it is there γ-glycogen (see 8.4.3). 

As noted by Jamieson and Daddow (1992), it is not possible 

categorically to state which unique features of the sperm of Eudrilus are 

adaptations to the requirements of internal fertilization. Examination of 

sperm of externally (cocoon) fertilizing eudrilids is needed. However, all are 

apomorphies not seen in other oligochaete eusperm and coexist with highly 

apomorphic modifications of the reproductive system for internal 

fertilization in Eudrilus. The reproductive system rivals that of the similarly 

internally fertilizing leeches in its complexity. The apomorphies may 

therefore reasonably be considered to be adaptations for aspects of internal 

fertilization, presumably including specific requirements of altered sperm 

metabolism (increased glycogen storage), migration and storage of of sperm 

within the female system and peculiarities of sperm-egg interaction. The 

significance of elongation of the acrosome together with the extraordinary 

elongation of the axial rod, which varies between approximately 14 and 20 µm 

in length, are uncertain beyond its presumed relationship to internal 

fertilization. The length of the acrosome tube was shown in other 

oligochaetes to be highly correlated with that of the microvilli which 

constitute the zona pellucida of the egg (Jamieson et al. 1983). The egg of 

Eudrilus has yet to be studied. 

Microchaetidae. Spermatogenesis in Microchaetus pentheri follows the 

familiar pattern known for other oligochaetes (Hodgson and Jamieson 1992).


As usual, spermatogenic stages develop around an anucleate cytophore from 

which they separate as mature spermatozoa. During spermiogenesis the 

nucleus elongates and becomes surmounted by a complex, elongate 

acrosome: the flagellar axoneme develops from the distal centriole. The 

centriole is positioned posterior to the midpiece. Microchaetus shows many 

plesiomorphic features in the structure of its acrosome, which are also seen 

in two other taxa of the Diplotesticulata, Haplotaxis (Haplotaxidae) and 

Sparganophilus (Spartganophilidae). 

The spermatozoon has a long (3.8 µm) acrosome, with a tube only 

partly containing the acrosome vesicle, which projects anteriorly in a 

spheroidal bleb (terminal bulb in Hodgson and Jamieson 1992). The vesicle 

is deeply introflected at its basis, delimiting a large subacrosomal space 

extending up to the bulb. In the subacrosomal space there is a 1 µm long 

rod entirely contained in the tube. The rod is surrounded basally by a nodelike 

sheath probably homologous to the secondary acrosome tube. A large 

basal chamber is delimited distally by the end of the acrosome vesicle and 

proximally by the limen terminating the nuclear end of the tube. A thin 

nuclear pad separates the acrosome from the rectilinear, 24 µm long, nucleus. 

Six parallel, radial mitochondria form the midpiece. A conventional 

megadrile flagellum follows, with tetragon fibers and glycogen granules 

(Hodgson and Jamieson 1992). 

Hormogastridae. The Sardinian species Hormogaster redii has a typical 

megadrile (metagynophoran) spermatozoon (Fig. 8.47D). The acrosome is 

2.7 µm long, with the vesicle completely withdrawn into the tube. An axial 

rod is housed in the basal invagination of the vesicle. A short secondary tube 

surrounds the base of the rod. There is a limen at the base of the tube, and 

a pad with central boss separates the acrosome from the nucleus. The straight 

nucleus is followed by a midpiece with six (or seven) straight mitochondria 

(Ferraguti and Jamieson 1984). 

Lumbricidae. Comprehensive descriptions exist for spermatozoa of 

Lumbricus terrestris (Cameron and Fogal 1963; Anderson and Ellis 1968; 

Anderson et al. 1967, 1968; Anderson and Curgy 1969; Lanzavecchia and 

Lora Lamia Donin 1972; Shay 1972; Bergstrom and Henley 1973; Henley 

1973) and of Allolobophora sp. (Troyer 1980; Troyer and Cameron 1980); see 

also an interpretation of their structure by Jamieson (1978a, 1981c) (Fig. 

8.47E). The acrosome has been described and measured in several lumbricid 

species (Jamieson et al. 1983): Eisenia fetida; Lumbricus castaneus; Allolobophora 

longa; L. rubellus; Allolobophora chlorotica (Fig. 8.41A-E); Dendrobaena octaedra, 

Eiseniella tetraedra and Aporrectodea caliginosa. The observations point to a 

uniform sperm model for the family, with variations affecting the length of 

different portions. The acrosome has a length variable from 2.33 µm in L. 

rubellus to 12.7 µm in A. chlorotica (Jamieson et al. 1983), with the tube 

completely enclosing the vesicle, a 1 µm long rod in the basal invagination 

of the acrosome vesicle, and a short secondary tube around the base of the 

rod. The acrosome tube ends basally with a limen. There is a thin nuclear 

pad between the acrosome and the straight nucleus. The nucleus is 14.3 µm


long in Allolobophora sp. (Troyer 1980), and 9 µm in Lumbricus terrestris 

(Henley 1973). Six straight, 2 µm long, radial mitochondria follow, then a 

flagellum with tetragon fibers and glycogen granules. The tail plasma 

membrane shows two modifications: a flagellar necklace, i.e. a triple row of 

parallel particles at the base of the flagellum, and “long rows and aggregates 

of individual particles” longitudinally arranged (Bergstrom and Henley 

1973) reminscent of the zipper lines of tubificids already mentioned. 

Megascolecidae. The ultrastructure of the spermatozoa of six species of 

megascolecid was described by Jamieson (1978a); data discussed also in 

Jamieson (1981c) and reviewed by Ferraguti (1999): Fletcherodrilus unicus (Fig. 

8.47F), Cryptodrilus sp., Digaster longmani, Spenceriella sp., Amynthas 

(=Pheretima) sp., Amynthas corticis (=diffringens) and that of Amynthas 

rodericensis was illustrated in a discussion of spermathecal function by 

Jamieson (1992) (Fig. 8.47G). There are variations in the size of the different 

organelles in the various species examined, but the general scheme is 

uniform. The acrosome is 1.7 (Amynthas) to 2.6 µm (Digaster) long, thus being 

much shorter than that of lumbricids. The acrosome vesicle is completely 

withdrawn and deeply invaginated at its base. The acrosome rod lies within 

the invagination, only its basal portion being external to it and surrounded 

by a distinctive secondary tube very close to it and obliquely connected to the 

posterior rim of the acrosome vesicle. The node-like form of this secondary 

tube is diagnostic of the investigated Megasolecidae. Posterior to this there 

is a short basal chamber. The acrosome tube terminates with an obvious 

medianly directed shelf-like exension, the limen, surmounting a thin nuclear 

pad and the domed extremity of the nucleus. The nucleus is straight and 

about 10 µm long. A midpiece follows, with six parallel mitochondria, of 

variable length (0.5-1.4 µm). The tail has tetragon fibers and glycogen 

granules. The low level of ATP in oligochaete (Amynthas hawayanus) sperm is 

discussed by Teisaire and Del (1989). 

8.4.3 Double Spermatogenesis in Oligochaetes 

The literature on oligochaete spermatogenesis contains many reports on the 

existence of “atypical” spermatozoa, reviewed by Fain-Maurel (1966) and 

Christensen (1980), uniformly interpreted as degenerating cells, without 

any genetic role in fertilization. 

In was not until 1980 that two functional types of spermatozoa were 

found in Limndodrilus hoffmeisterii, a species belonging to the tubificid 

subfamily Tubificinae (Block and Goodnight 1980) and their function 

interpreted in another member of the same subfamily, Tubifex tubifex, as 

joining to form the spermatozeugmata (defined above) (Braidotti et al. 1980). 

They were the large rods (up to 2 mm long) already described in tubificids 

in the 19th century (Claparède 1861; Lankester 1871). 

The spermatozeugmata. The first modern ultrastructural studies on 

spermatozeugmata were made on Tubifex tubifex, and showed that they 

contain two regions: an inner axial cylinder, and an outer cortex (Fig. 8.50I) 

(Braidotti and Ferraguti 1982; Ferraguti et al. 1988). In the axial cylinder the


fertilizing eusperm, resembling the conventional oligochaete spermatozoa are 

orientated in parallel. In the cortex a large number of paraspermatozoa is 

arranged with the nuclei facing the interior and the tails spirally coiled 

around and tightly connected by cell junctions (Fig. 8.50H). Only the 

extremities of the sperm tails are free (Fig. 8.50I) (Ferraguti et al. 1988). This 

organization proved to be valid, with minor variations, for other tubificine 

species examined (see below, and Ferraguti 1999). 

The structure of Tubifex tubifex spermatozeugmata provides hints as to its 

functions: the spermatozeugmata hold together, by means of the junctional 

complex which connect parasperm tails, a large amount of euspermatozoa 

“ready for use”; the parasperm form the cortex of the spermatozeugmata and 

envelope the eusperm; the free ends of the parasperm tails are able to move, 

forming a metachronal wave; this probably transports fertilizing sperm 

towards the opening of the spermathecae at the moment of fertilization 

(Ferraguti et al. 1988). Other functions for parasperm cannot, however, be 

excluded: the parasperm may filter or process substances passing from the 

spermathecal lumen to the axial cylinder; the parasperm could also be a lowcost 

material to fill up the spermatheca of the partner, thus preventing further 

copulations (the ‘eunuch effect’ proposed for lepidopteran parasperm by 

Silberglied et al. 1984). 

When the study of spermatozeugmata was extended to other tubificine 

species it was found that, while the presence of a cortex produced by 

parasperm and of an axial cylinder produced by eusperm was a common 

feature in all tubificines, the shape of parasperm nuclei and the presence of 

cell junctions varied in the different species. In Tubifex tubifex and in Clitellio 

arenarius, the parasperm nuclei change their shapes in the spermatozeugmata: 

in the first species they degenerate visibly even showing myelin 

figures, whereas in the latter the nuclei are coiled on themselves, leaving only 

the acrosomes outside the skein. In Isochaetides arenarius (Ferraguti et al. 

2002b), in members of Tubificoides (Ferraguti et al. 1989, and unpublished), 

and in Heterochaeta costata (unpublished) the parasperm nuclei in the 

spermatozeugmata maintain their rectilinear shapes. 

Cell junctions of two different types connect parasperm tails of Tubifex 

tubifex in the spermatozeugmata: septate junctions in the main tract, and 

scalariform junctions in a more distal portion (Ferraguti et al. 1988). In the 

second model of spermatozeugma studied, that of Clitellio arenarius (Ferraguti 

and Ruprecht 1992) the junctions were completely absent, whereas in species 

of Tubificoides only a limited number of septate junctions were present 

(Ferraguti et al. 1989, and unpublished). Heterochaeta costata, Psammoryctides 

barbatus (unpublished), and Isochaetides arenarius (Ferraguti et al. 2002b) 

showed a large number of septate junctions. As noted by Ferraguti et al. 

(2002b), it is possible that there is a connection between a freshwater habitat 

of a species and the production of large numbers of septate junctions. 

Species of the sister subfamily to Tubificinae, the fully marine 

Limnodriloidinae, also produce spermatozeugmata (Marotta et al. 2003). In 

the genus Limnodriloides the five species examined have ‘tubificine-type’


Fig. 8.50. A, B. Tubifex tubifex eusperm. A. Apical portion of the head. B. Basal portion of the nucleus, 

mitochondrial midpiece and proximal portion of the flagellum. Note the reduced size of the mitochondria and 

the ‘conventional’ aspect of the flagellar plasma membrane (× 20 000). C. Eusperm acrosome of T. tubifex 

fixed in the presence of tannic acid. The acrosome vesicle (paler) is almost completely withdrawn into the 

acrosome tube (× 55 000). D. Transition area between axial cylinder and cortex of a spermatozeugma of 

Fig. 8.50 contd


spermatozeugmata, formed by eusperm surrounded by parasperm (those last 

are not connected by septate junctions, however), whereas members of 

Smithsonidrilus have spermatozeugmata of two types, each one formed by euor 

para-sperm only. Spermatozeugmata were also found in members of the 

other limnodriloidine genera examined, Doliodrilus and Thalassodrilides. 

Species of both genera produce eusperm only, but their spermatozeugmata 

differ significantly: a parsimony analysis indicates that these 

spermatozeugmata may even have arisen independently (Marotta et al. 2003). 

The same analysis suggests that, despite some morphological differences, the 

spermatozeugmata composed of both eusperm and parasperm may be 

homologous in the Tubificinae and Limnodriloides and that the simpler 

spermatozeugmata observed in Smithsonidrilus may be the result of an 

apomorphic secondary transformation of tubificine-like spermatozeugmata 

(Marotta et al. 2003). 

The paraspermatozoa. The two types of sperm (eusperm and 

parsperm) differ in all their parts (Fig. 8.50). Table 8.3 lists the differences 

discovered to date in Tubifex tubifex. The other models studied in some 

detail in both tubificines and limnodriloidines showed the same type of 

differences, with species-specific features. In general it may be said that in 

paraspermatozoa: 

1. Acrosomes are reduced in size and contents, or even absent (as in all 

Limnodriloidinae) (Fig. 8.50E,C) 

2. Nuclei are much shorter (up to one tenth those of the eusperm in 

tubificines) and slender (Fig. 8.50A-B,G). Chromatin shows 

uncondensed areas in all tubificines 

3. Mitochondria are always fewer in number then in euspermatozoa (only 

T. tubifex has two mitochondria in both sperm types). In the tubificines, 

however, the volume of the parasperm midpiece is about double that of 

eusperm (Fig. 8.50B,G). 

4. Plasma membrane surrounding the flagellum is largely separated from 

the axoneme in all tubificines and most limnodriloidines (Fig. 

8.50D,G,H). 


Isochaetides arenarius. In this area, cross-sections of different regions of both eusperm and parasperm are 

visible (× 20 000). E. Parasperm acrosome of T. tubifex. The acrosome tube appears ‘empty’ and the 

vesicle is completely external to the tube (× 55 000). F. Ciliated funnel of T. tubifex: both parasperm and 

eusperm are visible among the cilia (× 3 000). G. An entire parasperm head of T. tubifex. Note the plasma 

membrane largely separated from the nucleus and from the axoneme, and the large mitochondria (× 20 

000). H. Cross section of the cortex of an I. arenarius spermatozeugma. Prominent septate junctions 

connect parasperm tails (× 45 000). I. Spermatozeugma of T. tubifex broken and seen under scanning 

electron microscope. Part of the axial cylinder with eusperm is visible, as well as part of the cortex formed 

by parasperm. In the main portion of the cortex, parasperm tails are tightly packed, only their extremities 

are free, and form a metachronal wave (× 2 500). Abbreviations: a, acrosome complex; c, cilia; ce, 

ciliated epithelium; f, flagellum; m, mitochondria; n, nucleus. Arrowheads point to some eusperm sections; 

arrows point to some parasperm sections.


Table 8.3 Differences between the characters of euspermatozoa and paraspermatozoa in Tubifex 

tubifex. 

Sperm components 

Acrosome 

Eusperm Parasperm 

Acrosome tube containing the acrosome vesicle thinner: acrosome vesicle external 

Acrosome vesicle with dense contents apparently empty 

Acrosome rod present absent 

Secondary tube present absent 

Membrane particles on 

plasma membrane 

Nucleus 

regular array absent 

Length about 30 µm about 3 µm 

Shape cylinder basally straight and comma-shaped, elliptical in crossapically 

twisted-column-shaped sections 

DNA content 1C approx. one eighth of that of the 

eusperm 

Chromatin 

Shape in 

fully condensed with uncondensed areas 

spermatozeugmata maintained lost 

Cytoplasm 

Mitochondria 

virtually absent small amount present 

Number two, hemispherical two, hemispherical 

Volume 

Tail 

normal double 

Basal body extremely short; no microtubules 

visible 

longer; doublets visible 

Basal cylinder present irregular or absent 

Axoneme with ‘tetragon fibers’ in the central 

apparatus 

with a conventional central apparatus 

Glycogen 18 β-glycogen granules around the large amount of γ-glycogen between 

axoneme axoneme and plasma membrane 

Flagellar plasma 

membrane 

close to the axoneme largely separated from the axoneme 

Particles arrangement interrupted zipper-lines forming septate and scalariform 

on flagellar plasma 

membrane 

junctions in spermatozeugmata 

We do not know the biological meaning of the differences observed 

between the parasperm of the tubificine and limnodriloidine species, but, 

equally, this is not known for eusperm. It may be speculated that the 

reduction or absence of the acrosome and the reduced size of the nuclei and, 

at least as far as Tubifex tubifex is concerned, the reduction of their DNA 

content shown by Ferraguti et al. (1987) is related to their not being built for 

fertilization. 

Genesis of the two sperm types in Tubificinae. In tubificids, as in all 

the oligochaetes studied (see 8.4.1), the cysts consist of a central cytoplasmic 

mass, the cytophore, to which the cells are connected through a narrow collar


(zonula collaris) (Fig. 8.51A). The cysts pass into the seminal vesicles where, 

in the eusperm line they undergo a series of nuclear divisions without 

cytoplasmic divisions (Fig. 8.52A), and finally undergo meiosis. Cysts at 

different developmental stages are mixed in the seminal vesicles thus the 

problem of distinguishing between cysts belonging to the two spermatogenic 

lines arises. At the spermatid stage the task is easy: the cysts of 

paraspermatids are much more numerous than those of euspermatids (see a 

discussion in Braidotti and Ferraguti 1982). Secondly, the parasperm cysts 

consist of several hundreds (1250 ± 900; n=114 in Tubifex tubifex, Ferraguti 

et al. 2002a) of small cells (Fig. 8.52G-H), whereas the eusperm cysts contain 

a smaller number (128 in T. tubifex: Fig. 8.52B-E) of larger spermatids 

(Ferraguti et al. 1983). Furthermore, pycnotic nuclei are always present in the 

central cytophore of the paraspermatid cysts (Fig. 8.51) whereas nuclei are 

absent from the eusperm cytophore (reviewed in Ferraguti 1999). Many 

ultrastructural details of spermatids and spermiogenesis also differ: in 

particular the parasperm nuclei have, from the early spermiogenetic stages, 

an irregular shape; chromatin condensation is also irregular; the 

microtubular manchette is incomplete (pointing to some kind of relationship 

between microtubular manchette, chromatin condensation and nuclear 

morphogenesis, see Ferraguti and Ruprecht 1992). The tail shows, from early 

spermiogenesis, wide separation of the plasma membrane from the 

axonemes. 

The early spermatogenetic stages of both lines are easily recognized by 

counting the nuclei in each cyst (Fig. 8.52A). However, we could not 

distinguish between the two lines by their DNA content, whether by 

measuring single cells per cyst with a traditional method, Feulgen stain and 

densitometry (Ferraguti et al. 1987), or by measuring DNA content of the 

whole cysts under the confocal microscope (Boi et al. 2001). In other words, 

it was not possible to identify, in terms of DNA content, a line of 

spermatogenic cells containing a DNA amount being two or four times that 

of parasperm. Furthermore, DNA content of parasperm cysts (i.e. those 

having more than 128 cells), although extremely variable, is less or equal to 

that of the euspermatid cysts (i.e. those with 128 cells) (Boi et al. 2001; 

different figures were reported in Ferraguti 1999: for a discussion of the 

discrepancy see Boi et al. 2001). This rules out the possibility that parasperm 

are produced through an increased number of cell divisions. How is the 

commitment of the two sperm lines achieved? Two explanations were 

possible: either there is an early commitment of the two developmental 

lines, but this is not in terms of DNA content, or the spermatogenetic pathway 

is common in the two lines until the spermatocytes I stage (32 cell cysts), then 

some peculiar process occurs to produce paraspermatids. 

Laboratory cohort cultures of Tubifex tubifex with a constant check of 

spermatogenesis have revealed that the production of parasperm begins 

before that of eusperm (Boi and Ferraguti 2001). However, since “... 

euspermatid and paraspermatid cysts and their precursors (i.e. meiotic cysts 

and fragmenting cysts) are present in the seminal vesicles at the same time,


Fig. 8.51. A-E. The process of fragmentation during paraspermiogenesis in T. tubifex is here represented 

for a small portion of the cyst. For a description, see text and Boi et al. 2001 from which this figure is 

reproduced (with permission). F. Contrasted spermiogenesis in an oligochaete with only one sperm line, 

Bythonomus lemani (Lumbriculidae). Modified after Ferraguti, M. and Jamieson, B. G. M. 1987. 

Hydrobiologia 155: 123-134, Fig. 1.


Fig. 8.52. Spermiogenesis and paraspermiogenesis in Tubifex tubifex. A-G. Optical micrographs 

(fluorescent microscope) of Feulgen-stained whole mounts of sperm cysts from the seminal vesicles. A. 

Nine premeiotic cysts (16 and 32 cells) (× 390). B. Euspermatid cyst at the beginning of 

spermiohistogenesis: the 128 nuclei are still roundish (× 390). C-E. progressive elongation of nuclei during 

euspermiogenesis. In E a (probably) 64 cells cyst is visible in the lower right corner (× 390). F. A 

(seemingly) 32 cells cyst undergoes the fragmentation process. At the upper left a four cells cyst (× 390). 

G. A paraspermatid cyst during the elongation process (× 280). H. A paraspermatid cyst at the same stage 

as the one in G as seen under phase contrast microscope shows an enormous number of flagella (× 280). 

Arrowheads point to two eusperm; arrow points to a parasperm. 

the two sperm productions overlap. This leads us to exclude a sequential 

commitment due to hormone production during development, as is the case, 

for instance, of Lepidoptera (Friedländer 1997)” (Boi and Ferraguti 2001). 

Independently from the presence of an early commitment, a peculiar 

process of cell division in Tubifex tubifex has been identified for which the 

term ‘fragmentation’ has been coined (Boi et al. 2001). The following account 

will be mainly based on these findings. 

Fragmentation is a nuclear division which does not entail the formation 

of a spindle and a regular migration of equal portions of DNA into the 

daughter cells. The process of fragmentation is extremely complex and only 

partly understood (Fig. 8.51A-E). However, we were able to identify a 

population of cysts resembling the 32 cell cysts (euspermatocytes I), but 

characterized by the collapse of the collars connecting the single cells to the 

central cytophore (Fig. 8.52F) and by a process of de novo mass production 

of centrioles. The collapse of the collars is probably caused by a


depolymerization of the ring-forming actin (Boi et al. 2001) which in turn lets 

the nuclei ‘slide’ into the cytophore (Figs. 8.51B-D, 8.52F). 

This phenomenon is accompanied by an impressive multiplication of the 

centrioles (Ferraguti et al. 2002a) due to the high number of spermatids 

produced by each paraspermatid cysts: each newly-formed centriole will, in 

fact, become the basal body of a parasperm. Curiously enough, 

multiplication of centrioles occurs through the model of de novo formation 

(deuterosomal mode), a model never before observed in an uniflagellated 

spermatozoon, but followed in the production of basal bodies in the 

multiciliated spermatozoa, like that of the termite Mastotermes darwiniensis 

(Baccetti and Dallai 1978) and the paraspermatozoa of certain gastropod 

molluscs (Healy and Jamieson 1981). It is, however, interesting to remember 

that in tubificine spermatozeugmata the cortex of parasperm will, in fact, 

behave as a multiciliated cell (Ferraguti et al. 1988). 

The next stage of paraspermiogenesis is the formation of irregular 

chromatin lumps in each nucleus, which will become the paraspermatid 

nuclei (Fig. 8.51D-E). The last step of paraspermiogenesis is the migration of 

the newly-formed centrioles to the periphery of the cytophore where they will 

grow a flagellum (Figs. 8.51E, 8.52G-H). In the same area one of the ‘lumps’ 

of chromatin, now detached from the nuclei, migrates, accompanied by two 

mitochondria. Finally, actin re-polymerizes, the collars are re-formed, and the 

paraspermatid cyst assumes the typical final aspect with a large cytophore 

at the center, and hundreds of small paraspermatids at the periphery each 

with its own flagellum (Fig. 8.51E). The mechanism of irregular nuclear 

fragmentation produces a considerable variability of DNA content in the 

parasperm and explains the presence of degenerating nuclei in the common 

central cytoplasmic mass of the cytophore. We may suppose that the 

information for the production and working of the ‘functional’ parts of the 

parasperm (flagella, cell junctions, mitochondria) is already present in the 

common cytoplasm before fragmentation. 

It is difficult, in our present state of knowledge, to speculate on a possible 

evolutionary origin of the dichotomous spermatogenesis in the tubificinelimnodriloidine 

assemblage. It seems pertinent to report that alterations of 

cell divisions have been described in the past during spermiogenesis in the 

oligochaete Pheretima heterochaeta (Cognetti de Martiis 1925) and that in 

Tubifex tubifex parthenogenesis occurs through a deep alteration of meiosis, 

the premeiotic doubling model (Christensen 1984; Baldo and Ferraguti 2005) 

as in oogenesis in some earthworms (see 8.5, below). 

Among annelids there is only one other example of dichotomous 

spermiogenesis: that described in 13 Protodrilus species belonging to 22 

different populations of the polychaete Protodrilus by von Nordheim (1987, 

1989). Spermiogenesis has been followed with particular detail in 

Protodrilus oculifer (von Nordheim 1987). There were no evident differences 

between the two developmental lines at the stage of spermatogonia and 

spermatocytes, whereas euspermatids and paraspermatids were clearly 

recognizable.


It is tempting to establish a parallel between the tubificine and 

protodriline dichotomous spermatogenesis. In both cases, parasperm and 

eusperm jointly form sperm bundles which may be interpreted as a transport 

device for the fertilizing eusperm. In both cases, the parasperm of the different 

species resemble each other much more than do eusperm, thus suggesting 

some sort of ‘arrest’ of spermiogenesis. Finally, in both cases there seem to 

be no differences between the two developmental lines at spermatogonia and 

spermatocyte stages, whereas spermatids of the two types are easily 

distinguishable. However, this similarity may be ascribed to homoplasy as a 

close relationship of tubificines and protodrilines cannot readily be 

postulated. 

8.5 MATING AND COITION (BARRIE G. M. JAMIESON) 

Mating refers to the events surrounding insemination and in oligochaetes 

involves coition (copulation). The present account greatly augments the most 

recent review of coition in earthworms, that of Benham (1950). 

Although hermaphrodite, oligochaetes are usually amphimictic, with 

copulation. Uniparental reproduction is, however, known and involves 

either self-fertilization, as in the Enchytraeus buchholzi and E. bulbosus (Dozsa 

1995) or parthenogenesis, widespread in the megascolecid Amynthas (Gates 

1972). Some populations, at least, of the cosmopolitan enchytraeids, E. 

buchholzi, and E. bulbosus have obligate uniparental reproduction. Presence of 

sperm in the spermathecae is attributed to entry from the cocoon as it passes 

over the spermathecal pores. In contrast, E. coronatus and E. irregularis 

reproduce only biparentally (Dozsa 1995). Parthenogenesis, as in 

earthworms results in diploid zygotes, without fertilization, owing to 

premeiotic doubling of the chromosome number in primary oocytes. Elegant 

investigations of this phenomenon were reported for the lumbricids Eiseniella 

tetraedra, Allolobophora rosea, A. caliginosa and Octolasion lacteum by Omodeo 

(1951, 1952, 1955). 

Early limitation of knowledge of oligochaete anatomy to the Lumbricidae 

resulted in acceptance of the mode of copulation in lumbricids as the norm 

for oligochaetes. In lumbricids the male pores (usually on segment 15) are 

apposed in copulation to the clitellum of the partner and the exuded 

spermatozoa move in external seminal grooves to its spermathecae located 

anterior to the cliellum (Fig. 8.53). Seminal grooves are also utilized in some 

ocnerodriles and megascolecids. They are seen in the ocnerodrilid Eukerria 

which has two pairs of prostate pores connected by seminal grooves to the 

pair of male pores, the acanthodrilin arrangement (Figs. 8.9, 8.54A). They are 

also seen in the balantin reduction seen in the acanthodriline megascolecid 

Balanteodrilus (Fig. 8.54C) as in Torresiella Dyne (1997). In the vast majority of 

oligochaetes, however, the male pores are apposed directly to the 

spermathecal pores of the partner and are often located on permanent or 

transient protrusions, forming distinct porophores or ‘penes’, which are 

inserted into the spermathecal pores. This form of copulation is illustrated


Fig. 8.53. Lumbricus terrestris (Lumbricidae). A. External features of worm turned slightly to one side to 

show genital pores, seminal groove and clitellum. B. Two worms in coition. The slime tube encloses the 

clitellum and apposed spermathecal pores. Relabelled after Jepson, M. 1951. Biological Drawings. Part II. 

John Murray, London, p. 31. 

diagrammatically for the megascolecid (Megascolecinae) Spenceriella (Fig. 

8.54, top) and Metaphire (Fig. 8.54D), which have the megascolecin 

arrangement with male and prostate pores united on segment 18, and is also 

exemplified by Microscolex dubius (Acanthodrilinae, Megascolecidae) (Fig. 

8.54C) which has the microscolecin arrangement, with male and prostatic 

pores united on segment 17. Penetration may be aided by insertion of penial 

chaetae into the spermathecal orifices. This mode of insemination, with or 

without penial chaetae, is normal for the Megascolecidae. Coition has been 

described in detail for the megascolecid Eutyphoeus waltoni by Bahl (1927). 

This species is unusual for its family in copulating above ground. The most 

striking feature is the ‘male cup’ on segment 17 in the centre of which is a 

true penis from the tip of which protrudes a penial chaeta. Further forwards, 

on segment 7?, is a pair of spermathecal pores. In coition the two worms 

appose their ventral surfaces, with anterior ends pointing in opposite 

directions. Each male cup fits over the spermathecal papilla of the partner 

and the penis, and penial chaeta, is inserted into the duct of the spermatheca. 

Benham (1950) recognized four external organs or structures employed 

in coition:


(1) Genital markings, including the tubercula pubertatis of lumbricids. 

These have been discussed in 8.2.4 above. 

(2) ‘Coupling chaetae’, here termed genital chaetae and including penial 

and spermathecal chaetae; have been discussed in 8.2.3 above. 

Lumbricus terrestris uses 40 needle-like copulatory chaetae situated 

ventrally on segments 10, 26, and the clitellar segments, 31 to 38, to 

inject a substance into the mating partner from the chaetal glands. 

Compared to the normal (crawling) chaetae, these chaetae are longer 

and grooved. It has been proposed that the chaetal glands may 

produce an allohormone that manipulates the reproductive physiology 

of the mating partner (Koene et al. 2002). Some penial chaetae of 

megascolecids are illustrated in Fig. 8.55. 

(3) Claspers, with which we may include the alae of Glyphidrilus and 

Lutodrilus. Claspers are best developed in the almid genus Alma for 

which their interspecific variation is illustrated in Fig. 8.11A,B. They are 

discussed in 8.2.4. Detail for Alma tazelaari is shown in Fig. 8.56. 

(4) A true penis. Male porophores which act as what may be considered 

true penes are discussed for Spenceriella and Eutyphoeus in this section, 

above. The large penis like structure, accompanied by a seminal 

groove, of Stuhlmannia variabilis is illustrated in Fig. 8.10; it is 

presumed that this is inserted into the spermathecal aperture. 

(5) Seminal grooves (added here) of various types. These include the semnal 

grooves of lumbricids, which run from the male pore, usually on 

segment 15 to the far posterior clitellum (Fig. 8.53) and that of the 

eudrilid Stuhlmannia variabilis, which runs from the male pore to the 

tip of the penis (Fig. 8.10). Other examples are the seminal grooves of 

Eukerria (Ocnerodrilinae) (Fig. 8.9) and of most Acanthodrilinae 

(Megascolecidae). 

Precopulatory behaviour. Mating may be preceded by precopulatory 

behaviour. 

Thus, mating of Lumbricus terrestris involves a pre-copulation behaviour 

sequence during which prospective partners visit each others burrows. Mate 

searching involves trail-following on the soil surface. This is followed by a 

series of, usually reciprocated, burrow visits. A burrow visit typically 

consisted of anterior segments insertion, for a period of 30 to 50 seconds, but 

also deeper burrow-penetrations, which sometimes lasted several minutes. 

Resident worms, when visited, either withdraw below ground completely or 

remain at the surface, with the first few anterior segments in view. Visiting 

worms normally retain their posterior segments in their own burrows. 

Partners often maintain close contact while moving back and forth between 

the burrow openings and the pre-copulation phase appears to be a specific 

courtship behaviour. Uninterrupted, the pre-copulation behaviour sequences 

lasted from 11 to 90 minutes. After a pre-copulation sequence, pairs adopt a 

static ‘s’-shaped copulation position of close ventral contact. Copulations 

lasts from 69 to 200 minutes (median 135 minutes). If other individuals touch 

the copulating pair, matings are shorter (Nuutinen and Butt 1997).

Colour 

Figure 


Fig. 8.54 contd


8.55. Genital chaetae. A-I. Australian Megascolecinae. A-C. Heteroporodrilus mediterreus. D. Notoscolex 

camdenensis. E-F. Cryptodrilus polynephricus polynephricus. G-I. Digaster armifera. From Jamieson, 

B. G. M. 2000. The Native Earthworms of Australia (Megascolecidae Megascolecinae). Science 

Publishers, Inc.: Enfield, New Hamphshire, Fig. 0.12, after various papers of Jamieson. J-N. New 

Caledonian Acanthodrilus (Megascoelcidae, Acanthodrilinae). J, K. A. cavaticus. Spermathecal setae. L. 

A. cavaticus. Penial chaeta. M, N. A. chevalieri. Penial chaeta. Unpublished, from the study of Jamieson, 

B. G. M. and Bennett, J. D. 1979. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Zoologie Ser 1: 353- 

403. 


Fig. 8.54. Top. Coition in Spenceriella (Megascolecidae). After Jamieson, B.G.M. 1994. Chapter 39. 

Annelids, Arthropods and Molluscs. Pp. 855-878. In B. Knox, P. Ladiges and B. Evans (eds), Biology, 

McGraw-Hill Book Company, Sydney, Fig. 39.8. Bottom. The copulatory apparatus of a mating couple 

of Ocnerodrilidae and Megascolecidae. A. The acanthodrilin condition in Eukerria saltensis 

(Ocnerodrilidae) B. The microscolecin reduction in Microscolex (Acanthodrilinae). C. The balantin 

reduction in Balantodrilus (Acanthodrilinae). D. The megascolecin reduction in Metaphire saigonensis 

(Megascolecidae). Note that only in the megascolecin reduction do the vasa deferentia open into the 

prostate ducts, whereas in other cases the male pores are independent of the prostate pores, to which 

they are connected by narrow seminal grooves. A-D slightly modified after Omodeo, P. 2000. Italian 

Journal of Zoology 67: 179-201, Fig. 9.


Fig. 8.56. Alma tazelaari (Almidae). Detail of claspers. After Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971. Glossoscolecidae. 

Pp. 41-72. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. G. M. Jamieson (eds), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World. Oliver 

and Boyd, Edinburgh, Toronto, Fig. 15.8G (lapsus for H). 

In the Spanish endemic earthworm Hormogaster elisae, spermatogenesis 

ceases during summer months but spermatozoa are retained in the seminal 

funnels and spermathecae through the year, allowing copulation at any time, 

whenever conditions allow. H. elisae has two pairs of spermathecae variable 

in both shape and size; sperm storage is mainly in the second pair (Garvin 

et al. 1999). 

Mated individuals of Lumbricus terrestris produced cocoons for up to 

12 months after mating, while unmated individuals produced no cocoons. 

Hatchability of cocoons decreased to 11% in the sixth month after mating and 

zero thereafter. Median total production of viable cocoons is 5 per individual 

(range 0-21). There is no discernible relationship between cocoon production 

and length of copulation, individual longevity, or individual mass at mating. 

Both partners usually contribute to the production of viable cocoons, but 

within mating pairs there was a median difference of 4 cocoons. Median 

survival time after an experimental mating period was 9 and 11 months for 

mated and unmated earthworms, respectively (Butt and Nuutinen 1998). 

8.6 FERTILIZATION, CLEAVAGE AND DEVELOPMENT 

8.6.1 Sperm Entry, Polarity and Meiosis 

For a molecular perspective on development, see Chapter 5. 

In Tubifex, sperm entry is restricted to the vegetal hemisphere, especially 

near the vegetal pole. A fertilization cone is formed (Shimizu 1982, and


literature therein). Two deformation movements then result in extrusion of the 

two successive polar bodies. The second deformation movement results in the 

formation of optically dense, yolk-free cytoplasm at the animal and vegetal 

poles, the so-called pole plasms mentioned below (see review by Jamieson 

1981c; 1988a). 

The meiotic apparatus (MA) of meiosis I is located away from the egg 

surface at the time of oviposition. The position of the animal pole is 

subsequently marked by attachment of one pole of the MA to the Tubifex egg 

cortex as an optically bright spot (Shimizu 1981, 1982). A centriole is found 

in the inner aster of the MA. Later a bulge develops at this site and is 

extruded as the first polar body. The second meiotic apparatus if formed at 

the site of extrusion and is tethered to the surface by the microfilamentous 

cortical layer. Eggs remain at metaphase II (for 90 minutes) and then enter 

anaphase, followed by extrusion of the second polar body. The deformation 

movements which occur during polar body formation are dependent on 

actin-containing microfilaments (Shimizu 1982). 

8.6.2 Evidence for Polarity in the Primary Oocyte 

A central problem in Tubifex development is the relationship between the pole 

plasm localization and cell determination. It is known that the pole plasms 

are segregated first to the D-cell, subsequently to the 2d- and 4d-cell (see 8.6.3, 

Fate maps, below), and finally to germ band cells (Shimizu 1982). During 

meiosis of the Tubifex primary oocyte, biosomatic elements (endoplasmic 

vesicles and mitochondria) and nutritive elements (lipid droplets and yolk 

granules) migrate within the cell by streaming movements (see review by 

Jamieson 1981c). Yolk granules may be concerned with organization as much 

as nutrition (Eckelbarger 1988). As a result of these segregational movements 

the components become arranged before the first cleavage division in a 

specific morphogenetic pattern of which the most conspicuous element is the 

concentration of mitochondria and endoplasmic vesicles at the animal and 

vegetal poles to form the two pole plasms. There is evidence that actin-like 

microfilaments in the cortex are responsible for accumulation of pole plasm 

(see review by Shimizu 1982). 

8.6.3 Embryogenesis 

The embryology of oligochaetes was reviewed and reinterpreted by Anderson 

(1971, 1973) and development in Tubifex was comprehensively studied and 

reviewed by Shimizu (1982). These studies form the basis of the present, 

albeit brief, review. Additional studies on the development of teloblasts in 

Tubifex (Goto et al. 1999a,b; Arai et al. 2000; Kitamura and Shimizu 2000a,b; 

Nakamoto et al. 2000; Shimizu et al. 2001) will also be summarized. 

Fate maps. The fate maps of the blastulae of oligochaetes and 

polychaetes are basically similar (Anderson 1971, 1973) (Fig. 8.57) (see also 

chapter 5). In both groups the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quartets of micromeres give 

ectoderm, with adult epidermis developing from 2d; 4d gives mesoderm; and 

macromeres 3 A, B and D give the midgut. In oligochaetes the process of


cleavage, in terms of cell lineages, which segregate the areas from one 

another and deformation movements, varies greatly according to the degree 

of yolkiness of the eggs which is least in the crassiclitellates (Anderson 1971, 

1973). 

Yolk content and cleavage. In the Enchytraeidae, Tubificidae sensu stricto 

and Lumbriculidae the egg is large, ranging in diameter from approximately 

300 to 500 µm in Enchytraeus albidus and Tubifex to 1 mm in Rhynchelmis 

(references in Anderson 1973; Jamieson 1988a). The albumen which fills the 

cocoon and bathes the embryos appears to be of little significance as a source 

of food for development as this is provided by the internal yolk. The large 

(yolky) egg is deduced to be basic (plesiomorphic) in euclitellates. The size 

Fig. 8.57. Embryology of an oligochaete (Tubifex) embryo. A. 8-cell stage, anterodorsal view. B. 

Presumptive areas, lateral view. After Anderson, D.T. In R.O. Brinkhurst and B. G. M. Jamieson (eds), 

Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Toronto, Figs. 2.1C, 2.2C. 

and degree of yolkiness of the egg are imperfectly known for many 

oligochaete families but there is a reduction of yolk in the naids (now placed, 

as a subfamily, in the Tubificidae) and it is further reduced, presumably 

independently, in crassiclitellate families. In crassiclitellates, and to a lesser 

extent in naids, the eggs are smaller and the ambient albumen in the cocoon 

is exploited, in what is termed albumenotrophy, as a major source of nutrition 

during embryonic development. 

The mesolecithal egg in microdriles gastrulates by epiboly and the lateforming 

archenteron is empty whereas the oligolecithal egg of megadriles 

(crassiclitellates) gastrulates by emboly and forms a large archenteron which 

engulfs the albumen contained in the cocoon (see Anderson 1971; Omodeo 

2000). 

Whether the egg be large or small, total, spiral cleavage, leading to a 

spherical blastula persists, as in polychaetes, but unlike the latter, the 

trochophore and, therefore, such regions as the presumptive prototroch are 

absent and there is no trace of larval organs or of metamorphosis.


Gastrulation is prolonged and is accompanied by formation of numerous 

segments from the posterior growth zone, leading to direct development of 

the adult organization. 

Cleavage in the naidines Stylaria and Chaetogaster shows major modifications 

although they retain eggs of considerable diameter, 350 to 400 µm in 

Stylaria, and 400 to 500 µm in Chaetogaster. The blastula is attained through 

fewer cell divisions than in Tubifex and consequently has a large 3d cell 

instead of a large 4d cell (Anderson 1971, 1973). 

Earthworms (crassiclitellates) have small eggs (in lumbricids 70 µm in 

Dendrobaena subrubicunda and 100 to 120 µm in Eisenia fetida; references in 

Jamieson (1988a) exhibiting a more marked reduction in yolk than that seen 

in naidids. Their cleavage is correspondingly modified relative to that of 

Tubifex. The D quadrant is emphasized to an even greater degree than in 

naids but resemblance of the blastula to that of oligochaetes with yolky eggs 

is retained and the usual 4d cell is present posteroventrally (Anderson 1971, 

1973). 

Cleavage is least modified in the large yolky eggs of tubificids and 

lumbriculids and we will take development in Tubifex as described by 

Shimizu (1982) as an example. 

Developmental stages in Tubifex are illustrated in Fig. 8.58. The Tubifex 

egg is fertilized at metaphase of the first meiosis, that is, as a primary oocyte. 

After extrusion of polar bodies, pole plasms comprising endoplasmic 

reticulum and mitochondria accumulate around the animal and vegetal 

poles. The developmental stages of polar body formation are characterized by 

a dynamic shape change called deformation movement. The first cleavage 

produces the smaller AB- and larger CD-cell. The second cleavage gives rise 

to four cells: A, B, C and D; the D-cell is larger than the other three cells. 

Thereafter, these four cells divide in a spiral cleavage pattern, producing 

micromeres and yolky macromeres. The pole plasms are segregated into 2dand 

4d-cells resulting from divisions of the D-cell. The descendant cell (2d 111 ) 

of 2d-cell and 4d-cell exclusively participate in teloblastogenesis. The stages 

of teloblastogenesis as seen by by SEM are illustrated in Fig. 8.59. Four 

ectoblasts and a mesoblast are located on either side of the embryo, and bud 

off small cells forming germ bands. Gastrulation movement consists of two 

events: 1) ventral shift and ensuing coalescence of germ bands, and 2) 

epibolic expansion of a micromere-derived epithelial sheet over the 

endodermal cells (Shimizu 1982). In naidines gastrulation is wholly 

eliminated; the presumptive midgut, M cells and the ectoteloblast cells attain 

their definitive positions directly as a result of cleavage and proceed directly 

into organogenetic activity. In earthworms, in contrast, gastrulation by 

invagination (emboly) occurs as a secondary development relative to 

gastrulation by overgrowth of the large presumptive midgut by definitive 

ectoderm which occurs in yolky clitellate embryos (Anderson 1971, 1973). 

Organogenesis begins during the gastrula stage. The ectodermal germ bands 

are responsible for the ventral nerve cord and circular muscle layer. The 

mesodermal organs are exclusively derived from the stem cells produced by


Fig. 8.58 contd


the mesoblasts. Gastrulation is followed by elongation of the embryo. It 

finally changes its shape to become vermiform. The embryonic period lasts 

for two weeks at 18°C, and is divided into 19 stages (Shimizu 1982). 

Significance of pole plasm. It appears that the acquisition of both pole 

plasms accounts for the totipotency of the D-cell quadrant and for 

formation of organs, as opposed merely to endoderm and ectodermal 

epithelium produced by isolated A, B and C cells. The pole plasm is devoid 

of yolk granules. Its major components are mitochondria and its different 

metabolism may be responsible for the asynchronous Tubifex cleavage 

which is led by the D-quadrant. Differences in cleavage patterns of D cells 

compared with other cells may be governed by the presence of pole plasm as 

this determines the position of the MA. The somatoblasts of the early embryo 

thus differ from each other in the different proportions of primary 

constituents of the egg cytoplasm (mitochondria and ER) and in the distinct 

patterns of spatial distribution of these (see review by Shimizu 1982). 

Origin of ectoderm and mesoderm (Teloblasts and their fate). The 

following account of the fate of teloblasts in Tubifex is based chiefly on that 

of Shimizu et al. (2001) and the findings of Arai et al. (2000); Goto et al. 

(1999a,b); Kitamura and Shimizu (2000a,b) and Nakamoto et al. (2000) which 

they review. The relevant events of development, as summarized by Shimizu 

et al. (2001) are illustrated in Fig 8.60A-H. 

As in other clitellates, embryonic development in Tubifex is characterized 

by the generation of five bilateral pairs of teloblasts (designated M, N, O, P 

and Q), which serve as embryonic stem cells to produce germ bands on either 

side of the embryo (Goto et al. 1999a; Shimizu et al. 2001 ) (Fig. 8.60C,D). Each 

teloblast divides repeatedly to produce primary blast cells which are 

arranged in a coherent longitudinal column or bandlet (Fig. 8.60D). Four of 

the five bandlets on each side of the embryo join together to form an 

ectodermal germ band, while the remaining bandlet becomes a mesodermal 

germ band underlying that of the ectoderm (Fig. 8.60H). A large part of the 

tissues comprising body segments has been assigned to the progenies of the 

teloblasts. Goto et al. (1999a) followed the fate of the progenies of each 

teloblast using horseradish peroxidase tracers. M teloblasts give rise to nearly 

all of the mesodermal tissues, which included circular and longitudinal 

muscles, coelomic walls, nephridia (in segments VII and VIII) and primordial 


Fig. 8.58. Diagrammatic illustration of developmental stages in Tubifex. Stages 1a-12c, animal pole view; 

stages 13-15, side and ventral view; stages 16-18, side view. N, O, P, and Q denote ectoblasts; NOPQ, 

OPQ, and OP denote precursor cells of ectoblasts. Mesoblasts (M) are located posteriorly behind 

ectoblasts (stage 12). Anteroposterior (Ar-Pr) and dorsoventral (DI-VI) axes are indicated for stages 13-15. 

Double arrowheads (stages 16-18) point to the anterior end of the embryo. E, endodermal cell; GB, 

ectodermal germ band; PB, Polar body; PP, pole plasm; S, chaeta; Sg, segment. After Shimizu, T. 1982. 

Development in the freshwater oligochaete Tubifex. Pp. 283-316. In F. W. Harrison, and R. R. Cowden 

(eds), Developmental Biology of Freshwater Invertebrates. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, Fig. 3.


Fig. 8.59 contd


germ cells (in segments X and XI). Although few in number, M teloblasts also 

contributed cells to the ventral ganglion. Similarly, each of the ectoteloblasts, 

N, O, P and Q, made a topographically characteristic contribution to the 

ectodermal tissues such as the nervous system (i.e. ganglionic cells and 

peripheral neurones) and epidermis, all of which exhibited a segmentally 

repeated distribution pattern (Goto et al. 1999a). 

In tubificids and enchytraeids, products of the proliferation of primordial 

germ cells (PGCs) spread forward through the mass of yolky midgut cells 

during gastrulation; in each genital segment they proliferate to form the testes 

and ovaries projecting into the coelom and covered by somatic peritoneum. 

However, it is reported that in Eisenia the primordial germ cells which, as in 

other earthworms, first become recognizable in the walls of the genital 

segments, cannot be traced to the products of division of the pair of cells cut 

off as the first products of the mesoteloblasts as these products regress late 

in gastrulation (see Anderson 1971, 1973). As stated by Shimizu (1982) it has 

yet to be firmly established that PGCs undergo migration. 

Ectodermal bands and segmentation. Segmentation of the ectoderm in 

Tubifex is a process of separation of 50-µm-wide blocks of cells from the 

initially continuous ectodermal germ band (GB), a cell sheet consisting of 

four bandlets of blast cells derived from ectoteloblasts (N, O, P and Q). The 

initially linear array of blast cells in each ectodermal bandlet gradually 

changes its shape in a lineage-specific manner. These morphogenetic 

changes result in the formation of distinct cell clumps, which are separated 

from the bandlet to serve as segmental elements (SEs). SEs in the N and Q 

lineages each consist of clones of two consecutive primary blast cells. In 

contrast, in the O and P lineages, individual blast cell clones are distributed 

across SE boundaries; each SE is, therefore, a mixture of a part of the 

preceding anterior clone and a part of the next posterior clone (Shimizu et al. 

2001). 

The P and Q teloblasts uniquely give rise to additional ectodermal 

tissues, namely ventral and dorsal chaetal sacs, respectively. Furthermore, O 

teloblasts make a contribution to the nephridiopores in segments VII and 

VIII as well. Ectoteloblasts and mesoteloblasts are the main source of 

ectodermal and mesodermal segmental tissues, respectively, but all of the 

teloblasts produce more types of tissue than has previously been thought. 


Fig. 8.59. A-D. CSFM Micrographs illustrating the sequence of teloblastogenesis. A. Stage 11. B. Stage 

12a. C. Stage 12b. D. Stage 12c. Ectoblasts are designated N, O, P, and Q; NOPQ, and OP denote 

Precursor cells of ectoblasts. M, mesoblast. Mesoblasts in C and D are covered with epithelium and 

indicated by ‘M.’ ed, endoderm; inic, cells derived from micromeres. × 120. E,F. Higher magnification of 

C and D, showing details of initiation of ectodermal gerrn band formation. Bars indicate relations between 

ectoblasts and their offspring. × 210. After Shimizu, T. 1982. Development in the freshwater oligochaete 

Tubifex. Pp. 283-316. In F. W. Harrison, and R. R. Cowden (eds), Developmental Biology of Freshwater 

Invertebrates. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, Fig. 10.


Fig. 8.60. Summary of Tubifex development. A and B. Posterior view with dorsal to the top. C and D. 

Dorsal view with anterior to the top. E-G. Side view with anterior to the left and dorsal to the top. A. A 22cell 

stage embryo. Cells 2d 11 , 4d and 4D all come to lie in the future midline. B. 4d divides bilaterally into 

left and right mesoteloblasts (MI and Mr); 2d 111 derived from 2d 11 divides into a bilateral pair of 

ectoteloblast precursors (NOPQl and NOPQr), and 4D divides into a pair of endodermal precursor cells 

E D . C. An embryo at about 30 h after the bilateral division of 4d. Only teloblasts are depicted. NOPQ on 

each side of the embryo has produced ectoteloblasts N, O, P and Q. D. A two-day-old embryo following 

the bilateral division of 4d. Only teloblasts and associated structures are depicted. At this stage, a short 

ectoderrnal germband (EGB) extending from the ectoteloblasts N, O, P and Q is seen on either side of the 

embryo. A mesodermal germ band (MGB) extending from the M teloblast is located under the ectodermal 

germ band. E-G. Morphogenesis of the ectodermal germ band. Embryos are shown in E 2.5, F 4, and G 

6 days after the 4d cell division. E. The germ band (EGB) is associated, at its anterior end, with an 

anteriorly located cluster of micromeres (called a micromere cap; MC), and it is initially located at the 

dorsal side of the embryo. F. The germ bands (EGB) on both sides of the embryo elongate and gradually 

curve round toward the ventral midline and finally coalesce with each other along the ventral midline. G. 

The coalescence is soon followed by dorsalward expansion of the edge of the germ band, Pr, prostomium. 

H. Longitudinal section showing the relative positions of the endoderm (end) and bandlets extending from 

teloblasts M and O. Anterior is to the left and posterior is to the right. The bandlet (germ band) derived from 

the M teloblast is overlain by the O-bandlet and is underlain by the endoderm. Asterisks indicate the 

presence of a single primary blast cell in each block of the bandlet. The remaining blocks individually 

represent a cell cluster, which is derived from a single primary blast cell. After Shimizu, T. et al. 2001. 

Hydrobiologia 463(123): 123-131, Fig. 1.


Without the underlying mesoderm, separated SEs fail to space themselves at 

regular intervals along the anteroposterior axis (Nakamoto et al. 2000; 

Shimizu et al. 2001). Nakamoto et al. (2000) suggest that ectodermal 

segmentation in Tubifex consists of two stages: first, autonomous 

morphogenesis of each bandlet leading to generation of segmental elements 

and, secondly, the ensuing mesoderm-dependent alignment of separated 

segmental elements (Nakamoto et al. 2000; Shimizu et al. 2001). Some of the 

epidermis of the Tubifex embryo is reported to derive from the temporary yolk 

sac (Anderson 1971, 1973). 

Mesodermal segmentation. Using lineage tracers, in Tubifex Goto et al. 

(1999b) showed that segmental organization arises sequentially in the 

anterior-to-posterior direction along the longitudinal axis of the mesodermal 

germ band, a coherent column of primary blast cells that are produced from 

the mesodermal teloblast. Shortly after its origin, each primary blast cell 

undergoes a spatiotemporally stereotyped sequence of cell divisions to 

generate three classes of cells (in terms of cell size), which together give rise 

to a distinct cell cluster, a mesodermal compartment (Fig. 8.61). Each cluster 

is composed of descendants of a single primary blast cell; there is no 

intermingling of cells between adjacent clusters. Relatively small-sized cells in 

each cluster become localized at its periphery to form coelomic walls including 

an intersegmental septum thus establishing individuality of segments. 

Ablation experiments show that these features of mesodermal 

segmentation are not affected by the absence of the overlying ectodermal germ 

band, that each primary blast cell serves as a founder cell of each mesodermal 

Fig. 8.61. Schematic summary of pattern and sequence of divisions in mesodermal blast cells. Inequality 

and direction of divisions are reflected by position and orientation of mitotic spindles in dividing cells. The 

mesodermal germ band (GB) extending from the mesoteloblast (M) cell is illustrated in the lower part of the 

figure; each block in the GB represents a cell cluster. Arrows indicate the approximate position, along the 

GB, where each division occurs. A—anterior; D—dorsal; P—posterior; V—ventral. After Shimizu, T. et 

al. 2001. Hydrobiologia 463(123): 123-131, Fig. 4, adapted from Goto A. et al. 1999. International Journal 

of Developmental Biology. July 43(4): 317-327, Fig. 4.


segment and that the boundary between segments is determined 

autonomously. In contrast with development of the ectoderm (see below), the 

metameric body plan of Tubifex thus arises from an initially simple 

organization (i.e., a linear series) of a segmental founder cell for each segment 

(Goto et al. 1999b; Shimizu et al. 2001). Using alkaline phosphatase activity 

as a biochemical marker for segments VII and VIII it appears that segmental 

identities in primary M-blast cells are determined according to the 

genealogical position in the M lineage and that the M teloblast possesses a 

developmental program through which the sequence of blast cell identities 

is determined (Shimizu et al. 2001). 

8.6.4 Organogenesis 

Somite formation. On each side of the embryo a somite derives from a single 

mesodermal stem cell produced by the mesoblast (Shimizu 1982). The mode 

of segmentation of the mesoderm, and the overlying ectoderm has been 

outlined above. 

Coelomic walls. The coelomic walls of the somite are differentiated into 

lateral somatopleure (somatic mesoderm), median splanchnopleure 

(splanchnic mesoderm) and the transverse epithelium covering the septa. 

The longitudinal muscle of the body wall differentiates from the somatic 

mesoderm. The splanchnic mesoderm is differentiated into the gut 

musculature and the overlying splanchnic peritoneum which on the midgut 

(and elsewhere) usually forms the cholagogen tissue (Shimizu et al. 2001). 

Prostomium. Shimizu et al. (2001) state, for Tubifex, that the prostomium 

and the cerebral ganglia (brain) originate from cells that are not the progeny 

of teloblasts. The prostomium, at least, derives from a ‘micromere cap’ 

(Fig. 8.60E-G). This contrasts with the view (Anderson 1971, 1973) that the 

prostomium originates from the anterior ends of the ectoblast bands and their 

underlying mesodermal bands and that the cerebral ganglia develop from the 

ventral neuroblast components at the extreme anterior end of each ectoblast 

band. 

Peristomium. The oligochaete peristomium appears to be a single 

segment formed by fusion of the first, bilateral pair of segmental somites, and 

overlying segmental ectoderm, immediately behind the prostomial rudiment. 

The neuroblast components of the segmental ectoderm giving rise within it 

to a single pair of ventral ganglia (Anderson 1971, 1973). 

Stomodeum. In yolky (lecithotrophic) euclitellate embryos, as part of the 

development of the gut, the stomodeum eventually grows back through the 

first segments of the segmenting embryo, develops a lumen and differentiates 

as the lining epithelium of the pharynx. Continuity between the buccal and 

pharyngeal lumen is established. Albumenotrophic embryos, in contrast, 

develop a precociously functional embryonic pharynx lined by cilia. In 

earthworms this is developed during gastrulation while that of naidines 

arises as an independent albumenotrophic invagination. It is later 

transformed into or (earthworms) replaced by the definitive pharynx. In 

Tubifex, the large mass of yolky cells, or in Rhynchelmis a syncytium, filling


the interior of the embryo develops more or less directly into a midgut 

epithelium by developing a central split. In naidines a provisional midgut 

sac becomes connected with the provisional pharynx and presumably acts 

temporarily in feeding on the ambient albumen. The walls of this sac later 

merge and become syncytial before resorption of the central part of the 

syncytium and differentiation of the definitive midgut. In earthworms the 

midgut sac formed as a result of invaginate gastrulation is already connected 

with the provisional pharynx and takes over the albumenotrophic role 

played in cleavage by albumenotrophic cells. The proctodeum forms, like the 

pygidial cells which surround it, from cells of the temporary yolk sac 

ectoderm. The formation of the proctodeum in naidines, in which the 

provisional ectoderm does not contribute to the definitive ectoderm, requires 

elucidation (Anderson 1973). 

Blood vessels. The ventral blood vessel (VBV) develops in Tubifex by 

separation of the apposed walls of the ventral mesentery and the segmental 

commissural vessels by separation of the apposed walls of the intersegmental 

septa; thus the blood vascular system occupies the site of the former 

blastocoel. In Criodrilus and Eisenia, however, the VBV is first apparent 

between the ventral mesentery and the floor of the midgut. In Tubifex the 

dorsal vessel develops precociously, as a paired vessel between the upper 

edges of the somites and the lateral surfaces of the yolky midgut. Later, as the 

edges of the somites come together in the dorsal midline, the two half-vessels 

combine into a single, dorsal longitudinal vessel in the resulting mesentery 

(Anderson 1971, 1973). In contrast, Shimizu (1982) states that all blood 

vessels develop between the endoderm and splanchnopleure of the somites. 

Nephridia. That nephridia are ectodermal derivatives, as is often stated, 

has been controversial. Origin from a single nephridioblast is generally 

accepted (Anderson 1971, 1973). Anderson noted that the septal location of 

the nephridioblast had been taken as evidence that the cell has a mesodermal 

origin but he considered the possibility of an earlier derivation from 

ectoderm. Goto et al. (1999a) demonstrated that embryonic nephridia of 

Tubifex are mesodermal, being descended from M teloblasts. These 

provisional protonephridia develop anteriorly in Tubifex, Rhynchelmis, and 

earthworms but were considered to be absent in naidines (Anderson 1973). 

However, Bunke (2003) has convincingly demonstrated origin of 

metanephridia of the naidine Dero digitata from three nephroblast cells in the 

frontal epithelium of a septum, suggesting its mesodermal origin. One cell 

produces the rudiment of the canal; another the ciliated mantle cell, and the 

third produces a flame of cilia that beats into the canal lumen, the so-called 

flame cell. In Tubifex hattai each nephridium-like structure was traced back, 

by histochemical staining, to a single cell (detected by alkaline phosphatase 

staining) that emerges in the mesodermal territory in the ventrolateral region 

of each of segments 7 and 8 at the late gastrula stage (Kitamura and Shimizu 

2000b). 

Gonoducts. Where development of the gonoducts has been investigated 

in clitellate embryos, they have been identified as coelomoducts. In


oligochaetes each gonoduct arises as a thickening of the coelomic epithelium 

opposite a gonad. The thickening develops as a funnel while the base of the 

thickening grows out as a duct. A small ectodermal invagination establishes 

the opening to the exterior. A detailed study of the development of the 

gonoducts and prostates in Tubificidae by Gustavsson and Erséus (1997, 

1999) has been discussed in 8.2.11.2. 

8.7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The work of BGMJ was made possible by previous grants from the Australian 

Research Council, Australian Biological Resources Study, and University of 

Queensland Research Grants. Provision of facilities by the School of 

Integrative Biology, University of Queensland is also gratefully 

acknowledged. Mrs. Lina Daddow is especially to be thanked for aid in 

ultrastructural studies. Andrew Hugall is thanked for invaluable 

collaboration in molecular analyses and for kindly making his unpublished 

MCMC analyses available. Christer Erséus and Emilia Rota kindly provided 

some literature. Two PhD students of MF, Silvia Boi and Roberto Marotta, 

have done most of the work on the double sperm line respectively of Tubifex, 

and the limnodriloidines; Giulia Mazzoleni, and Samuele Cerea have done 

most of the cutting; Christer Erséus supplied the marine species; Patrick 

Martin contributed the Lake Baikal species; Umberto Fascio has helped with 

the confocal microscope. The research was supported by a grant from MIUR 

(Rome). 

8.8 LITERATURE CITED 

Adiyodi, K. G. 1988. Annelida. Pp. 189-250. In K. G. Adiyodi and R. G. Adiyodi 

(eds), Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates, John Wiley and Sons, New York. 

Anderson, D. T. 1971. Embryology. Pp. 73-103. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. G. M. 

Jamieson (eds), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. 

Anderson, D. T. 1973. Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods. 

Pergamon Press, New York. 

Anderson, W. A. and Curgy, J. J. 1969. RNA synthesis in nuclei and mitochondria 

during spermiogenesis of Lumbricus terrestris. Journal of Submicroscopic 

Cytology 1: 25-34. 

Anderson, W. A. and Ellis, R. A. 1968. Acrosome morphogenesis in Lumbricus 

terrestris. Zeitschrift fur Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 85: 398- 

407. 

Anderson, W. A., Weissman, A. and Ellis, R. A. 1967. Cytodifferentiation during 

spermiogenesis in Lumbricus terrestris. Journal of Cell Biology 32: 11-26. 

Anderson, W. A., Weissman, A. and Ellis, R. A. 1968. Intranuclear crystalline 

inclusions in spermatozoa of Lumbricus terrestris. Protoplasma 66: 21-26. 

Arai, A., Nakamoto, A. and Shimizu, T. 2000. Specification of ectodermal teloblast 

lineages in embryos of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex: Involvement of novel 

cell-cell interactions. Development Cambridge 128(7): 1211-1219. 

Baccetti, B. and Dallai, R. 1978. The spermatozoon in the termite Mastotermes 

darwiniensis. Journal of Cell Biology 76: 569-576.


Baldo, L. and Ferraguti, M. 2005. Mixed reproductive strategies in Tubifex tubifex 

(Oligochaeta, Tubificidae)?. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 303A, 168-177. 

Bahl, K. N. 1927. On the reproductive processes of earthworms: Pt. I. The process 

of copulation and exchange of sperms in Eutyphoeus waltoni Mich. Quarterly 

Journal of Microscopical Science 71: 481-502. 

Beauchamp, K. A., Kathman, R. D., McDowell, T. S., Hedrick, R. P., Braun, E. L. and 

Ligon, J. D. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of tubificid oligochaetes with special 

emphasis on Tubifex tubifex (Tubificidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 

19(2): 216-224. 

Beddard, F. E. 1889. On the structure of three new species of earthworms, with 

remarks on certain points in the morphology of the Oligochaeta. Quarterly 

Journal of Microscopical Science 29: 103-131. 

Beddard, F. E. 1901. On some earthworms from British East Africa; and on 

spermatophores of Polytoreutus and Stuhlmannia. Proceedings of the Zoological 

Society of London 1: 336-365. 

Benham, W. B. 1887. Studies on earthworms. III. Criodrilus lacuum, Hoffmeister. 

Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 27: 561-#. 

Benham, W. B. 1950. A review of certain external structures employed in coition of 

earthworms. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 119(4): 905-916. 

Bergstrom, B. H. and Henley, C. 1973. Flagellar necklaces: freeze-etch observations. 

Journal of Ultrastructure Research 42: 551-553. 

Block, E. M. and Goodnight, C. J. 1980. Spermatogenesis in Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri 

(Annelida, Tubificidae): a morphological study of the development of two sperm 

types. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 99: 368-384. 

Boi, S., and Ferraguti, M. 2001. Temporal pattern of the double sperm line 

production in Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Hydrobiologia 463: 103- 

106. 

Boi, S., Fascio, U. and Ferraguti, M. 2001. Nuclear fragmentation characterises 

paraspermiogenesis in Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Molecular 

Reproduction and Development 59(4): 442-450. 

Bondi, M., Ferraguti, M. and Scari, G. 1993. Sperm ultrastructure in Nematogenia 

panamensis (Annelida, Oligochaeta, Ocnerodrilidae): A phylogenetic approach. 

Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 23(1): 51-57. 

Bouché, M. B. 1972. Lombriciens de France: Écologie et Systématique, Institut National 

de la Recherche Agronomique, Vol. 72. 671 pp. 

Braidotti, P. and Ferraguti, M. 1982. Two sperm types in the spermatozeugmata of 

Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Journal of Morphology 171: 123-136. 

Braidotti, P., Ferraguti, M. and Fleming, T. P. 1980. Cell junctions between 

spermatozoa flagella within the spermatozeugmata of Tubifex tubifex (Annelida: 

Oligochaeta). Journal of Ultrastructure Research 74: 299-309. 

Brinkhurst, R. O. 1964. A taxonomic revision of the Alluroididae (Oligochaeta). 

Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 142: 527-536. 

Brinkhurst, R. O. 1982. Evolution in the Annelida. Canadian Journal of Zoology 

60(5): 1043-1059. 

Brinkhurst, R. O. 1988. A taxonomic analysis of the Haplotaxidae (Annelida, 

Oligochaeta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 66(10): 2243-2252. 

Brinkhurst, R. O. 1989. A phylogenetic analysis of the Lumbriculidae (Annelida, 

Oligochaeta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 67(11): 2731-2739. 

Brinkhurst, R. O. and Gelder, S. R. 1989. Did the lumbriculids provide the ancestors 

of the branchiobdellidans, acanthobdellidans and leeches? Hydrobiologia 180: 

7-15.


Brinkhurst, R. O. and Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971. Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World. Oliver 

and Boyd, Edinburgh. 462 pp. 

Brinkhurst, R. O. and Nemec, F. L. 1986. A comparison of phenetic and phylogenetic 

methods applied to the systematics of the Oligochaeta. Hydrobiologia 155: 

65-74. 

Bunke, D. 1985. Ultrastructure of the spermatozoon and spermiogenesis in the 

interstitial annelid Potamodrilus fluviatilis. Journal of Morphology 185(2): 203-216. 

Bunke, D. 1986. Ultrastructural investigations on the spermatozoon and its genesis 

in Aeolosoma litorale with considerations on the phylogenetic implications for the 

Aeolosomatidae (Annelida). Journal of Ultrastructure and Molecular Structure 

Research 95(1-3): 113-130. 

Bunke, D. 2003. Early development of metanephridia in the caudal budding zone of 

a clitellate annelid, Dero digitata (Naidida): an electron microscopical study. Acta 

Zoologica 84(2): 87-97. 

Butt, K. R. and Nuutinen, V. 1998. Reproduction of the earthworm Lumbricus 

terrestris Linné after the first mating. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76(1): 104- 

109. 

Cameron, M. L. and Fogal, W. H. 1963. The development and structure of the 

acrosome in the sperm of Lumbricus terrestris. Canadian Journal of Zoology 41: 

753-761. 

Chekanovskaya, O. V. 1966. English translation 1981. Aquatic Oligochaeta of the USSR, 

United States Department of the Interior and the National Science Foundation, 

Washington, D. C., Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi. 513. pp. 

Christensen, B. 1980. Annelida. Pp. 1-81. In B. John (ed), Animal Cytogenetics, 

Borntraeger, Berlin, Stuttgart. 

Christensen B. 1984. Asexual propagation and reproductive strategies in aquatic 

Oligochaeta. Hydrobiologia 115: 91-95. 

Christensen, B. and Theisen, B. F. 1998. Phylogenetic status of the family Naididae 

(Oligochaeta, Annelida) as inferred from DNA analyses. Journal of Zoological 

Systematics and Evolutionary Research 36(4): 169-172. 

Claparède, E. 1861. Études anatomiques sur les annelides, turbellariés, opalines et 

grégarines observés dans les Hébrides. Mémoires de la Sociéte de Physique et 

d’Histoire Naturelle de Genève 16: 71-164. 

Coates, K. A. 1986. Redescription of the oligochaete genus Propappus and diagnosis 

of the new family Propappidae (Annelida: Oligochaeta). Proceedings of the 

Biological Society of Washington 99(3): 417-428. 

Cognetti de Martiis, L. 1910. Contibuto all conoscenza della fecondazione negli 

Oligocheti. Atti Academia della Scienze, Torino 45: 493-506. 

Cognetti de Martiis, L. 1925. La prespermatogenesi negli oligocheti (Terricoli) e la 

formazione del citoforo. Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia 

comparata della R. Università di Torino 40: 1-38. 

Cook, D. G. 1968. The genera of the family Lumbriculidae and the genus Dorydrilus 

(Annelida, Oligochaeta). Journal of Zoology (London) 156: 273-289. 

Cook, D. G. 1971a. Family Dorydrilidae. Pp. 647-653. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. G. 

M. Jamieson (eds), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 

Toronto. 

Cook, D. G. 1971b. Family Opistocystidae. Pp. 640-653. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. 

G. M. Jamieson (eds), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and Boyd, 

Edinburgh, Toronto. 

Cuadrado, S. and Martinéz-Ansemil, E. 2001. External structures used during 

attachment and sperm transfer in tubificids (Annelida, Oligochaeta). 

Hydrobiologia 463: 107-113.


de Majo, A. M. A. 2002a. Gametogenesis masculina en Oligochaeta, Megascolecidae. 

I: Espermatogenesis normal de Amynthas hawayanus (Rosa, 1891), Amynthas 

morrisi (Beddard, 1892) y Metaphire californica (Kinberg, 1867) de la provincia de 

Tucuman, Argentina. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 2002 46: 5-21. 

de Majo A. M. A. 2002b. Gametogenesis masculina en Oligochaeta, Megascolecidae. 

II: Espermatogenesis en ejemplares no clitelados de Amynthas hawayanus (Rosa, 

1891), Amynthas morrisi (Beddard, 1892) y Metaphire californica (Kinberg, 1867) de 

la provincia de Tucuman, Argentina. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 2002 46: 67-70. 

Dixon, G. C. 1915. Tubifex. Liverpool Marine Biological Committee Memoirs on 

Typical British Marine Plants and Animals 33: 1-93. 

Dozsa, F. K. 1995. Self-fertilization: An adaptive strategy in widespread 

enchytraeids. European Journal of Soil Biology 31(4): 207-215. 

Dumont, J. N. 1969. Oogenesis in the annelid Enchytraeus albidus with special 

reference to the origin and cytochemistry of yolk. Journal of Morphology 129: 

317-344. 

Dyne, G. R. 1997. Two new genera of Acanthodrilinae (Megascolecidae, 

Oligochaeta) from Cape York Peninsula and the Torres Strait. Memoirs of the 

Queensland Museum 42(1): 139-157. 

Eckelbarger, K. J. 1988. Oogenesis and female gametes. Pp. 281-307. In W. 

Westheide and C. O. Hermans (eds), The Ultrastructure of Polychaeta, Microfauna 

Marina, P. Ax (ed.) 4, Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, New York. 

Erséus, C. 1997. A record of Randiella from New Caledonia, the first known 

occurrence of the marine interstitial family Randiellidae (Annelida; Oligochaeta) 

in the South Pacific Ocean. Journal of Natural History. Dec. 31(12): 1745-1750. 

Erséus, C. 1979. Bermudrilus peniatus n.g., n.sp. (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) and two 

new species of Adelodrilus from the North-west Atlantic. Transactions of the 

American Microscopical Society 98: 418-427. 

Erséus, C. 1981. Taxonomic studies of Phallodrilinae (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) from 

the Great barrier Reef and Comoro Island with descriptions of ten new species 

and one new genus. Zoologica Scripta 10: 15-31. 

Erséus, C. 1990. Cladistic analysis of the subfamilies within the Tubificidae 

(Oligochaeta). Zoologica Scripta 19: 57-63. 

Erséus, C. 1997. A record of Randiella from New Caledonia, the first known 

occurrence of the marine interstitial family Randiellidae (Annelida; Oligochaeta) 

in the South Pacific Ocean. Journal of Natural History. 31(12): 1745-1750. 

Erséus, C. 1999. Parvidrilus strayeri, a new genus and species, an enigmatic 

interstitial clitellate from underground waters in Alabama. Proceedings of the 

Biological Society of Washington 112(2): 327-337. 

Erséus, C. 2003. Phylogeny of oligochaetous Clitellata. Hydrobiologia 535(1): 357- 

372. 

Erséus, C. and Baker, H. R. 1982. New species of the gutless marine genus 

Inanidrilus (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) from the Gulf of Mexico and Barbados. 

Canadian Journal of Zoology 60: 3063-3067. 

Erséus, C. and Ferraguti, M. 1995. The use of spermatozoal ultrastructure in 

phylogenetic studies of Tubificidae (Oligochaeta). Mémoires du Muséum 

National d’Histoire Naturelle 166(0): 189-201. 

Erséus, C. and Gustavsson, L. 2002. A proposal to regard the former family 

Naididae as a subfamily within the Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata). 

Hydrobiologia 485: 253-256. 

Erséus, C. and Källersjö, M. 2003. 18S rDNA phylogeny of basal groups of Clitellata 

(Annelida). Zoologica Scripta: 33(2): 187-196.


Erséus, C., Kallersjo, M., Ekman, M. and Hovmoler, R. 2002. 18S rDNA phylogeny 

of the Tubificidae (Clitellata) and its constituent taxa: dismissal of the Naididae. 

Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution 22(3): 414-422. 

Erséus, C. and Strehlow, D. R. 1986. Four new interstitial species of Oligochaeta 

representing a new family. Zoologica Scripta 15: 53-60. 

Erséus, C., Prestegaard, T. and Kallersjo, M. 2000. Phylogenetic Analysis of 

Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata) Based on 18S rDNA Sequences. Molecular 

Phylogenetics and Evolution 15(3): 381-389. 

Fain-Maurel, M. A. 1966. Acquisitions récentes sur les spermatogenèses atypiques. 

Année Biologique 5: 513-564. 

Fawcett, D. W., Anderson, W. A. and Phillips, D. M. 1971. Morphogenetic factors 

influencing the shape of the sperm head. Developmental Biology 26: 220-251. 

Feldkamp, J. 1924. Untersuchungen über die Geschlechtsmerkmale und die 

Begattung der Regenwürmer. Zoologisches Jahrbücher, Anatomie 46: 609- 

632. 

Fernandez, I. and Benito, J. 1987. Fine structure of the clitellum of Lumbricus friendi 

Cognetti 1904 (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Boletin De La Real Sociedad Espanola De 

Historia Natural Seccion Biologica 83(1-4): 79-92. 

Fernandez, J., Goater, T. M. and Esch, G. W. 1991. Population dynamics of 

Chaetogaster limnaei limnaei (Oligochaeta) as affected by a trematode parasite in 

Helisoma anceps (Gastropoda). American Midland Naturalist 125(2): 195-205. 

Ferraguti, M. 1983. Annelida-Clitellata. Pp. 343-376. In K. G. Adiyodi and R. G. 

Adiyodi (eds), Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates, John Wiley and Sons, New 

York. 

Ferraguti, M. 1984a. Slanted centriole and transient anchoring apparatus during 

spermiogenesis of an oligochaete (Annelida). Biology of the Cell 52(2): 175-180. 

Ferraguti, M. 1984b. The comparative ultrastructure of sperm flagella central sheath 

in Clitellata reveals a new Autapomorphy of the group. Zoologica Scripta 13: 

201-207. 

Ferraguti, M. 1999. Euclitellata. Pp. 125-182. In B. G. M. Jamieson (ed), Reproductive 

Biology of Invertebrates. Series editors K. G. and R. G. Adiyodi, John Wiley, 

Chichester. 

Ferraguti, M., Balsamo, M., and Fregni, E. 1995. The spermatozoa of three species of 

Xenotrichulidae (Gastrotricha: Chaetonotida). The two “dunne Nebengeisseln” 

of spermatozoa in Heteroxenotrichula squamosa are peculiar para-acrosomal 

bodies. Zoomorphology 115(2): 151-160. 

Ferraguti, M., Bernardini, G., Melone, G. and Dallai, E. 1988. Structure and function 

of the metachronal wave in Tubifex tubifex spermatozeugmata (Annelida, 

Oligochaeta). Journal of Ultrastructure and Molecular Structure Research 99(1): 

79-95. 

Ferraguti, M., Bondi, M. and Lanzavecchia, S. 1991. Ultrastructural analysis of sperm 

flagella in two clitellates (Annelida), plasma membrane and periaxonemal area. 

Tissue and Cell 23(4): 537-546. 

Ferraguti, M., Braidotti, P. and Trigari, A. 1983. Two different lines in Tubifex tubifex 

spermiogenesis. Pp. 446-449. In J. André (ed), The Sperm Cell, M. Nijhoff, The 

Hague. 

Ferraguti, M. and Erséus, C. 1999. Sperm types and their use for a phylogenetic 

analysis of aquatic clitellates. Hydrobiologia. May 402(0): 225-237. 

Ferraguti, M., Erséus, C. and Pinder, A. 1996. The spermatozoon of Capilloventer 

australis and the systemic position of the Capilloventridae (Annelida: 

Oligochaeta). Australian Journal of Zoology 44(5): 469-478.


Ferraguti, M., Erséus, C., Kaygorodova, I. and Martin, P. 1999. New sperm types in 

Naididae and Lumbriculidae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) and their possible 

phylogenetic implications. Hydrobiologia . July 1999(406): 213-222. 

Ferraguti, M., Fascio, U. and Boi, S. 2002a. Mass production of basal bodies in 

paraspermiogenesis of Tubificinae (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Biology of the Cell 

94: 109-115. 

Ferraguti, M., Marotta, R. and Martin, P. 2002b. The double sperm line in 

Isochaetides (Annelida, Clitellata, Tubificidae). Tissue and Cell 34: 305-314 

Ferraguti, M., Redi, C. A. and Garagna, S. 1987. DNA amount in the double 

spermatogenetic line of Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Pp. 357-363. In 

H. Mohri (ed). New Horizons in Sperm Cell Research, Japan Scientific Societies 

Press, Tokyo. 

Ferraguti, M. and Gelder, S. R. 1991. The comparative ultrastructure of spermatozoa 

from five branchiobdellidans (Annelida: Clitellata). Canadian Journal of Zoology 

69: 1945-1956. 

Ferraguti, M., Gelder, S. R. and Bernardini, G. 1986. On helices, sperm morphologies 

and phylogeny: the case of branchiobdellids. Pp. 199-204. In M. Cresti and R. 

Dallai (eds), Biology of Reproduction and Cell Motility in Plants and Animals, 

Università di Siena, Siena. 

Ferraguti, M., Grassi, G. and Erséus, C. 1989. Different models of tubificid 

spermatozeugmata. Hydrobiologia 180: 73-82. 

Ferraguti, M. and Jamieson, B. G. M. 1984. Spermiogenesis and spermatozoal 

ultrastructure in Hormogaster (Hormogastridae, Oligochaeta, Annelida). Journal 

of Submicroscopic Cytology 16: 307-316. 

Ferraguti, M. and Jamieson, B. G. M. 1987. Spermiogenesis in Bythonomus lemani 

and the phylogenetic position of the Lumbriculidae (Oligochaeta, Annelida). 

Hydrobiologia 155: 123-134. 

Ferraguti, M. and Lanzavecchia, G. 1971. Morphogenetic effects of microtubules. 

I—Spermiogenesis in Annelida Tubificidae. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology 

3: 121-137. 

Ferraguti, M. and Lanzavecchia, G. 1977. Comparative electron microscopic studies 

of muscle and sperm cells in Branchiobdella pentodonta Whitman and Bythonomus 

lemani Grube (Annelida Clitellata). Zoomorphologie 88: 19-36. 

Ferraguti, M. and Ruprecht, D. 1992. The double sperm line in the tubificid Clitellio 

arenarius (Annelida, Oligochaeta). The Italian Journal of Zoology 59: 349-362. 

Ferraguti, M., Ruprecht, D., Erséus, C. and Giere, O. 1994. An ultrastructural 

overview of tubificid spermatozoa. Hydrobiologia 278(1-3): 165-178. 

Ferraguti, M., Erséus, C., Kaygorodova, I. and Martin, P. 1999. New sperm types in 

Naididae and Lumbriculidae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) and their possible 

phylogenetic implications. Hydrobiologia. July 1999(406): 213-222. 

Garvin, M. H., Trigo, D. and Diaz, C. D. J. 1999. Some data on the reproductive 

biology of Hormogaster elisae Alvarez 1977 (Oligochaeta, Hormogastridae). 

Pedobiologia 43(6): 830-834. 

Gatenby, J. B., and Dalton, A. J. 1959. Spermiogenesis in Lumbricus herculeus. An 

electron microscopic study. Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 6: 

45-52. 

Gates, G. E. 1959. On a taxonomic puzzle and the classification of the earthworms. 

Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Anatomy, Harvard 121(6): 229-261. 

Gates, G. E. 1962. On some Burmese earthworms of the moniligastgrid genus 

Drawida. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard 27: 295- 

374.


Gates, G. E. 1972. Burmese earthworms. Transactions of the American Philosophical 

Society (new series) 62(7): 1-326. 

Gates, G. E. 1974. Contributions on North American earthworms (Annelida) No. 9. 

On a new species of earthworm in a southern portion of the United States. 

Bulletin of the Tall Timbers Research Station 15: 1-13. 

Gates, G. E. 1976. On earthworm ovaries and their importance in megadrile 

systematics. Megadrilogica 2(12): 1-4. 

Gelder, S. R. and Ferraguti, M. 2001. Diversity of spermatozoal morphology in two 

families of Branchiobdellids (Annelida: Clitellata) from North America. Canadian 

Journal of Zoology 79(8): 1380-1393. 

Gluzman, C. 1998. Ultrastructural study of the spermiogenesis in two species of 

Naididae, Paranais litoralis and Nais communis (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Biocell. 

Aug. 22(2): 141-148. 

Gluzman, C. 1999. The spermatozoon of Slavina appendiculata (Annelida, 

Oligochaeta). Biocell. 23(2): 97-102. 

Goto, A., Kitamura, K., Arai, A. and Shimizu, T. 1999. Cell fate analysis of teloblasts 

in the Tubifex embryo by intracellular injection of HRP. Development Growth 

and Differentiation. 41(6): 703-713. 

Goto, A., Kitamura, K. and Shimizu, T. 1999. Cell lineage analysis of pattern 

formation in the Tubifex embryo. I. Segmentation in the mesoderm. 

International Journal of Developmental Biology 43(4): 317-327. 

Grove, A. J. 1931. The structure of the clitellum of Alma emini Mich. Quartely Journal 

of Microscopical Science 74: 223-233. 

Grove, A. J. and Cowley, L. F. 1927. The relation of the glandular elements of the 

clitellum of the brandling worm (Eisenia foetida, Sav.) to the secretion of the 

cocoon. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 71: 32-45. 

Gruffydd, L. l. 1965. Evidence for the existence of a new subspecies of Chaetogaster 

limnaei (Oligochaeta), in Britain. Journal of Zoology 146: 175-196. 

Gupta, S., Saxena, P. N. and Sundararaman, V. 1999. An ultrastructural study of the 

prostate gland of megascolicid earthworm Lampito mauritii (Kinberg). Tissue and 

Cell 31(4): 397-402. 

Gustavsson, L. M. and Erséus, C. 1997. Morphogenesis of the genital ducts and 

spermathecae in Clitellio arenarius, Heterochaeta costata, Tubificoides benedii 

(Tubificidae) and Stylaria lacustris (Naididae) (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Acta 

Zoologica (Stockholm) 78(1): 9-31. 

Gustavsson, L. M. and Erséus, C. 1999. Morphology and phylogenetic implications 

of oesophageal modifications in the Limnodriloidinae (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae). 

Journal of Zoology London 248(4): 467-482. 

Healy, J. M. and Jamieson, B. G. M. 1981. An ultrastructural examination of 

developing and mature paraspermatozoa in Pyrazus ebeninus (Mollusca, 

Gastropoda, Potamididae). Zoomorphology (Berlin) 98: 101-119. 

Henley, C. 1973. Ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of the earthworm as revealed 

by negative staining. Journal of Morphology 140: 197-214. 

Hessling, R. and Purschke, G. 2000. Immunohistochemical (cLSM) and 

ultrastructural analysis of the central nervous system and sense organs in 

Aeolosoma hemprichi (Annelida, Aeolosomatidae). Zoomorphology Berlin 120(2): 

65-78. 

Hirao, Y. 1973. Spermatogenesis in a freshwater oligochaete, Branchiura sowerbyi 

Beddard. Memoirs of the Wakayama Prefecture University of Medicine 3: 55-62. 

Hodgson, A. N. and Jamieson, B. G. M. 1992. Spermatogenesis in the earthworm 

Microchaetus pentheri (Oligochaeta, Microchaetidae). Zoomorphology (Berlin) 

112(1): 57-66.


Jaana, H. 1982. The ultrastructure of the epithelial lining of the male genital tract 

and its role in spermatozeugma formation in Tubifex hattai Nomura (Annelida, 

Oligochaeta). Zoologisches Anzeiger 209: 159-176. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1957. Some species of Pygmaeodrilus (Oligochaeta) from East 

Africa. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 12(10): 449-470. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1958. Taxonomic Studies on the Ocnerodrilinae and of the Pareudriline 

Genus Stuhlmannia. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Bristol, UK, 691 pp. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1965. Two Ocnerodrilinae (Megascolecidae, Oligochaeta) from 

East Africa: Nematogenia lacuum (Beddard 1893) and Pygmaeodrilus montiskenyae 

sp. n. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 8: 95-107. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1967. A taxonomic review of the African megadrile genus 

Stuhlmannia (Eudrilidae, Oligochaeta). Journal of Zoology (London) 152: 79-126. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1968a. Macquaridrilus: a new genus of Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) 

from Macquarie Island. University of Queensland papers. Department of 

Zoology 3: 55-69. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1968b. A taxonometric investigation of the Alluroididae 

(Oligochaeta). Journal of Zoology (Lond.) 155: 55-86. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1969. A new Egyptian species of Chuniodrilus (Eudrilidae, 

Oligochaeta) with observations on internal fertilization and parallelism with the 

genus Stuhlmannia. Journal of Natural History 3: 41-51. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1970. A taxonomic revision of the oligochaete genus Eukerria 

Michaelsen 1935 (Ocnerodrilinae, Megascolecidae). Bulletin of the British 

Museum (Natural History) Zoology 20: 131-172. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971a. Alluroididae. Pp. 708-722. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. G. M. 

Jamieson (eds), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 

Toronto. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971b. Anatomy: Glossoscolecidae. Pp. 41-72. In R. O. Brinkhurst 

and B. G. M. Jamieson (eds), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and Boyd, 


Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971c. Glossoscolecidae. Pp. 147-199. In R. O. Brinkhurst and B. 

G. M. Jamieson (eds), The Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver and Boyd, 


Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971d. A review of the megascolecoid earthworm genera 

(Oligochaeta) of Australia. Part I—Reclassification and checklist of the 

megascolecoid genera of the world. Proceedings of the Royal Society of 

Queensland 82: 75-86. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971e. A review of the megascolecoid earthworm genera 

(Oligochaeta) of Australia. Part II—The subfamilies Ocnerodrilinae and 

Acanthodrilinae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 82(8): 95-108. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1971f. A review of the megascolecoid earthworm genera 

(Oligochaeta) of Australia. Part III—The subfamily Megascolecinae. Memoirs of 

the Queensland Museum 16(1): 69-102. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1974. The zoogeography and evolution of Tasmanian 

Oligochaeta. Pp. 195-228. In W. Williams (ed), Biogeography and Ecology in 

Tasmania, Dr. W. Junk, The Hague. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1977a. Marine meiobenthic Oligochaeta from Heron and Wistari 

Reefs (Great Barrier Reef) of the genera Clitellio, Limnodriloides and Phallodrilus 

(Tubificidae) and Grania (Enchytraeidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean 

Society 61: 329-349. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1977b. On the phylogeny of the Moniligastridae with description 

of a new species of Moniligaster (Oligochaeta, Annelida). Evolutionary Theory 2: 

95-114.


Jamieson, B. G. M. 1978a. Rhyacodrilus arthingtonae. A new species of freshwater 

Oligochaeta (Tubificidae) from North Stradbroke Island, Queensland. 

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 89: 39-43. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1978b. Phylogenetic and phenetic systematics of the opisthoporous 

Oligochaeta (Annelida: Clitellata). Evolutionary Theory 3: 195-233. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1978c. A comparison of spermiogenesis and spermatozoal 

ultrastructure in megascolecid and lumbricid earthworms (Oligochaeta : 

Annelida). Australian Journal of Zoology 26: 225-240. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1980. Preliminary discussion of an Hennigian analysis of the 

phylogeny and systematics of opisthoporous oligochaetes. Revue d’Ecologie et 

Biologie du Sol 17: 261-275. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1981a. Historical biogeography of Australian Oligochaeta. Pp. 

887-921. In A. Keast (ed), Ecological Biogeography of Australia, Dr. W. Junk, The 

Hague, Boston, London. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1981b. Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Phreodrilus 

(Phreodrilidae, Oligochaeta, Annelida). Journal of Zoology (Lond.) 194: 393- 

408. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1981c. The Ultrastructure of the Oligochaeta, Oliver and Boyd, 


Jamieson, B. G. M. 1982. The ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of Haplotaxis 

ornamentus (Annelida, Oligochaeta, Haplotaxidae) and its phylogenetic 

significance. Zoomorphology (Berl.) 100: 177-188. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1983a. Spermatozoal ultrastructure: evolution and congruence 

with a holomorphological phylogeny of the Oligochaeta (Annelida). Zoologica 

Scripta 12: 107-114. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1983b. Spermiogenesis in the oligochaetoid polychaete Questa 

(Annelida, Questidae). Zoologica Scripta 12: 179-186. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1983c. The ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of the 

oligochaetoid polychaete Questa sp. (Questidae, Annelida) and its phylogenetic 

significance. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 84: 238-251. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1984. A phenetic and cladistic study of spermatozoal 

ultrastructure in the Oligochaeta (Annelida). Hydrobiologia 115: 3-13. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1986. Onychophoran-euclitellate relationships: evidence from 

spermatozoal ultrastructure. Zoologica Scripta 15: 141-155. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1987. The Ultrastructure and Phylogeny of Insect Spermatozoa, 

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 320 pp. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1988a. Oligochaete ultrastructure: some comparisons with the 

Polychaeta. Pp. 397-428. In W. Westheide and C. O. Hermans (eds), The 

Ultrastructure of Polychaeta, Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1988b. On the phylogeny and higher classification of the 

Oligochaeta. Cladistics 4(4): 367-402. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1991. Fish Evolution and Systematics: Evidence from Spermatozoa, 

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 1992. Oligochaeta. Pp. 217-322. In F. W. Harrison and S. L. 

Gardiner (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Wiley-Liss, New York. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. 2000. The Native Earthworms of Australia (Megascolecidae 

Megascolecinae). Science Publishers, Inc., Enfield, New Hamphshire. (CD ROM). 

Jamieson, B. G. M. and Bennett, J. D. 1979. New species of Acanthodrilinae and a 

new genus of Perionychini (Oligochaeta, Megascolecidae) from New Caledonia, 

their phylogeny and zoogeography. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire 

Naturelle Zoologie Ser 1: 353-403.


Jamieson, B. G. M. and Daddow, L. 1979. An ultrastructural study of microtubules 

and the acrosome in spermiogenesis of Tubificidae (Oligochaeta). Journal of 

Ultrastructure Research 67: 209-224. 

Jamieson, B. G. M. and Daddow, L. 1992. The spermatozoon of Eudrilus eugeniae 

(Oligochaeta: Annelida): The first record of an endonuclear canal in oligochaete 

spermatozoa. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology 24(3): 323-333. 

Jamieson, B. G. M., Daddow, L. and Bennett, J. D. 1978. Ultrastructure of the 

tubificid acrosome (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Zoologica Scripta 7: 115-118. 

Jamieson, B. G. M., Erséus, C. and Ferraguti, M. 1987. Parsimony analysis of the 

phylogeny of some Oligochaeta (Annelida) using spermatozoal ultrastructure. 

Cladistics 3(2): 145-155. 

Jamieson, B. G. M., Fleming, T. P. and Richards, K. S. 1982. An ultrastructural study 

of spermatogenesis and spermatozoal morphology in Sparganophilus tamesis 

(Sparganophilidae, Oligochaeta, Annelida). Journal of Zoology, London 196: 63- 

79. 

Jamieson, B. G. M., Richards, K. S., Fleming, T. P. and Erséus, C. 1983. Comparative 

morphometrics of oligochaete spermatozoa and egg-acrosome correlation. 

Gamete Research 8: 149-169. 

Jamieson, B. G. M., Tillier, S., Tillier, A., Justine, J. -L., Ling, E., James, S., McDonald, 

K. and Hugall, A. F. 2002. Phylogeny of the Megascolecidae and Crassiclitellata 

(Annelida, Oligochaeta): combined versus partitioned analysis using nuclear 

(28S) and mitochondrial (12S, 16S) rDNA. Zoosystema 24(4): 707-734. 

Khalaf-El-Duweini, A. 1951. On the clitellum and cocoons of Alma nilotica Grube. 

Proceedings of the Egyptian Academy of Science 6(1950): 52-62. 

Kitamura, K. and Shimizu, T. 2000a. Analyses of segment-specific expression of 

alkaline phosphatase activity in the mesoderm of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex: 

Implications for specification of segmental identity. Developmental Biology 

219(2): 214-223. 

Kitamura, K. and Shimizu, T. 2000b. Embryonic expression of alkaline phosphatase 

activity in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex. Invertebrate Reproduction and 

Development 37(1): 69-73. 

Koene, J. M., Sundermann, G. and Michiels, N. K. 2002. On the function of body 

piercing during copulation in earthworms. Invertebrate Reproduction and 

Development 41: 35-40. 

Kojima, S. 1998. Paraphyletic status of Polychaeta suggested by phylogenetic 

analysis based on the amino acid sequences of elongation factor-1alpha. 

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. April 9(2): 255-261. 

Lankester, E. R. 1871. On the structure and origin of the spermatophors, or spermropes, 

of two species of Tubifex. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 11: 

180-187. 

Lanzavecchia, G. and Lora Lamia Donin, C. 1972. Morphogenetic effects of 

microtubules. II. Spermiogenesis in Lumbricus terrestris. Journal of 

Submicroscopic Cytology 4: 247-260. 

Lechenault, H. 1968. Etude cytochimique et ultrastructurale de l’ovocyte d’Eisenia 

foetida (Sav.). Zeitschift fur Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 90: 96- 

112. 

Lee, K. E. 1959. The Earthworm Fauna of New Zealand. New Zealand Department of 

Scientific and Industrial Research. Wellington. Bulletin of New Zealand Scientific 

and Industrial Research 130: 1-486. 

Livanow, N. 1931. Die Organisation der Hirudineen und die Beziehungen dieser 

Gruppe zu den Oligochäten. Ergebnisse Fortschritte der Zoologie 7: 378-484.


Lockhart, P. J., Steel, M. A., Hendy, M. D. and Penny, D. 1994. Recovering 

evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. 

Molecular Biology Evolution 11: 605-612. 

Lora Lamia Donin, C. and Lanzavecchia, G. 1974. Morphogenetic effects of 

microtubules. III. Spermiogenesis in Annelida Hirudinea. Journal of 

Submicroscopic Cytology 6: 245-259. 

Lufty, R. 1965. Studies on the skin of oligochaetes. 2. The clitellum of Pheretima 

hawayana (Rosa). Proceedings of the Egyptian Academy of Sciences 19: 83-89. 

Mann, T. R. R. 1984. Spermatophores: Development, Structure, Biochemical Attributes 

and Role in the Transfer of Spermatozoa. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York. 

Marotta, R., Ferraguti, M. and Erséus, C. 2003. A phylogenetic analysis of 

Tubificinae and Limnodriloidinae (Annelida, Clitellata, Tubificidae) using sperm 

and somatic characters. Zoologica Scripta 32(3): 255-278. 

Martin, P., Kaygorodova, I., Sherbakov, D. Y. and Verheyen, E. 2000. Rapidly 

evolving lineages impede the resolution of phylogenetic relationships 

among Clitellata (Annelida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15(3): 

355-368. 

Martin, P., Ferraguti, M. and Kaygorodova, I. 1998. Description of two new species 

of Rhynchelmisi (Oligochaeta, Lumbriculidae) from Lake Baikal (Russia) using 

classical morphology and ultrastructure of spermatozoa. Annales de Limnologie 

34(3): 283-293. 

Martin, P. 2001. On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta. 

Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B. 268(1471): 1089- 

1098. 

Martin, P. and Giani, N. 1995. Two new species of Epirodrilus (Oligochaeta, 

Tubicificidae) from Lake Nyasa and Tanganyika (East Africa) with redescriptions 

of E. slovenicus and E. michaelseni. Zoologica Scripta 24: 13-19. 

Martinez-Ansemil, E., Sambugar, B. and Giani, N. 2002. First record of Parvidrilidae 

(Annelida, Oligochaeta) in Europe with a description of a new species (Parvidrilus 

speleaus sp. nov.) and comments on the family and its phyletic relationships. 

Journal of Zoology, London 256: 495-503. 

Martinucci, G. B. and Felluga, B. 1975. Early development of the cytophorus in 

premeiotic male gonial cells of Eisenia foetida (Sav.). Bolletino di Zoologia 42: 271- 

273. 

Martinucci, G. B. and Felluga, B. 1979. Mitochondria-mediated chromatin 

condensation and nucleus reshaping, during spermiogenesis in Lumbricidae. 

Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology 11: 221-228. 

Martinucci, G. B., Felluga, B. and Carli, S. 1977. Development and degeneration of 

cytophorus during spermiohistogenesis in Eisenia foetida (Sav.). Bolletino di 

Zoologia 44: 383-398. 

McHugh, D. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the Annelida. Canadian Journal of 

Zoology 78(11): 1873-1884. 

McMahan, M. L. 1976. Preliminary notes on a new megadrile species, genus and 

family from the southeastern United States. Megadrilogica 2(11): 6-8. 

McMahan, M. L. 1979. Anatomical notes on Lutodrilus multivesiculatus (Annelida: 

Oligochaeta). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 92(1): 84-97. 

Michaelsen, W. 1913. Die Oligochäten von Neu-Caledonien und den beachbarten 

Inselngruppen. Nova Caledonia 1: 173-280. 

Michaelsen, W. 1918. Die Lumbriciden mit besonderer Berücksichtung der bisher 

also Familie Glossoscolecidae zusammengefassten Unterfamilien. Zoologisches 

Jahrbucher 41 Heft 1-3: 1-398.


Michaelsen, W. 1928. Oligochaeta. Pp. 1-118. In W. Kukenthal and T. Krumbach 

(eds), Handbuch der Zoologie. 2. (Plus appendices dated 1930 1932), Walter de 

Gruyter and Co, Berlin. 

Moon, S. Y., Kim, C. B., Gelder, S. R. and Kim, W. 1996. Phylogenetic positions of the 

aberrant branchiobdellidans and aphanoneurans within the Annelida as derived 

from 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Hydrobiologia 324(3): 229-236. 

Nagase, I. and Nomura, E. 1937. On the Japanese aquatic Oligochaeta Criodrilus 

miyashitai n. sp. Scientific Reports of Tohoku Imperial University 11: 361-402. 

Nakamoto, A., Arai, A. and Shimizu, T. 2000. Cell lineage analysis of pattern 

formation in the Tubifex embryo. II. Segmentation in the ectoderm. International 

Journal of Developmental Biology 44(7): 797-805. 

Nordheim, H. von 1989. Vergleichende Ultrastrukturuntersuchungen der Eu- und 

Paraspermien von 13 Protodrilus-Arten (Polychaeta, Annelida) und ihre taxonomische 

und phylogenetische Bedeutung. Helgoländer Meersuntersuchungen 

43:113-156. 

Nordheim, H. von 1990. Anatomie, Ultrastruktur und Systematik der gattung 

Protodrilus (Annelida, Polychaeta). Ph. D. Thesis, Universität Osnabrück, 

Osnabrück, Germany. 

Nuutinen, V. and Butt, K. R. 1997. The mating behaviour of the earthworm 

Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). Journal of Zoology London 

242(4): 783-798. 

Nylander, J. A. A., Erséus, C. and Kallersjo, M. 1999. A test of monophyly of the 

gutless Phallodrilinae (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) and the use of a 573-bp region of 

the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene in analysis of annelid phylogeny. 

Zoologica Scripta 28(3-4): 305-315. 

Omodeo, P. 1951. Raddoppiamento del corredo cromosomico nelle cellule 

germinali femminili di alcuni lombrichi. Atti Accademia Fisiocritici Siena 19: 1- 

4. 

Omodeo, P. 1952. Cariologia dei Lumbricidae. Caryologia 4: 173-275. 

Omodeo, P. 1955. Cariologia dei Lumbricidae. II contributo. Caryologia 8: 135-178. 

Omodeo, P. 1958. Oligochètes, In: La réserve intégrale du Mont Nimba. Mémoires 

de l’Institut Français d’Afrique Noire 53: 1-109. 

Omodeo, P. 1996. Kathrynella, a new oligochaete genus from Guyana. 

Hydrobiologia 334(1-3): 11-15. 

Omodeo, P. 1998. History of Clitellata. Italian Journal of Zoology 65: 51-73. 

Omodeo, P. 2000. Evolution and biogeography of megadriles (Annelida, Clitellata). 

Italian Journal of Zoology 67: 179-201. 

Omodeo, P. and Coates, K. A. New alluroidids (Annelida, Clitellata) from Guyana. 

Hydrobiologia 463(39): 39-47. 

Pickford, G. E. 1937. A Monograph of the Acanthodriline Earthworms of South Africa, 

Cambridge, UK. 

Pinder, A. M. and Brinkhurst, R. O. 1994. A preliminary guide to the identification 

of the microdrile Oligochaeta of Australian inland waters Cooperative Research 

Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Ellis Street, Thurgoona, Albury, New South 

Wales 2640. 

Plisko, J. D. 1996a. Michalakus, a remarkable new genus of microchaetid earthworm 

from South Africa (Oligochaeta: Microchaetidae). Annals of the Natal Museum 

37: 287-293, 

Plisko, J. D. 1996b. Six new earthworm species of the southern African genus 

Proandricus Plisko 1992 (Oligochaeta: Microchaetidae). Annals of the Natal 

Museum 37: 295-307.


Pop, A. A., Wink, M. and Pop, V. V. 2003. Use of 18S, 16S rDNA and cytochrome c 

oxidase sequences in earthworm taxonomy (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). 

Pedobiologia 47: 428-433. 

Purschke, G., Westheide, W., Rohde, D. and Brinkhurst, R. O. 1993. Morphological 

reinvestigation and phylogenetic relationship of Acanthobdella peledina (Annelida, 

Clitellata). Zoomorphology Berlin 113(2): 91-101. 

Qiu, J. -P. and Bouché, M. B. 1998. Classified list of earthworms (Oligochaeta: 

Lumbricoidea), after the study of three fifth[s] of them. Documents 

Pédozoologiques et Intégrologiques 4(17): 181-200. 

Ramisch, H. and Graff, O. 1985. The cocoon chambers of some earthworms 

(Lumbricidae: Oligochaeta) from the Brunswick area (Lower Saxony) (West 

Germany). Braunschweiger Naturkundliche Schriften 2(2): 299-308. 

Righi, G. 1995. Colombian earthworms. Studies on Tropical Andean Ecosystems 4: 

485-607. 

Righi, G., Ayres, I. and Bittencourt, C. R. 1978. Oligochaeta (Annelida) do 

Insituto nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia. Acta Amazonica 8(3 Supplement 

1): 1-49. 

Righi, G. and Varela, M. E. 1983. Narapa bonettoi, gen. nov. sp. nov. (Oligochaeta, 

Narapidae, fam. nov.) de agua doce da Argentina. Revista De La Asociacion De 

Ciencias Naturales Del Litoral 14(1): 7-15. 

Rota, E. and Brinkhurst, R. O. 2000. Mesenchytraeus antaeus, a new giant enchytraeid 

(Annelida, Clitellata) from the temperate rainforest of British Columbia, Canada, 

with a revised diagnosis of the genus Mesenchytraeus. Journal of Zoology 

London 252(1): 27-40. 

Rota, E. and Omodeo, P. 1992. Phylogeny of Lumbricina: re-examination by an 

authoritative process. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24: 1263-1277. 

Rota, E., Martin, P. and Erséus, C. 2001. Soil-dwelling polychates: enigmatic as ever? 

Some hints on their phylognetic relationships as suggested by a maximum 

parsimony analysis of 18S rDNA gene sequences. Contributions to Zoology 70: 

127-138. 

Rouabah Sadaoui, L. and Marcel, R. 1995a. Analysis of proteinic nutrients in 

clitellum and cocoon’s albumen in Eisenia fetida Sav (Annelida Oligochaeta). 

Evidence for a vitellogenin-like glycolipoprotein. Reproduction Nutrition 

Development 35(5): 491-501. 

Rouabah Sadaoui, L. and Marcel, R. 1995. Glucids and lipids of clitellum and 

cocoon’s albumen in Eisenia fetida Sav (Annelida Oligochaeta). Reproduction 

Nutrition Development 35(5): 537-548. 

Rouse, G. W. and Jamieson, B. G. M. 1987. An ultrastructural study of the 

spermatozoa of the polychaetes Eurythoe complanata (Amphinomidae), and 

Clymenella sp., and Micromaldane sp. (Maldanidae), with definition of sperm 

types in relation to reproductive biology. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology 

19: 573-584. 

Schmelz, R. M. 2003. Taxonomy of Fridericia (Oligochaeta, Enchytraeidae). Revision of 

species with morphological and biochemical methods. Abhandlungen des 

Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg. Vol. 38. O. Kraus (ed.). Goecke and 

Evers, Keltern-Weiler, Germany. 415+73 plates. 

Shay, J. W. 1972. Ultrastructural observations on the acrosome of Lumbricus 

terrestris. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 41: 572-578. 

Shimizu, T. 1976. The fine structure of the Tubifex egg before and after 

fertilization. Journal of the Faculty of Science of Hokkaido University Series IV 

20: 253-262.


Shimizu, T. 1981. Cortical differentiation of the animal pole during maturation 

division in fertilized eggs of Tubifex (Annelida, Oligochaeta): I. Meiotic apparatus 

formation. Developmental Biology 85: 65-76. 

Shimizu, T. 1982. Development in the freshwater oligochaete Tubifex. Pp. 283-316. 

In F. W. Harrison and R. R. Cowden (eds), Developmental Biology of Freshwater 

Invertebrates. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. 

Shimizu, T., Kitamura, K., Arai, A. and Nakamoto, A. 2001. Pattern formation in 

embryos of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex: Cellular basis for segmentation and 

specification of segmental identity. Hydrobiologia 463(123): 123-131. 

Siddall, M. E. 1998. Success of parsimony in the four-taxon case: Long-branch 

repulsion by likelihood in the Farris Zone. Cladistics, 14: 209-220. 

Siddall, M. E. and Burreson, E. M. 1998. Phylogeny of leeches (Hirudinea) based on 

mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I. Molecular Phylogenetics and 

Evolution. Feb. 9(1): 156-162. 

Siddall, M. E., Apakupakul, K., Burreson, E. M., Coates, K. A., Erséus, C., Gelder, S. 

R., Kallersjo, M. and Trapido, R. H. 2001. Validating Livanow: Molecular data 

agree that leeches, branchiobdellidans, and Acanthobdella peledina form a 

monophyletic group of oligochaetes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 

21(3): 346-351. 

Siekierska, E. 2003. The structure of the ovary and oogenesis in the earthworm, 

Dendrobaena veneta (Annelida, Clitellata).Tissue and Cell. 35(4): 252-259. 

Silberglied, R. E., Shepherd, J. G. and Dickinson, J. L. 1984. Eunuchs: the role of 

apyrene sperm in Lepidoptera. American Naturalist 123: 255-265. 

Sims, R. W. 1966. The classification of the megascolecid earthworms: an 

investigation of oligochaete systematics by computer techniques. Proceedings 

of the Linnean Society of London 177: 125-141. 

Sims, R. W. 1967. Earthworms (Acanthodrilidae and Eudrilidae) from Gambia. 

Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History 16: 1-43. 

Sims, R. W. 1980. A classification and the distribution of earthworms, suborder 

Lumbricina (Haplotaxida: Oligochaeta). Bulletin of the British Museum of 

Natural History (Zoology) 39(2): 103-124. 

Sims, R. W. 1982. Lumbricina. Pp. 55-61. In S. P. Parker (ed), Synopsis and 

Classification of Living Organisms. McGraw-Hill, New York. 

Stacey, D. F. and Coates, K. A. 1996. Oligochaetes (Naididae, Tubificidae, 

Opistocystidae, Enchytraeidae, Sparganophilidae and Alluroididae) of Guyana. 

Hydrobiologia 334(1-3): 17-29. 

Stephenson, J. 1922. Contributions to the morphology classification, and 

zoogeography of Indian Oligochaeta. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of 

London 1922: 109-148. 

Stephenson, J. 1930. The Oligochaeta. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 

Struck, T., Hessling, R. and Purschke, G. 2002. The systematic position of two 

enigmatic oligochaete-like taxa of the Polychaeta based on molecular data: 

Aeolosomatidae and Parergodrilidae. Journal of Zoological Systematics and 

Evolutionary Research 40(3): 155-163. 

Takashima, Y. and Mawatari Shunsuke, F. 1998. Mitinokuidrilus excavatus n. g., n. 

sp., a marine tubificid (Oligochaeta) with a unique mode of reproduction. 

Zoological Science Tokyo 15(4): 593-597. 

Teisaire, E. S. and Del, C. Q. M. 1989. Determination of the ATP concentration in 

spermatozoa stored in the spermathecae of Amynthas hawayanus (Oligochaeta: 

Megascolecidae). Comunicaciones Biologicas 8(2): 115-120.


Teisaire, E. S. and Roldan, I. A. 1995. Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the 

spermatheca of Amynthas Kinberg and Metaphire Sims and Easton (Oligochaeta: 

Megascolecidae). Comunicaciones Biologicas 13(2): 169-181. 

Tétry, A. 1934. Description d’une espèce française du genre Pelodrilus (Oligochètes). 

Contes Rendues Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie, Paris 199: 322. 

Troyer, D. 1980. Spermiogensis in Lumbricid earthworms revisited. II—Elongation 

and shortening of the spermatid nucleus and the roles of microtubules and 

chromatin in organelle shaping. Biologie Cellulaire 37: 287-292. 

Troyer, D. and Cameron, M. L. 1980. Spermiogensis in Lumbricid earthworms 

revisited. I—Function and fate of centrioles, fusion of organelles and organelle 

movements. Biologie Cellulaire 37: 273-286. 

Valvassori, R., de Eguileor, E. M., Grimaldi, A. and Lanzavecchia, G. 1999. 

Nematomorpha. Pp. 271. In B. G. M. Jamieson (ed), Reproductive Biology of 

Invertebrates. Progress in Male Gamete Ultrastructure and Phylogeny, John Wiley & 

Sons, Chichester. 

Van Praagh, B. D. 1995. Reproductive biology of Megascolides australis McCoy 

(Oligochaeta : Megascolecidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 43: 489-507. 

Walsh, M. P. 1954. Spermatogenesis of Lumbricus terrestris (L.). Transactions of the 

American Microscopical Society 73: 59-65. 

Wasawo, D. and Omodeo, P. 1963. Some arboricolous Oligochaeta from Ivory 

Coast. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona 11: 211-223. 

Webster, P. M. and Richards, K. S. 1977. Spermiogenesis in the enchytraeid 

Lumbricillus rivalis (Oligochaeta: Annelida). Journal of Ultrastructure Research 61: 

62-77. 

Welsch, U., Storch, V. and Richards, K. S. 1984. Annelida: Epidermal cells. Pp. 269- 

296. In J. Bereiter-Hahn, A. G. Matoltsy and K. S. Richards (eds), Biology of the 

Integument, Springer-Verlag, New York. 

Westheide, W. 1988. Genital organs. Pp 263-279. In W. Westheide and C. O. 

Hermans (eds), The Ultrastructure of the Polychaeta, Microfauna Marina (ed. P. Ax), 

4. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, New York. 

Westheide, W. 1999. Ultrastructure and functional significance of intestinojunctional 

spermathecae in enchytraeids (Oligochaeta, Annelida). Hydrobiologia 406: 199- 

211 

Westheide, W., Purschke, G. and Middendorf, K. 1991. Spermatozoal ultrastructure 

of the taxon Enchytraeus (Annelida, Oligochaeta) and its significance for species 

discrimination and identification. Zeitschrift Fuer Zoologische Systematik und 

Evolutionsforschung 29(5-6): 323-342. 

Winnepenninckx, B. M. H., Van, D. P. Y. and Backeljau, T. 1998. Metazoan 

relationships on the basis of 18S rRNA sequences: A few years later. American 

Zoologist. Dec. 38(6): 888-906. 

Yamaguchi, H. 1953. Studies on the aquatic Oligochaeta of Japan VI. A systematic 

report with some remarks on the classification and phylogeny of the 

Oligochaeta. Journal of the Faculty of Science of Hokkaido Imperial University 

Series VI. Zoology 11: 277-342. 

Zicsi, A. 1997. Contribution to the knowledge to the earthworm fauna of East 

Africa (Oligochaeta: Eudrilidae), with description of a new species of Polytoreutus. 

Revue Suisse de Zoologie. 104 (4): 807-820.

Chapter 8 - BGM Jamieson, ultrastructure, reproductive biology ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?