Accepted Manuscript
Multilocus molecular phylogeny of the ornamental wood-eating catfishes (Siluriformes, Loricariidae, Panaqolus and Panaque) reveals undescribed diversity
and parapatric clades
Nathan K. Lujan, Christian A. Cramer, Raphael Covain, Sonia Fisch-Muller,
Hernán López-Fernández
PII:
DOI:
Reference:
S1055-7903(16)30482-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.040
YMPEV 5719
To appear in:
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Received Date:
Revised Date:
Accepted Date:
21 September 2016
29 December 2016
30 December 2016
Please cite this article as: Lujan, N.K., Cramer, C.A., Covain, R., Fisch-Muller, S., López-Fernández, H., Multilocus
molecular phylogeny of the ornamental wood-eating catfishes (Siluriformes, Loricariidae, Panaqolus and
Panaque) reveals undescribed diversity and parapatric clades, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2016), doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.040
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Multilocus molecular phylogeny of the ornamental wood-eating catfishes (Siluriformes,
Loricariidae, Panaqolus and Panaque) reveals undescribed diversity and parapatric clades
Nathan K. Lujana,b,c,*, Christian A. Cramerd, Raphael Covain e, Sonia Fisch-Mullere, Hernán
López-Fernández b,c
a
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, M1C
1A4, Canada
b
Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario,
M5S 2C6, Canada
c
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario,
M5S 3B2, Canada
d
Laboratório de Ictiologia e Pesca, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de
Rondônia, BR 364, Km 9.5, CEP: 76801-059 Porto Velho, Brazil
e
Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Département d’herpétologie et d’ichtyologie, route de Malagnou 1,
case postale 6434, CH-1211 Genève 6, Switzerland
*Corresponding author. Email address: nklujan@gmail.com.
ABSTRACT
Approximately two-dozen species in three genera of the Neotropical suckermouth
armored catfish family Loricariidae are the only described fishes known to specialize on diets
consisting largely of wood. We conducted a molecular phylogenetic analysis of 10 described
species and 14 undescribed species or morphotypes assigned to the wood-eating catfish genus
Panaqolus, and four described species and three undescribed species or morphotypes assigned to
the distantly related wood-eating catfish genus Panaque. Our analyses included individuals and
species from both genera that are broadly distributed throughout tropical South America east of
the Andes Mountains and 13 additional genera hypothesized to have also descended from the
most recent common ancestor of Panaqolus and Panaque. Bayesian and maximum likelihood
analyses of two mitochondrial and three nuclear loci totaling 4293 bp confirmed respective
monophyly of Panaqolus, exclusive of the putative congener ‘Panaqolus’ koko, and Panaque.
Members of Panaqolus sensu stricto were distributed across three strongly monophyletic clades:
a clade of 10 generally darkly colored, lyretail species distributed across western headwaters of
the Amazon Basin, a clade of three irregularly and narrowly banded species from the western
Orinoco Basin, and a clade of 11 generally brown, broadly banded species that are widely
distributed throughout the Amazon Basin. We erect new subgenera for each of these clades and a
new genus for the morphologically, biogeographically and ecologically distinct species
‘Panaqolus’ koko. Our finding that perhaps half of the species-level diversity in the widespread
genus Panaqolus remains undescribed illustrates the extent to which total taxonomic diversity of
small and philopatric, yet apparently widely distributed, Amazonian fishes may remain
underestimated. Ranges for two Panaqolus subgenera and the genus Panaque overlap with the
wood-eating genus Cochliodon in central Andean tributaries of the upper Amazon Basin, which
appear to be a global epicenter of wood-eating catfish diversity.
Keywords: Neotropics; undescribed species; L-numbers; biogeography; western Amazon;
introgression
1
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
1. Introduction
Approximately two-dozen species in the Neotropical suckermouth armored catfish family
Loricariidae are the only described fish species known to specialize on diets consisting largely of
wood, which they scrape from dead submerged logs using specialized spoon-shaped teeth and
force-maximizing jaws (Lujan et al., 2011; Lujan and Armbuster, 2012). Until recently, the most
taxonomically comprehensive phylogenetic hypotheses for the Loricariidae (Armbruster, 2004;
2008) suggested that wood-eating evolved only twice: once in the genus Cochliodon Heckel in
Kner 1854 and once in the genus Panaque Eigenmann & Eigenmann 1889 (both in the subfamily
Hypostominae). However, multiple molecular phylogenetic studies (Hardman, 2005; Cramer et
al., 2011; Lujan et al., 2015a) have found consistent evidence of paraphyly among putative
subclades within the genus Panaque sensu Armbruster (2004). Specifically, these studies have
found that wood-eating species in the genus Panaqolus Isbrücker & Schraml 2001 – then
recognized as a subgenus of Panaque that was also known as the Panaque dentex group
(Schaefer and Stewart, 1993) – were distantly related to wood-eating species retained in the
genus Panaque. Moreover, all three major wood-eating clades – Cochliodon, Panaque, and
Panaqolus – were independently nested within clades consisting predominantly of non-wood
eating species (Lujan et al., 2015a). This has led to the current hypothesis that wood-eating
dietary specializations have evolved at least three times within the Loricariidae.
To further complicate our understanding of wood-eating fish evolution, the most recent
and comprehensive molecular phylogenetic analysis of the subfamily Hypostominae (Lujan et al.,
2015a) found little support for a close relationship between the enigmatic Guiana Shield species
Panaqolus koko and other members of the genus Panaqolus. Since P. koko shares a putatively
wood-eating jaw morphology with other members of Panaqolus, this left open the possibility
that P. koko represented a fourth independent origin of wood-eating. Indeed, differences in the
morphology of P. koko (Fisch-Muller et al., 2012) and its restricted geographic distribution in the
upper Maroni River of French Guiana – which is well outside the range of any other known
member of the genus Panaqolus – support the distinctiveness of this species. However, the exact
placement of P. koko with respect to Panaqolus sensu stricto remains unresolved, and gut
contents of P. koko have not previously been examined.
To date, various studies have examined the species-level taxonomy of Cochliodon (or the
Hypostomus cochliodon group; Armbruster, 2003; Hollanda-Carvalho and Weber, 2004),
Panaqolus (Schaefer and Stewart, 1993; Chockley and Armbruster, 2002), and Panaque (Lujan
et al., 2010), but these studies have thus far been restricted to morphological analyses alone and
only Schaefer and Stewart (1993) and Armbruster (2003) included phylogenetic hypotheses.
Moreover, in the case of Panaqolus, Schaefer and Stewart (1993) examined only five of the 22
putative species or morphotypes examined in this study and one species (Panaqolus dentex) not
examined in this study. We use molecular phylogenetic methods to investigate relationships
within Panaqolus and Panaque, both of which are widespread within the Orinoco and Amazon
basins, with Panaque also occurring west of the Andes in the Magdalena and Maracaibo basins.
Adult Panaque can reach almost one meter in total length (60 cm SL) and are widely distributed
in large river channel habitats (Lujan et al., 2010). In contrast, the genus Panaqolus rarely
exceeds 15 cm SL and is most commonly encountered in medium-sized piedmont rivers of the
Andes and the Brazilian and Guiana shields (Lujan et al., 2011; 2013a; Cramer and Rapp PyDaniel, 2015; Cramer and de Sousa, 2016; Tan et al., 2016). Biogeographical patterns within
2
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
these genera may therefore be highly complementary and informative of the hydrogeographic
history of South America – particularly the vast expansion of piedmont habitats that likely
occurred during Late Miocene tectonic uplifts of the Andes Mountains (Wesselingh and Hoorn,
2011).
Both Panaqolus and Panaque contain boldly patterned species that are highly coveted by
aquarists and are collected and exported in large numbers to supply the global aquarium fish
trade. Species in the genus Panaqolus are popularly known as ‘clown plecos’, and those in
Panaque as ‘royal plecos’. Within these groups, vivid popular names convey some of the striking
color diversity of these groups, including: ‘goldstripe pleco’, ‘tiger pleco’, ‘orange spot pleco’,
‘blue-eyed pleco’, ‘flash pleco’, and ‘watermelon pleco’. The interest of aquarists in distinctive
color morphs has driven an intense search for new diversity in many rivers still unstudied by
ichthyologists, leading to the discovery and exportation of dozens of new, distinctive color
morphs and species unknown to science from throughout tropical South America. Unfortunately,
voucher specimens from many of these populations remain scarce or absent in scientific
collections, largely precluding their comprehensive examination and taxonomic description by
ichthyologists.
In the absence of such descriptions, and in order to market and track distinctive
populations and species-specific life history information without interfering with scientific
taxonomy, aquarists have assigned each geographic color morph a unique alphanumeric code
known as an L-number (i.e., Loricariidae numbers; Stawikowski, 1988; Dignall, 2014). To
maximize the diversity of taxa included in this study, we worked with aquarists to obtain tissues
from as many putatively undescribed species of Panaqolus and Panaque as possible, and have
combined these in our analyses with all but one currently recognized Panaqolus species and all
but two recognized Panaque species. Photos alone serve as vouchers for many of the
undescribed ornamental species in our analyses, although the aquarists with whom we
collaborated have themselves collected many of the morphotypes in our study and can therefore
provide reliable locality data. Of course, this has not precluded us from also including a wide
range of museum-vouchered specimens.
Our goals are to (1) examine phylogenetic relationships among a comprehensive set of
both described and undescribed Panaqolus and Panaque species and color morphs, (2) examine
morphological and biogeographical correlates of the well-supported clades that we find, (3)
describe new subgenera for clades that have both strong statistical support and clearly diagnostic
morphological and biogeographical patterns, and (4) to conduct a more robust reevaluation of the
hypothesis that there has been a fourth independent origin of wood-eating in the enigmatic
Maroni River species ‘Panaqolus’ koko, including both new phylogenetic and gut contents data.
Even if our phylogenetic and taxonomic appraisal must remain incomplete pending the
availability of scientifically vouchered specimens, we believe our results are still a valuable
contribution to ongoing taxonomic and evolutionary studies and to conservation efforts of two
largely unstudied yet diverse, widespread and commercially exploited fish groups.
2. Methods
2.1 Taxon sampling
We sampled most densely within the three tribe-level clades Hypostomini, Peckoltia Clade, and
Hemiancistrus Clade (sensu Lujan et al., 2015a; Table 1), which respectively contain the wood-
3
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
eating genera Cochliodon, Panaqolus, and Panaque, and comprise a single strongly
monophyletic clade nested within the subfamily Hypostominae (Lujan et al., 2015a). We
included in our analyses all but one currently valid species of Panaqolus (Fig. 1; missing
Panaqolus dentex from the Huallaga River basin in Peru), all but two currently valid species of
Panaque (missing Panaque suttonorum from the Lake Maracaibo basin in Venezuela and P.
titan from the Napo River basin in Ecuador), and representatives of every other currently valid
genus hypothesized to have descended from the most recent common ancestor of Panaqolus and
Panaque (n=14).
We also sampled broadly outside of these clades (Table 1), including representatives of
five of six other tribe-level clades within Hypostominae (sensu Lujan et al., 2015a), four of five
other loricariid subfamilies (Delturinae, Neoplecostominae, Loricariinae, and Lithogeninae) and
three of five other families within the suborder Loricarioidei (Astroblepidae, Callichthyidae, and
Trichomycteridae).
2.2 Tissue and DNA sources
Newly generated sequence data (Table 1) were obtained from tissue samples or DNA extracts
collected by the authors or provided by the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University in
Philadelphia, PA, USA (ANSP), the Auburn University Museum Fish Collection in Auburn, AL,
USA (AUM), the Coleções Zoológicas e Laboratórios Integrados, Universidade Federal de
Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil (UFRO-ICT), the Muséum d'histoire naturelle of the City of
Geneva, Switzerland (MHNG), the Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor
de San Marcos in Lima, Peru (MUSM), the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, Canada (ROM),
or obtained through the ornamental fish trade. Voucher specimens (Table 1) were identified by
via either direct examination of specimens or via photograph of the source specimen. Many
species or morphotypes of Panaqolus are only available through the ornamental fish trade and
tissues (fin clips) of these species were obtained non-lethally from living specimens for which
the river drainage of origin was known directly from the collector. Only photo vouchers are
available for these tissues (Fig. 1). Given the allopatric distributions of most Panaqolus and
Panaque species and morphotypes, and the distinctive color and/or tooth patterns of most
sympatric species, we believe that identifications made via combinations of geography, color
pattern, and gross external morphology are robust, even if the color pattern and external
morphology of some specimens were only examined via photographs.
2.3 Molecular markers, DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing
Molecular phylogenetic methods followed those of Lujan et al. (2015a). In brief, we amplified
and sequenced a fragment of the mitochondrial 16S (~600 bp) and cytochrome b (~1150 bp)
genes as well as the nuclear RAG1 (~1020 bp), RAG2 (~950 bp) and MyH6 (~660 bp) genes for
a total of 4293 aligned base pairs. Each fragment was amplified using previously published
primers (Li et al., 2007; Lujan et al., 2015a). Whole genomic DNA was extracted from fin or
muscle tissues preserved in 95% ethanol following manufacturer’s instructions for the DNeasy
Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen N.V., Venlo, Netherlands). Fragment amplifications were
performed following the methods of Lujan et al. (2015a). Post-PCR cleanup of all loci, was
achieved by running the entire volume of PCR product on a 1% agarose gel with 0.01% SYBR®
Safe DNA gel stain (LTI: Life Technologies Inc., Carlsbad, CA). The band corresponding to the
4
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
target locus was cut from the gel and the target PCR product extracted by centrifuge filtration
through the top of a P-200 pipette filter tip in a labeled 1 mL snap-top tube (5 min at 15000 rpm).
Forward and reverse sequencing reactions followed the manufacturer’s recommendations for
sequencing on an Applied Biosystems™ 3730 DNA analyzer (LTI).
2.4 Sequence assembly, alignment, and phylogenetic inference
Sequence data were assembled, edited, aligned, and concatenated following the methods of
Lujan et al. (2015a). PartitionFinder (v1.1.1, Lanfear et al., 2012) was used to determine codonspecific models of molecular evolution for each gene under the Bayesian information criterion
(BIC). A generalized time reversible model with proportion of invariable sites estimated and rate
heterogeneity of the remainder being modeled by a gamma distribution (GTR+I+Gamma) was
determined to be the best model of molecular evolution for 16S (all sites), Cyt b (all sites), the
first two codon positions of RAG1 and RAG2, and the first and third codon positions of MyH6.
A GTR model with rate heterogeneity of all sites being modeled by a gamma distribution
(GTR+Gamma) was determined to be the best model of molecular evolution for the third codon
positions of RAG1 and RAG2 and the second codon position of MyH6. All data partitions were
unlinked with rates free to vary across partitions. Under this partitioning scheme, phylogenetic
analyses of the concatenated alignment of 4293 base pairs were conducted using Bayesian
inference and maximum likelihood methods with Vandellia sp. (Trichomycteridae) designated as
the outgroup.
A Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) search of tree space was conducted
using MrBayes (v3.2.3; Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) on the CIPRES supercomputing
cluster (Miller et al., 2010). MrBayes was programmed to run for 35 million generations using
two sets of four chains (1 cold, 3 hot, with default temperature parameter), sampling every 9000
trees with the first 25% of trees (968) being discarded as burn-in, thus generating a total of 2916
trees from which posterior probabilities were calculated. The Bayesian search was determined to
have reached stationarity when likelihood values of the cold chains began randomly fluctuating
within a stable range and when effective sample sizes for all metrics exceeded 200 as determined
by the program Tracer (v1.6; Rambault et al., 2007). Maximum likelihood analysis was
conducted using RAxML-HPC2 (v8.1.11; Stamatakis, 2014), also on the CIPRES
supercomputing cluster, programmed to first conduct 1500 independent runs with random
starting trees to search for the best tree and then generate bootstrap support values based on a
1000 replication search of tree space. To evaluate the influence of mitochondrial loci on our
results, we also conducted separate maximum likelihood analyses on respective alignments of
mitochondrial vs. nuclear loci using RAxML-HPC2 parameterized as in the full analysis.
2.5 Presentation of phylogenetic results
Complete results of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses, including results of the
separate maximum likelihood analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear loci, are presented as
supplementary files. Manuscript figures were trimmed of all outgroup taxa and were based on
results of the Bayesian analysis; however, node support values from both the Bayesian and full
maximum likelihood analyses are provided in Tables 2 and 3. We also provide Bayesian
posterior probability (i.e., Bayesian inference = BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap
support values for each node discussed in the text.
5
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
2.6 Undescribed and incertae sedis taxa
Given the utility and generally standardized application of so-called ‘L-number’ codes
(Stawikowski, 1988; Dignall, 2014), we have adopted them throughout this manuscript as a
means of referring to species or geographically defined morphotypes that have not yet been
scientifically described. Our study also includes several species that are currently recognized as
members of genera that this and previous molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed to be
paraphyletic. For these species, the genus name in general usage is still provided but this name is
placed in single quotation marks if the species is separated from the clade that includes the type
species for the genus. Tribe-level clade names follow Lujan et al. (2015a) in which undescribed
tribes are named by an included genus plus capitalized ‘Clade’.
2.7 Gut contents analysis of ‘Panaqolus’ koko
The entire gastrointestinal (GI) track of a single specimen of ‘Panaqolus’ koko (paratype:
MHNG 2723.089, 88.3 mm SL) was removed, measured, and examined via 50x dissecting scope
at several points along its length by opening holes in the GI tract, and removing and visually
examining the gut contents. These results are compared with previous observations by Schaefer
and Stewart (1993) and German (2009) that the gut contents of Panaqolus dentex, P. gnomus, P.
nocturnus, and P. purusiensis (i.e., four of the 11 described species in the genus) contain wood
particles.
3. Results
3.1 Deep relationships, Figure 2, Table 2
As previously found by Lujan et al. (2015a), statistical support for monophyly of the clade
containing all wood-eating (and many non-wood eating) genera was strong (Node 57: BI: 1.0,
ML: 100). Statistical support for monophyly of the clade containing the sister tribes Hypostomini
and the Peckoltia Clade was also strong (Node 58: BI: 1.0, ML: 99), as was support for the tribe
Hypostomini, containing the wood-eating genus Cochliodon and the non-wood eating genera
Hypostomus and Pterygoplichthys (SI Figs. 1 and 2: BI: 1.0, ML: 96). As expected, deep
relationships were poorly resolved in our analysis of mitochondrial data alone (SI Fig. 3).
However, the composition of major clades and their node support values were similar in our
analysis of nuclear data alone (SI Fig. 4), with the exception that Pterygoplichthys gibbiceps
formed a well-supported clade (ML: 90) with ‘Hemiancistrus’ landoni in the nuclear analysis.
3.2 Generic relationships within the Peckoltia Clade, Figure 2, Table 2
Support for monophyly of the Peckoltia Clade was much stronger in this study (Node 56: BI:
0.98, ML: 88) than in Lujan et al. (2015a: BI: 0.73, ML: 52), although both studies found the
clade to contain the currently valid genera Ancistomus, Aphanotorulus, Hypancistrus,
Isorineloricaria, Peckoltia, Peckoltichthys, Panaqolus, and Scobinancistrus, as well as the
incertae sedis species ‘Spectracanthicus’ immaculatus and ‘Hemiancistrus’ landoni. All
respectively valid, non-monotypic genera within the Peckoltia Clade were found to be strongly
6
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
monophyletic (BI: >0.99, ML: >75). Hypancistrus contained the monotypic genus and species
Micracanthicus vandragti, which is therefore treated herein as a member thereof. Intergeneric
relationships within the Peckoltia Clade largely paralleled those of Lujan et al. (2015a), with
only two exceptions: First, ‘Spectracanthicus’ immaculatus and Isorineloricaria spinosissimus
were no longer found to be sister to each other but rather successive sister lineages to all other
Peckoltia Clade genera exclusive of Aphanotorulus and ‘Hemiancistrus’ landoni. Second,
‘Panaqolus’ koko was no longer found to form a polytomy with Panaqolus, Peckoltia and
Scobinancistrus + Ancistomus, but was consistently (though weakly) supported as sister to a
clade containing all these other genera (Node 42: BI: 84, ML: 26). Within this later clade,
Ancistomus and Scobinancistrus were found to form a strongly monophyletic clade (Node 26:
BI: 1.00, ML: 76), with this clade being weakly and ambiguously supported as sister to
Panaqolus (Node 27: BI: 0.71, ML: –). With the exception of the already mentioned change in
position of Pterygoplichthys gibbiceps, the topology of relationships from the full analysis was
similar to that found in our nuclear analysis (SI Fig. 4); however, node support values were much
lower when based only on nuclear data. The mitochondrial analysis (SI Fig. 3) also yielded a
monophyletic Panaqolus exclusive of ‘P.’ koko. Interestingly, the mitochondrial analysis found
‘P.’ koko to be sister to a clade containing the majority of Amazon Basin Peckoltia (i.e.,
exclusive of Peckoltia pankimpuju and a clade of upper Orinoco Peckoltia), although support for
these relationships was generally very weak
3.3 Species relationships within Panaqolus, Figure 2, Table 2
The genus Panaqolus was only found to be strongly monophyletic (Node 22: BI: 1.0, ML: 92)
with the exclusion of P. koko. Panaqolus species and morphotypes were clustered into three
strongly monophyletic clades designated herein as subgenera because of their correlated
morphological and biogeographical characteristics (see Discussion). Three small-bodied species
from the Orinoco River (hereafter: ‘Orinoco clown plecos’) were found to be strongly
monophyletic (Node 11: BI: 1.0, ML: 100) and moderately supported as sister (Node 12: BI:
0.87, ML: 71) to a well-supported clade (Node 9: BI: 1.0, ML: 90) of upper Amazon Basin
species that are distinguished by having unbranched principal caudal-fin rays elongated as
filaments (Fig. 1; hereafter: ‘lyretail clown plecos’).
Within the clade of lyretail clown plecos, three (or possibly four) Andean piedmont
species (Panaqolus albomaculatus, P. albivermis San Alejandro, P. cf. albivermis Ucayali, and P.
n.sp. Ucayali L425) were found to be strongly monophyletic (Node 8: BI: 1.0, ML: 91) and sister
to a well-supported clade containing all other species (Node 5: BI: 1.0, ML: 69). Intriguingly, the
clade containing P. albomaculatus, P. albivermis, and P. n.sp. L425 is further distinguished by
having rows of elongate mandibular teeth that are parallel with the longitudinal body axis – a
condition that is unique within the Loricariidae. Within this clade, P. albomaculatus from the
Marañon River was found to be sister to a well-supported clade (Node 7: BI: 0.97, ML: 88)
containing P. albivermis from the San Alejandro River, a morphologically similar population
from the nearby Ucayali River (P. cf. albivermis Ucayali) and the morphologically distinct P.
n.sp. L425 (also from the Ucayali River). Within the clade containing all other lyretail species
having more typically angled mandibular tooth rows, two undescribed species from the
respective Moa and Napo river drainages were found to form a strongly monophyletic clade
(Node 4: BI: 1.0, ML: 99) that was sister to a moderately supported clade (Node 3: BI: 0.89, ML:
68) containing P. nocturnus, P. nix and two putatively undescribed species from the Madeira and
7
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
Huallaga river drainages. Within this latter clade, the putatively undescribed species P. n.sp.
Huallaga L351 was found to be sister to a well-supported clade containing the remaining three
species (Node 2: BI: 1.0, ML: 96). Within this last clade, P. nix and P. nocturnus were wellsupported as sister species (Node 1: BI: 1.00, ML: 99).
Together, the Orinoco clown plecos plus the lyretail clown plecos were found to be sister
to a third strongly monophyletic clade (Node 21: BI: 1.0, ML: 86) of boldly banded species
distributed throughout the Amazon Basin (hereafter: ‘tiger clown plecos’). Within the clade of
tiger clown plecos, a weakly supported clade (Node 20: BI: 0.62, ML: –) of two sister species (P.
purusiensis from the Purus River and P. n.sp. from the Curua Una River) was found to be sister
to a weakly supported clade containing all other species (Node 19: BI: 0.78, ML: 56). Within the
later clade, P. gnomus from the Marañon River was found to be sister to a moderately supported
clade containing all other species (Node 18: BI: 0.84, ML: 83). Relationships within the latter
clade were weakly and/or ambiguously supported. Bayesian analysis found this clade to
comprise moderate to weakly monophyletic sister clades that are respectively restricted to the
lower Amazon River and its southern tributaries (Node 17: BI: 0.91) and the upper Amazon
River and its northern tributaries (Node 15: BI: 0.56). The lower Amazon Basin clade contained
one described and two putatively undescribed species that are respectively distributed within the
lower Amazon River itself (P. n.sp. L397), and its southern tributaries the Xingu River (P.
tankei) and Tocantins River (P. n.sp. L002), with the Amazon and Xingu species being strongly
supported as monophyletic (Node 16: BI: 1.0, ML: 90). Relationships within the upper Amazon
Basin clade, comprising species from the Branco (P. claustellifer), the Negro (P. n.sp. L169), the
Itaya (P. changae) and the Ucayali (P. n.sp. L206) were all weakly supported in the Bayesian
(BI: <60) and maximum likelihood (SI Fig. 2) analyses. Mitochondrial data supported the same
three major clades within Panaqolus, although relationships within these clades differed (SI Fig.
3). Panaqolus intergeneric relationships were very weakly supported when only nuclear data
were examined (SI Fig. 4); however, the same individuals were still found to be part of a single
monophyletic clade exclusive of P. koko.
3.4 Generic relationships within the Hemiancistrus Clade, Figure 3, Table 3
Statistical support for monophyly of the Hemiancistrus Clade increased slightly in this study (Fig.
3, Node 19: BI: 0.88, ML: 63) from that of Lujan et al. (2015a; BI: 0.70, ML: 59). Both studies
found this clade to comprise the valid genera Hemiancistrus, Baryancistrus, Panaque,
Parancistrus, and Spectracanthicus plus a group of four incertae sedis species from the upper
Orinoco (‘Baryancistrus’ beggini, ‘B.’ demantoides, ‘Hemiancistrus’ guahiborum, ‘H.’
subviridis). Of these genera, Baryancistrus sensu stricto (exclusive of upper Orinoco species)
and Panaque were found to be strongly monophyletic (Nodes 7 and 12: BI: 1.0, ML: 100), as
was the group of upper Orinoco incertae sedis species (Node 17: BI: 0.99, ML: 68).
The clade containing Spectracanthicus + Parancistrus was also strongly monophyletic
(Node 9: BI: 1.0, ML: 100); however, neither genus was monophyletic in any of our analyses (SI
Figs. 1, 2 and 3). Both Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of the full dataset found the
Spectracanthicus + Parancistrus clade to comprise a strongly monophyletic clade of three
Parancistrus nudiventris individuals (SI Fig. 1 and 2; BI: 1.0, ML: 100) that was sister to a
strongly monophyletic clade (SI Figs. 1 and 2; BI: 1.0, ML: 92) of interleaved Parancistrus
nudiventris (n=2), Spectracanthicus punctatissimus (n=12), and S. zuanoni (n=4) individuals.
These relationships were largely paralleled in our analysis of nuclear data only (SI Fig. 4),
8
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
whereas mitochondrial data found the Hemiancistrus Clade genera to form two separate clades
that were not sister to each other: a clade of Amazonian and eastern Guiana Shield (H. medians)
genera (including similarly interleaved clade of Parancistrus and Spectracanthicus), and a clade
of Panaque plus upper Orinoco ‘Hemiancistrus’ and ‘Baryancistrus’.
3.5 Species relationships within Panaque, Figure 3, Table 3
Five described and one undescribed species were found to be included within the strongly
monophyletic genus Panaque (Node 7: BI: 1.0, ML: 100). Within this clade, our sole transAndean species, Panaque cochliodon from the Magdalena River basin, was weakly supported as
sister to an East Andean clade of all other Amazon and Orinoco Basin species (Node 6: BI: 0.74,
ML: 46). Within the latter clade, a clade of Orinoco Basin species was strongly supported as
monophyletic (Node 4: BI: 1.0, ML: 100), as was the widespread Amazonian clade of Panaque
schaeferi (upper Amazon and Amazon mainstream) and P. cf. armbrusteri (Xingu and Tocantins
rivers; Node 2: BI: 1.0, ML: 99). Within this latter clade, we found moderate support for
monophyly of P. cf. armbrusteri (Node 1: BI: 0.68, ML: 65). Although several P. bathyphilus
individuals from the Marañon and Madeira rivers were found to be strongly monophyletic (SI
Figs. 1 and 2: BI: 1.0, ML: 100), our analyses were inconclusive regarding this species’
phylogenetic position within the clade of East Andean Panaque. Relationships within Panaque
were generally poorly supported by nuclear data (SI Fig. 4), but similar and well supported by
mitochondrial data (SI Fig. 3).
3.6 Relative gut length and gut contents of ‘Panaqolus’ koko
Total length of the gastrointestinal tract of the single examined specimen (MHNG 2723.089,
88.3 mm SL) was 660 mm, or 7.5 times standard length (= relative intestine length, or RIL). Gut
contents consisted of amorphous detritus and many intact pieces of sponge, some large enough to
distend the intestines, as well as aggregations of what appeared to be sponge spicules.
4. Discussion
4.1 Overview
Results of this study and other recent molecular phylogenetic appraisals of the Hypostominae
(Lujan et al., 2015a; 2015b) suggest that already-high estimates of species-level diversity within
this subfamily may dramatically underestimate true diversity. Hypostominae is already known to
be the most species- and genus-rich subfamily within the Loricariidae – itself the fifth most
species-rich family of fishes and most species-rich family of catfishes. Current trends suggest
that species-level diversity will continue to rapidly expand as ichthyologists combine specimens
from increasingly remote drainages throughout tropical South America with increasingly precise
molecular methods for inferring species taxonomy and phylogeny. We strive to help bring order
to the ongoing proliferation of new species by erecting new subgenera for each of the three major,
strongly monophyletic, and biogeographically and morphologically distinct subclades within
genus Panaqolus.
4.2 New Panaqolus subgenera
9
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
4.2.1 Panaqoco, new subgenus
Common name: Orinoco clown plecos
4.2.1.1 Type species. Panaque maccus Schaefer and Stewart 1993:335, Figs. 18 and 19
Literature cited: Schaefer, S.A. and Stewart, D.J., 1993. Systematics of the Panaque
dentex species group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), wood-eating armored catfishes from tropical
South America. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 4:309–342.
4.2.1.2 Etymology. Panaqoco is a portmanteau of the genus name Panaqolus and the drainage
name Orinoco. The gender is masculine.
4.2.1.3 Diagnosis. Panaqoco is diagnosed from other members of the genus Panaqolus by the
absence of filamentous extensions on the unbranched principal caudal-fin rays and the absence
of either consistent oblique banding on the body or reticulate, wormline patterns across the entire
snout, having instead broken, inconsistent banding with occasional spots on the head and body
(Fig. 1).
4.2.1.4 Included species. The only currently described species in subgenus Panaqoco is the type
species Panaque maccus Schaefer and Stewart 1993. Morphotypes commonly referred to as
L448 and L465 are also included.
4.2.1.5 Distribution. Species in the subgenus Panaqoco are distributed throughout the Orinoco
River drainage, with populations primarily concentrated in piedmont habitats in rivers and
streams along the lower elevations of the Andes Mountains and the margins of the Guiana Shield.
4.2.2 Panafilus, new subgenus
Common name: lyretail clown plecos
4.2.2.1 Type species. Panaque albomaculatus Kanazawa 1958:327, Fig. 2
Literature cites: Kanazawa, R. H. 1958. A new species of catfish, family Loricariidae,
from Ecuador. Copeia 1958:327–328.
4.2.2.2 Etymology. Panafilus is a portmanteau of the genus name Panaqolus and the Latin word
‘filum’, meaning filament or fiber, in reference to the elongated unbranched principal caudal-fin
rays in all members of this subgenus. The gender is masculine.
4.2.2.3 Diagnosis. Panafilus is diagnosed from other members of the genus Panaqolus by having
both unbranched principal caudal-fin rays elongated as filaments extending up to over twice the
length of branched caudal-fin rays (vs. unbranched principal caudal-fin rays not elongated as
filaments), and by lacking broad and consistent brown bands on the body and fins, having
instead either small white, gold, or blue spots, vermiculate markings or irregular and inconsistent
narrow bands on a generally black or dark gray base color (Fig. 1).
4.2.2.4 Included species. Four currently described species are included in subgenus Panafilus:
the type species Panaque albomaculatus Kanazawa 1958, Panaque nocturnus Schaefer and
10
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
Stewart 1993, Panaqolus albivermis Lujan, Steele, and Velasquez 2013, and Panaqolus nix
Cramer and Rapp Py-Daniel 2015. Morphotypes commonly referred to as L351, L425, L453,
and L466 are also included.
4.2.2.5 Distribution. Species in the subgenus Panafilus are distributed throughout southwestern
tributaries of the upper Amazon Basin, including the Madeira, Ucayali, Huallaga, Marañon, and
Napo river drainages. Within these drainages, populations are primarily concentrated in
piedmont habitats along the lower elevation flanks of the Andes Mountains, although they can
also occur further downstream in main river channel habitats of the western Amazonian lowlands.
4.2.2.6. Dietary ecology. Most members of the subgenus Panafilus have upper and lower jaw
morphologies similar to those of other members of the genus Panaqolus – and indeed other
wood-eating genera – consisting of relatively few (<10) and short, spoon-shaped teeth arranged
in left and right rows with an angle between them of approximately 90º (Lujan and Armbruster,
2012). This jaw and tooth morphology is strongly associated with the ingestion of wood and the
assimilation of cellulosic carbon by members of the genera Panaqolus (e.g., P. nocturnus, P.
gnomus), Panaque (e.g., P. bathyphilus), and Cochliodon (C. pyrineusi, Lujan et al., 2011).
However, a strongly monophyletic clade within Panafilus (Fig. 2, Node 8: BI: 1.0, ML:
88, MP: 7) is distinguished from all congeners by having rows of more elongate dentary teeth
that are nearly parallel with the longitudinal body axis. In a study of dietary resource partitioning
within a diverse sympatric assemblage of wood-eating catfishes, Lujan et al. (2011) found that
one member of this clade – Panafilus albomaculatus – had higher nitrogen isotope (15N) values
than the four other sympatric wood-eating species listed above. Because 15N enrichment is
associated with both trophic level and the amount of protein in a consumers diet (Kelly and
Martinez del Rio, 2010), this suggests that the distinctive jaws of this subclade within Panafilus
are specialized for a more carnivorous diet that is relatively enriched in protein. Moreover,
Panafilus albomaculatus also had a carbon isotope value closer to that of seston than all other
wood-eating species, which all had carbon isotope values closer to that of wood (Lujan et al.,
2011). This further suggests that P. albomaculatus assimilate less wood carbon than its
congeners, and derive energy from a distinctive source such as, perhaps, macroinvertebrate
collectors of seston such as crevice-dwelling caddisfly (Trichoptera) and pyralid (Lepidoptera)
larvae.
Given these dietary isotope patterns and jaw models suggesting that longitudinally
elongate jaws and teeth would be capable of greater protrusion than the angled jaws of other
wood-eater species (Lujan and Armbruster, 2012), we hypothesize that these jaws are specialized
for the consumption of aquatic invertebrates from within cracks or depressions in the surface of
dead wood. Aquatic invertebrates often seek refuge from predation in small spaces along the
surfaces of submerged substrates, and the evolution of narrowly protrusible or elongate jaws has
occurred both in other invertivorous loricariid genera (e.g., Leporacanthicus, Scobinancistrus,
Spatuloricaria) and in many other riverine fish families (e.g., Anostomidae, Apteronotidae,
Doradidae, Mormyridae), where such specializations are invariably also associated with the
consumption of substrate-dwelling invertebrates (Marrero and Winemiller, 1993; Lujan and
Conway, 2015).
4.2.3 Panaqolus, new subgenus
Common name: tiger clown plecos
11
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
4.2.3.1 Type species. Panaque gnomus Schaefer and Stewart 1993:333, Fig. 27
Literature cited: Schaefer, S.A. and Stewart, D.J., 1993. Systematics of the Panaque
dentex species group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), wood-eating armored catfishes from tropical
South America. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 4:309–342.
4.2.3.2 Etymology. The genus name Panaqolus is retained for this subgenus that includes the
type species for the genus.
4.2.3.3 Diagnosis. The subgenus Panaqolus is diagnosed from other members of its genus by
lacking filamentous elongations of the unbranched caudal-fin rays, by having light to dark brown
coloration (vs. black to dark gray in Panafilus), and by having generally consistent, broad,
oblique bands on the body, consistent and distinct bands on the fins, and/or reticulate, wormline
patterns covering the entire snout (Fig. 1).
4.2.3.4 Included species. Four currently described species are included in subgenus Panaqolus:
the type species Panaque gnomus Schaefer and Stewart 1993, Panaque purusiensis La Monte
1935, Panaque changae Chockley and Armbruster 2002, and Panaqolus claustellifer Tan, Souza
and Armbruster 2016. Morphotypes commonly referred to as L002, L169, L206, L397, L398,
and L459 are also included.
4.2.3.5 Distribution. Species in the subgenus Panaqolus are widely distributed throughout the
Amazon Basin including northern tributaries like the Branco and Negro, western tributaries like
the Purus, Ucayali, and Itaya, and southern tributaries like the Tapajós, Xingu, and Tocantins.
Throughout this region, members of the subgenus Panaqolus are often not most abundant in
piedmont habitats, but are rather more common in the lower courses of large river channels.
4.3 New genus for ‘Panaqolus’ koko
4.3.1 Pseudoqolus, new genus
4.3.1.1 Type species. Panaqolus koko Fisch-Muller & Covain 2012:184, Figs. 7, 13, 14
Literature cited: Fisch-Muller, S., Montoya-Burgos, J.I., le Bail, P.-Y., and Covain, R.
2012. Diversity of the Ancistrini (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the Guianas: the Panaque
group, a molecular appraisal with descriptions of new species. Cybium 36:163–191.
4.3.1.2 Etymology. Pseudoqolus is a portmanteau of the Greek word pseudes meaning false and
the genus name Panaqolus, indicating that although this genus may look superficially like
Panaqolus, such an appearance is false.
4.3.1.3 Diagnosis. Pseudoqolus can be diagnosed from Panaqolus and all other genera in the
Hypostominae (sensu Lujan et al., 2015a) except Scobinancistrus by having bicuspid teeth with a
robust, inflexible shaft and broad principal cusp at least four times as wide as secondary cusp
(Fisch-Muller et al., 2012; vs. teeth typically unicuspid in Panaqolus and slender with principal
cusp no more than twice as wide as secondary cusp in all other genera except Scobinancistrus).
Pseudoqolus can be diagnosed from Scobinancistrus by having a typically short principal cusp,
12
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
no more than half of total emergent tooth length (vs. up to two thirds of total emergent tooth
length), and by having four to six premaxillary and dentary teeth (vs. rarely more than three).
4.3.1.4 Included species. Pseudoqolus contains only the type species Panaqolus koko FischMuller & Covain 2012.
4.3.1.5 Distribution. Pseudoqolus is known only from the upper Maroni River drainage near
Antecume Pata in French Guiana (Fisch-Muller et al., 2012).
4.3.1.6 Phylogenetic position. In the results of this study and that of Lujan et al. (2015a),
Pseudoqolus koko was found to be included in a strongly monophyletic clade (Fig. 2, Node 43:
BI: 0.97, ML: 63) that also included Panaqolus, Peckoltia, and a strongly monophyletic
Scobinancistrus + Ancistomus. Neither this study nor Lujan et al. (2015a) found any support for
Pseudoqolus koko to be more closely related to Panaqolus than to any of the other three genera
in this clade; nor was its exact position relative to these other genera consistently and
unambiguously resolved given that monophyly of the clade containing the genera Ancistomus,
Panaqolus, Peckoltia, Scobinancistrus is weakly supported (Node 42: BI: 0.84, ML: 26).
Regardless of the relatively weak, albeit consistent, support for exclusion of Pseudoqolus
from the clade containing these four genera, it seems, given the consistently strong monophyly of
each constituent genus, that it is unlikely that additional data would shift Ps. koko to a position
within one of these existing clades. Topological results plus its diagnostic morphological
characteristics and non-wood eating diet (see below), justify the erection of a new genus for this
species. In addition to the diagnostic morphological characters, Pseudoqolus koko is further
distinguished from Panaqolus sensu stricto by head and body shape differences, including an
elongated snout, a small but distinct occipital crest, narrower head and smaller interorbital
distance (Fisch-Muller et al., 2012). Osteological analyses might well provide additional
characters to reinforce this taxonomic hypothesis.
In their original description of Pseudoqolus koko, Fisch-Muller et al. (2012) suggested
that Ps. koko may likely be introgressed with the sympatric-syntopic species Peckoltia otali
based on similarity of a 648 bp portion of these two species’ mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase
I (COI) gene sequence. Between these two species, Fisch-Muller et al. (2012) recorded only five
silent transitions in their COI sequence data. To test the hypothesis that historical hybridization
may have led to mitochondrial introgression and, therefore, an artificial increase in overall
genetic distance between Ps. koko and members of the genus Panaqolus sensu stricto, we
conducted separate maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial vs. nuclear data.
Relationships recovered in the nuclear analysis (SI Fig. 4) largely paralleled those of our full
analysis – consistent with Ps. koko representing a new genus – although maximum likelihood
bootstrap support values were much lower. However, our mitochondrial analysis (SI Fig. 3)
supported the Peckoltia-introgression hypothesis of Fisch-Muller et al. (2012) by finding Ps.
koko to be sister to a clade composed mostly of Amazon Basin species of Peckoltia (i.e.,
exclusive of Pe. pankimpuju and a clade of upper Orinoco Peckoltia). Peckoltia otali was not
included in our analysis but our results are consistent with the Fisch-Muller et al. (2012)
hypothesis that Ps. koko inherited its mitochondrial genome from a co-occurring member of the
genus Peckoltia.
13
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
4.3.1.7 Biogeographical patterns. Regardless of the phylogenetic position of Pseudoqolus koko
outside of Panaqolus, Peckoltia, and Scobinancistrus + Ancistomus, it seems likely that this
narrow endemic of the Maroni River, which drains the northeastern slope of the Guiana Shield
along the northeastern coast of South America, is sister to a much more species rich and
geographically widespread clade distributed predominantly (or entirely) within the Amazon
Basin. Such a pattern would make Ps. koko one more of a growing list of relatively species-poor
Guiana Shield endemic or specialist (sensu Lujan and Armbruster, 2011) fish lineages that are
sister to much more diverse and geographically widespread Neotropical clades. Other examples
include Hemiancistrus medians, Lithogenes, Pseudolithoxus, and the Cichlidae clade of
Guianacara + Mazarunia (López-Fernández et al., 2010). A more extensive discussion of the
historical biogeography of the freshwater fishes of the Guiana Shield and their relationships to
other Amazonian lineages can be found in Lujan and Armbruster (2011).
4.3.1.8 Relative gut length and gut contents. The Pseudoqolus koko relative intestine length
(RIL) of 7.5 compares to mean RILs of approximately 11.5 for species of the wood-eating
genera Panaque and Panaqolus (German, 2009). The approximately 35% shorter gastrointestinal
tract of Ps. koko compared to demonstrably specialized wood-eating taxa is consistent with a
hypothesis that this genus and species may be specialized for a more protein rich, non-wood diet
(Pouilly et al., 2003). This is also consistent with the gut contents of the single examined
individual consisting largely of intact sponge fragments and spicules.
4.4 Paraphyly within the Hemiancistrus Clade
This study included more individuals of several Hemiancistrus Clade species than the previous
study of Lujan et al. (2015a), providing a more thorough evaluation of the monophyly of these
species and their genera. Although all species in the Panaque and upper Orinoco ‘Hemiancistrus’
clade were found to by monophyletic, multiple instances of genus and species paraphyly were
observed within the lower Amazon clade of Baryancistrus sensu stricto, Parancistrus, and
Spectracanthicus. We discuss these results here and report them in our supplemental figures but
have excluded them from our manuscript figures because these taxa and their monophyly were
not a primary goal of our study.
First, Baryancistrus xanthellus from the lower Xingu River (represented by three
specimens having tissue tags B1490, B2064, and B2163; Table 1) was found to be paraphyletic
with respect to the distinctive yet undescribed species or color morph B. n.sp. L142 from the
neighboring Tapajós River (represented by a single specimen). In both our Bayesian and
maximum likelihood analyses of the full mitonuclear alignment, B. xanthellus formed a
monophyletic clade inclusive of B. n.sp. L142, but in our analysis of nuclear data alone, one B.
xanthellus individual (tissue tag: B2064) was found to be part of a well supported (ML: 81) clade
with B. chrysolomus. All three of these species exhibit highly distinctive color patterns, with B.
xanthellus juveniles having a dark black base color, distinct golden yellow spots, and golden
yellow marginal bands along the dorsal and caudal fins, B. chrysolomus having a dark green base
color and yellow dorsal- and caudal-fin bands but lacking spots entirely, and B. n.sp. L142
having a dark black base color with distinct white spots and no marginal fin bands.
A second complex pattern of paraphyly was observed in the clade containing
Parancistrus nudiventris (represented by five individuals; Table 1), Spectracanthicus
punctatissimus (represented by 12 individuals; Table 1), and S. zuanoni (represented by four
14
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
individuals; Table 1). Although this clade as a whole was consistently strongly monophyletic
(Fig. 3, Node 9: BI: 1.0, ML: 100), none of the three species within the clade were ever found to
be monophyletic, despite all three of them having highly distinctive color patterns and/or body
morphologies. The paraphyly of these species persisted throughout all analyses; however, both of
our full mitonuclear analyses found a strongly monophyletic (SI Figs. 1 and 2; BI: 1.0, ML: 100)
clade of three Parancistrus nudiventris individuals that was sister to an also strongly
monophyletic clade of all other individuals (SI Figs. 1 and 2; BI: 1.0, ML: 92). We hypothesize,
based on these results and on an independent genomic analysis of these taxa by the first author,
that this pattern is the result of relatively recent and rapid hybridization among all three species;
however, further investigation of this intriguing but clearly complex pattern is needed.
4.5 Reproductive behavior
As with many other members of the subfamily Hypostominae (e.g., Ancistrus, Chaetostoma,
Pseudancistrus pectegenitor; Sabaj et al. 1999, Page et al. 1993, Lujan et al. 2007) spawning in
the genus Panaqolus usually occurs in caves with the male caring for the eggs and early life
history stages. Several members of both the subgenera Panaqoco and Panaqolus are common in
the aquarium hobby and spawn relatively easily and frequently in captivity; however, members
of the subgenus Panafilus have only rarely been spawned in captivity, perhaps due to their larger
body size, higher cost, and relative scarcity in the hobby. Likewise, the relatively large-bodied
genus Panaque has only rarely been spawned in captivity.
4.6 Conservation
Neotropical freshwater fishes face a wide range of conservation threats, the most prominent and
severe of which is habitat destruction from hydroelectric dams and in-stream gold mines (Lujan
et al., 2013b; Reis et al. 2016; Winemiller et al. 2016). However, given the focus of this paper on
species that are exploited for the ornamental fish trade, the potential threat of overfishing should
be given special attention. Published data on the commercial exploitation of loricariid catfishes
are scarce. In some of the few studies of major freshwater ornamental fisheries in the Neotropics,
Moreau and Coomes (2007) and Gerstner et al. (2006) examined harvests in Peru, which – along
with Brazil and Colombia – is one of the three largest South American sources of ornamental
fishes (Chapman et al., 1997). Moreau and Coomes (2007) found that loricariids comprised
approximately 32% of the volume of fishes exported from the Peruvian Amazon, and Gerstner et
al. (2006) found that habitats under greatest ornamental fishing pressure near the major fish
export center of Iquitos had reduced fish diversity, abundance, and biomass. Ornamental fish
harvests have at least the potential to alter community structure and cause local wild population
declines, but more finely resolved taxonomies and more data on natural community composition
and population density are needed to adequately understand and address such impacts. Our study
and other recent research (Alofs et al., 2013) illustrate the significant gaps that exist in our
understanding of Neotropical fish diversity, and the extent to which potential threats may be
underestimated if such gaps are not addressed.
5. Conclusions
15
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
Our finding that approximately half of the species-level diversity in the widespread genus
Panaqolus may remain undescribed is illustrative of the extent to which total taxonomic
diversity of even commercially exploited Amazonian fish lineages may remain underestimated
by current taxonomies. Our erection of strongly monophyletic subgenera for the species-rich
genus Panaqolus should help to facilitate both the conservation and taxonomic description of
species by making at least the major clades easier to identify and by restricting the number of
congeners that future taxonomists would have to examine to adequately diagnosis new
Panaqolus species. Moreover, our strong phylogenetic support for large-scale biogeographical
influence on the diversification of Panaqolus helps to justify and spatially delimit studies by
regional researchers with regular access only to collections representing regional diversity.
It is clear from the biogeographical patterns observed in both Panaqolus and Panaque, as
well as the Cochliodon group examined elsewhere (e.g., Armbruster, 2003), that Andean
affluents of the southwestern Amazon Basin are an epicenter of wood-eating fish diversity, with
some drainages having up to five different sympatric but unrelated species of wood-eating
catfish coexisting on the same pieces of submerged wood. See Lujan et al. (2011) for a detailed
study of trophic resource partitioning in one such diverse assemblage.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge our principal foreign collaborators Otto Castillo (MCNG,
Venezuela), Oscar Leon Mata (MCNG, Venezuela), Hernán Ortega (MUSM, Peru), and Lucia
Rapp Py-Daniel (INPA, Brazil) for ensuring the legal collection and export of specimens; the
collection managers and museum workers Erling Holm, Mary Burridge, Marg Zur (ROM), Mark
Sabaj Pérez (ANSP), David Werneke (AUM), Dan Wylie (INHS), and aquarium fish importer
Oliver Lucanus for generously sharing information, processing specimen loans, and gifting
tissues and gDNA extracts; the expedition participants Blanca Rengifo (MUSM), Krista Capps
(CU), Alex Flecker (CU), Donovan German (UF), Oscar Leon Mata (MCNG), Mark Sabaj Pérez
(ANSP), and David Werneke (AUM) for helping to collect specimens and tissues; and the
laboratory technicians Kristen Choffe and Oliver Haddrath (ROM) for helping to generate
sequence data. Andreas Tanke provided most of the tissue samples from the undescribed
Panaqolus species, live photos of aquarium specimens, and contributed with valuable
discussions on our group of interest. Funding for this research came from NSF OISE-1064578
(International Research Fellowship) to NKL, NSF DEB-0315963 (Planetary Biodiversity
Inventory: All Catfish Species), National Geographic Committee for Research and Exploration
grant #8721-09 to NKL, the Coypu Foundation, the Aquatic Critter Inc., and the estate of George
and Carolyn Kelso via the International Sportfish Fund. CAC benefited from a DCR fellowship
from Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and
SEPLAN-RO (process 350674/2010-8). Additional funding came from NSF grant DEB 0516831
to K.O. Winemiller, R.L. Honeycutt and HLF, a Conservation Research grant from the Life in
Crisis: Schad Gallery of Biodiversity and Museum Volunteers research grants (2009, 2010) from
the Royal Ontario Museum to HLF, and Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council of Canada to HLF. Salary support for NKL provided by
NSF DEB-1257813 (the iXingu Project) and the Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Appendix A. Supplemental Information
16
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
Supplemental Figure 1: Complete results of the full Bayesian phylogenetic analysis.
Supplemental Figure 2: Complete results of the full maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis.
Supplemental Figure 3: Complete results of the maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of
mitochondrial loci only.
Supplemental Figure 4: Complete results of the maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of
nuclear loci only.
References
Alofs, K.M., Liverpool, E.A., Taphorn, D.C., Bernard, C.R., López-Fernández, H., 2013. Mind
the (information) gap: the importance of exploration and discovery for assessing
conservation priorities for freshwater fish. Diversity and Distributions 2013, 1–7.
Armbruster, J.W., 2003. The species of the Hypostomus cochliodon group (Siluriformes:
Loricariidae). Zootaxa 249, 1–60.
Armbruster, J.W., 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of the suckermouth armoured catfishes
(Loricariidae) with emphasis on the Hypostominae and the Ancistrinae. Zoological Journal
of the Linnean Society 141, 1–80.
Armbruster, J.W., 2008. The genus Peckoltia with the description of two new species and a
reanalysis of the phylogeny of the genera of the Hypostominae (Siluriformes: Loricariidae).
Zootaxa 1822, 1–76.
Chapman, F.M., Fitz-Coy, S.A., Thunberg, E.M., Adams, C.M., 1997. United States of America
trade in ornamental fishes. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 28, 1–10.
Chockley, B.R., Armbruster, J.W., 2002. Panaque changae, a new species of catfish
(Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from eastern Peru. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters
13, 81–90.
Cramer, C.A., Bonatto, S.L., Reis, R.E., 2011. Molecular phylogeny of the Neoplecostominae
and Hypoptopomatinae (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) using multiple genes. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 59, 43–52.
Cramer, C.A., Rapp Py-Daniel, L.H., 2015. A new species of Panaqolus (Siluriformes:
Loricariidae) from the rio Madeira basin with remarkable intraspecific color variation.
Neotropical Ichthyology 13, 461–470.
Cramer, C.A., de Sousa, L.M. 2016. A new species of tiger pleco Panaqolus (Siluriformes:
Loricariidae) from the Xingu Basin, Brazil. PLoS ONE 11:e0165388.
Dignall, J., 2014. List of original l-numbers.
(http://www.planetcatfish.com/shanesworld/shanesworld.php?article_id=514). Originally
uploaded 16 May 2014.
Fisch-Muller, S., Montoya-Burgos, J.I., le Bail, P.-Y., Covain, R., 2012. Diversity of the
Ancistrini (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the Guianas: the Panaque group, a molecular
appraisal with descriptions of new species. Cybium 36, 163–191.
German, D.P., 2009. Inside the guts of wood-eating catfishes: can they digest wood? Journal of
Comparative Physiology B 179, 1011–1023.
Gerstner, C.L., Ortega, H., Sanchez, H., Graham, D.L., 2006. Effects of the freshwater aquarium
trade on wild fish populations in differentially-fishes areas of the Peruvian Amazon.
Journal of Fish Biology 68, 862–875.
17
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
Hardman, M., 2005. The phylogenetic relationships among non-diplomystid catfishes as inferred
from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences; the search for the ictalurid sister taxon
(Otophysi: Siluriformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37, 700720.
Hollanda-Carvalho, P., Weber, C., 2004. Five new species of the Hypostomus cochliodon group
(Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the middle and lower Amazon System. Revue Suisse de
Zoologie 111, 953–978.
Kelly, L.J., Martinez del Rio, C., 2010. The fate of carbon in growing fish: an experimental study
of isotopic routing. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 83, 473–480.
Li, C., Ortí, G., Zhang, G., Lu, G., 2007. A practical approach to phylogenomics: the phylogeny
of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) as a case study. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7, 1–11.
López-Fernández, H., Winemiller, K.O., Honeycutt, R.L., 2010. Multilocus phylogeny and rapid
radiations in Neotropical cichlid fishes (Perciformes: Cichlidae: Cichlinae). Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 55, 1070–1086.
Lujan, N.K., Armbruster, J.W., Sabaj, M.H., 2007. Two new species of Pseudancistrus from
southern Venezuela (Siluriformes: Loricariidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters
18, 163–174.
Lujan, N.K., Hidalgo, M., Stewart, D.J., 2010. Revision of Panaque (Panaque), with
descriptions of three new species from the Amazon Basin (Siluriformes, Loricariidae).
Copeia 2010, 676–704.
Lujan, N.K., Armbruster, J.W., 2011. The Guiana Shield. In: Albert, J., Reis, R. (Eds.),
Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press,
Berkeley, pp. 211–224
Lujan, N.K., German, D.P., Winemiller, K.O., 2011. Do wood grazing fishes partition their
niche?: Morphological and isotopic evidence for trophic segregation in Neotropical
Loricariidae. Functional Ecology 25, 1327–1338.
Lujan, N.K., Armbruster, J.W., 2012. Morphological and functional diversity of the mandible in
suckermouth armored catfishes (Siluriformes, Loricarioidea). Journal of Morphology 273,
24–39.
Lujan, N.K., Steele, S., Velasquez, M., 2013a. A new distinctively banded species of Panaqolus
(Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the western Amazon Basin in Peru. Zootaxa 3691, 192–
198.
Lujan, N.K., Roach, K.A., Jacobsen, D., Winemiller, K.O., Meza Vargas, V., Rimarachín Ching,
V., Maestre, J.A., 2013b. Aquatic community structure across an Andes-to-Amazon fluvial
gradient. Journal of Biogeography 40, 1715–1728.
Lujan, N.K., Conway, K.W., 2015. Life in the fastlane: a review of rheophily in freshwater
fishes: Plath, M., Riesch, R., Tobler, M. (Eds.), Extremophile Fishes. Springer, Switzerland,
pp. 107–136.
Lujan, N.K., Armbruster, J.W., Lovejoy, N.R., López-Fernández, H., 2015a. Multilocus
molecular phylogeny of the suckermouth armored catfishes (Siluriformes: Loricariidae)
with a focus on subfamily Hypostominae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 82, 269–
288.
Lujan, N.K., Meza-Vargas, V., Astudillo-Clavijo, V., Barriga-Salazar, R., López-Fernández, H.,
2015b. Multilocus molecular phylogeny for Chaetostoma Clade genera and species with a
review of Chaetostoma (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the central Andes. Copeia 103,
664–701.
Marrero, C., Winemiller, K.O., 1993. Tube-snouted gymnotiform and mormyriform fishes:
18
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
convergence of a specialized foraging mode in teleosts. Environmental Biology of Fishes
38, 299–309.
Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W., Schwartz, T., 2010. "Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for
inference of large phylogenetic trees" in Proceedings of the Gateway Computing
Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA pp 1–8.
Moreau, M.-A., Coomes, O.T., 2007. Aquarium fish exploitation in western Amazonia:
conservation issues in Peru. Environmental Conservation 34, 12–22.
Page, L.M., Mottesi, G.B., Retzer, M.E., Ceas, P.A., Taphorn, D., 1993. Spawning habitat and
larval development of Chaetostoma stanii (Loricariidae) from Rio Crucito, Venezuela.
Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 4, 93–95.
Pouilly, M., Lino, F., Bretenoux, J.-G., Rosales, C., 2003. Dietary-morphological relationships in
a fish assemblage of the Bolivian Amazonian floodplain. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 1137–
1158.
Rambaut A., Drummond, A.J., Suchard, M., 2007. Tracer v1.6. <
http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/>.
Reis, R.E., Albert, J.S., Di Dario, F., Mincarone, M.M., Petry, P., Rocha, L.A., 2016. Fish
biodiversity and conservation in South America. Journal of Fish Biology 89, 12–47.
Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P., 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed
models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574.
Sabaj, M.H., Armbruster, J.W., Page, L.M., 1999. Spawning in Ancistrus (Siluriformes:
Loricariidae) with comments on the evolution of snout tentacles as a novel reproductive
strategy: larval mimicry. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 10, 217–229.
Schaefer, S.A., Stewart, D.J., 1993. Systematics of the Panaque dentex species group
(Siluriformes: Loricariidae), wood-eating armored catfishes from tropical South America.
Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 4, 309–342.
Stamatakis, A., 2014. RAxML Version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of
large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313.
Stawikowski, R., 1988. Harnischwelse aus südlichen Amazonaszuflüssen. Die Aquarien- und
Terrarienzeitschrift (DATZ) 41, 556–558
Tan, M., de Souza, L.S., Armbruster, J.W. 2016. A new species of Panaqolus (Siluriformes:
Loricariidae) from the rio Branco. Neotropical Ichthyology 14, e150033.
Wesselingh, F.P., Hoorn, C., 2011. Geological development of Amazon and Orinoco Basins.
Pages 59-67 in James S. Albert & Robert E. Reis, editor. Historical Biogeography of
Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Winemiller, K.O. et al., 2016. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo,
and Mekong: Basin-scale planning is needed to minimize impacts in mega-diverse rivers.
Science 351, 128–129.
19
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
Figure Legends:
Fig. 1. Voucher specimens examined in this study, from the new subgenus Panafilus (lyretail
clown plecos): (1) Pf. albivermis, (2) Pf. albomaculatus, (3) Pf. nocturnus, (4) Pf. n.sp. Huallaga
L329, (5) Pf. n.sp. Huallaga L351, (6) Pf. n.sp. Ucayali L425, (7) Pf. n.sp. Moa L453, (8) Pf.
n.sp. Napo L466, (9) Pf. nix, (10) Pf. n.sp. Madeira; new subgenus Panaqoco (Orinoco clown
plecos): (11) Pc. maccus, (12) Pc. n.sp. Tomo L465, (13) Pc. n.sp. Orinoco L448; new subgenus
Panaqolus (the tiger clown plecos): (14) Pq. changae, (15) Pq. gnomus, (16) Pq. purusiensis,
(17) Pq. n.sp. Curua Una, (18) Pq. n.sp. Tocantins L002, (19) Pq. n.sp. Negro L169, (20) Pq.
n.sp. Ucayali L206, (21) Pq. n.sp. Branco L306, (22) Pq. n.sp. Amazon L397, (23) Pq. tankei,
(24) Pq. n.sp. Itaya L459; and new genus Pseudoqolus: (25) Ps. koko.
Fig. 2. Phylogenetic relationships of taxa within the Peckoltia Clade (Loricariidae,
Hypostominae), including the new genus (n.gen.) Pseudoqolus and new subgenera (N.SG)
Panafilus (lyretail clown plecos), Panaqoco (Orinoco clown plecos), and Panaqolus (tiger clown
plecos), based on Bayesian analysis of a 4293 base pair alignment consisting of two
mitochondrial (16S, Cyt b) and three nuclear loci (RAG1, RAG2, MyH6). Node numbers
correspond to Bayesian posterior probability (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) support values
in Table 2. Numbers in italics indicate BI < 0.90; numbers in red indicate ML < 60. Samples
taken from at or near the type locality for a given species are indicated by an asterisk (*) and
specimens representing species that are types for their genus are indicated by a cross (†).
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of genera within the Hemiancistrus Clade (Loricariidae,
Hypostominae) based on Bayesian analysis of a 4293 base pair alignment consisting of two
mitochondrial (16S, Cyt b) and three nuclear loci (RAG1, RAG2, MyH6). Node numbers
correspond to Bayesian posterior probability (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) support values
in Table 3. Numbers in italics indicate BI < 0.90; numbers in red indicate ML < 60. Samples
taken from at or near the type locality for a given species are indicated by an asterisk (*) and
specimens representing species that are types for their genus are indicated by a cross (†).
Table Headings:
Table 1. Loci sequenced, voucher catalog number and country and river drainage of origin for
the tissue samples analyzed in this study. Boxes demarcate sequences concatenated from
conspecific individuals. Taxa are listed in indented groupings according to family, subfamily,
and tribe (if described) or tribe-level clade (if undescribed), with tribe-level clades following
Lujan et al. (2015a). ‘Type specimen’ indicates that a voucher was either part of the type series
for that species or was collected from at or near the type locality.
Table 2. Support values for each of the Peckoltia Clade nodes in Fig. 2, derived from Bayesian
inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) optimality criteria. Numbers in italics indicate BI
< 0.90; numbers in bold indicate ML < 60.
Table 3. Support values for each of the Hemiancistrus Clade nodes in Fig. 3, derived from
Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) optimality criteria. Numbers in italics
indicate BI < 0.90; numbers in bold indicate ML < 60.
20
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
• Respective genera Panaqolus (exclusive of putative congener ‘Panaqolus’ koko) and Panaque
are strongly monophyletic.
• Within Panaqolus s.s., species are distributed across three strongly monophyletic clades.
• New subgenera are erected for each of the three subclades within Panaqolus.
• A new genus is erected for the enigmatic species ‘Panaqolus’ koko.
• Western tributaries of the Amazon Basin are an epicenter of wood-eating catfish diversity.
Taxa
Trichomycteridae
Vandellia sp.
Callichthyidae
Corydoradinae
Corydoras panda
Corydoras stenocephalus
Astroblepidae
Astroblepus sp.
Astroblepus sp.
Loricariidae
Lithogininae
Lithogenes villosus
Lithogenes villosus
Delturinae
Hemipsilichthys gobio
Loricariinae
Harttiini
Cteniloricaria platystoma
Farlowellini
Farlowella vittata
Sturisoma cf. monopelte
Loricariini
Rineloricaria fallax
Hypoptopomatinae
Neoplecostomini
Pareiorhaphis steindachneri
Hypostominae
Chaetostoma Clade
Chaetostoma bifurcum
Chaetostoma dermorhynchum
Chaetostoma fischeri
Chaetostoma n.sp. Meta L445
Chaetostoma vasquezi
Dolichancistrus carnegiei
Transancistrus santarosensis
Ancistrini
Ancistrus clementinae
Ancistrus ranunculus
Corymbophanes kaiei
Dekeyseria pulchra
Dekeyseria scaphirhyncha
Guyanancistrus brevispinis
Hopliancistrus tricornis
Lasiancistrus schomburgkii
Lasiancistrus tentaculatus
Lithoxancistrus orinoco
Lithoxancistrus yekuana
Neblinichthys brevibracchium
Neblinichthys echinasus
Paulasquama callis
Tissue
#
Type specimen
Type species
# of loci
16S
Cytb
RAG1
RAG2
Myh6
Table 1
X
Voucher Cat #
X AUM 43867
Country
Drainage
Venezuela
Orinoco River
unknown
Bolivia
Mamoré River
V5509
2 X
T12932
T12839
4 X X X X ROM 94924
5 X X X X X ROM 90345
CH146
CH161
5 X X X X X MUSM uncataloged Peru
5 X X X X X MUSM uncataloged Peru
Huallaga River
Huallaga River
T17140
T9048
5 X X X X X ROM
4 X X
X X AUM 62934
Guyana
Guyana
Potaro River
Potaro River
T14765
4 X X X
Brazil
Pirapetinga River
T06287
4 X X X X
ROM 85921
Guyana
Essequibo River
V5314
T06853
4 X X X X AUM 42218
5 X X X X X ROM 86207
Guyana
Rupununi Rive
G5063
5 X X X X X AUM 44444
Guyana
Essequibo River
X MCP 42452
Genbank
T13602
T14258
T9026
T12930
T09945
6650
T13980
Genbank
*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
*
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
ROM 93687
ROM 93656
STRI 7604
ROM 94925
AUM 53812
ANSP 189598
X ROM 93798
Ecuador
Ecuador
Panama
Colombia
Venezuela
Colombia
Ecuador
Esmeraldas River
Pastaza River
Chagres River
Meta River
Caura River
Magdalena River
Santa Rosa River
T13829 *
B1500 *
T12637
V5296
T09540
SU01-121*
T9017
P6125
T09686
T09663
T9004 *
T06068 *
T06066 *
T06189 *
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ecuador
Brazil
Guyana
Venezuela
Venezuela
Suriname
unknown
Peru
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Guyana
Guyana
Guyana
Guayas River
Xingu River
Potaro River
Atabapo River
Ventuari River
Nickerie River
*
*
†
†
†
†
ROM 93737
ANSP 199525
ROM 89856
AUM 44110
AUM 54309
MHNG 2621.073
AUM 39853
AUM 45548
AUM 53895
AUM 54439
AUM 39473
ROM 83692
ROM 83692
X ROM 83784
Marañon River
Ventuari River
Ventuari River
Ventuari River
Mazaruni River
Mazaruni River
Mazaruni River
Table 2
Nod
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
PP
0.97
0.55
1.00
—
0.53
0.99
0.97
0.65
0.64
0.84
1.00
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.94
1.00
1.00
1.00
—
—
0.99
0.93
0.57
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.59
0.96
0.62
1.00
1.00
0.92
0.90
0.86
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.58
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
ML
78
47
100
48
51
100
87
76
71
70
100
35
82
99
86
92
98
81
100
100
94
55
44
61
27
79
100
100
90
95
100
–
71
—
100
92
79
90
74
100
77
85
100
44
99
98
86
92
Clade Name
Ancistomus sabaji
Ancistomus sabaji + An. furcata
Etsaputu relictum
Ancistomus
Ancistomus + Etsaputu
Peckoltia lineola + Pe. vittata (Xingu)
Peckoltia braueri + Pe. Compta
Peckoltia
upper Orinoco "Peckoltia "
Panaqolus gnomus + Pa. n.sp. L306
Panaqolus albomaculatus + Pa. maccus
Panaqolus
Scobinancistrus aureatus + Sc. pariolispos
Scobinancistrus
"Peckoltia " feldbergae
Hypancistrus
New genus n. sp. Xingu L269
Isorineloricaria + L269
Squaliforma emarginatus + Sq. squalinus
Squaliforma
Peckoltini
Hypostomus boulengeri + Hy. commersoni
Hypostomus rhantos + Hy. Robinii
Hypostomus
Cochliodon macushi + Co. pyrineusi
Cochliodon hondae + Co. plecosotmoides
Cochliodon
Cochliodon + Hypostomus
Table 3
Nod
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
PP
0.97
0.55
1.00
—
0.53
0.99
0.97
0.65
0.64
0.84
1.00
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.94
1.00
1.00
1.00
—
—
0.99
0.93
0.57
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.59
0.96
0.62
1.00
1.00
0.92
0.90
0.86
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.58
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
ML
78
47
100
48
51
100
87
76
71
70
100
35
82
99
86
92
98
81
100
100
94
55
44
61
27
79
100
100
90
95
100
–
71
—
100
92
79
90
74
100
77
85
100
44
99
98
86
92
Clade Name
Ancistomus sabaji
Ancistomus sabaji + An. furcata
Etsaputu relictum
Ancistomus
Ancistomus + Etsaputu
Peckoltia lineola + Pe. vittata (Xingu)
Peckoltia braueri + Pe. Compta
Peckoltia
upper Orinoco "Peckoltia "
Panaqolus gnomus + Pa. n.sp. L306
Panaqolus albomaculatus + Pa. maccus
Panaqolus
Scobinancistrus aureatus + Sc. pariolispos
Scobinancistrus
"Peckoltia " feldbergae
Hypancistrus
New genus n. sp. Xingu L269
Isorineloricaria + L269
Squaliforma emarginatus + Sq. squalinus
Squaliforma
Peckoltini
Hypostomus boulengeri + Hy. commersoni
Hypostomus rhantos + Hy. Robinii
Hypostomus
Cochliodon macushi + Co. pyrineusi
Cochliodon hondae + Co. plecosotmoides
Cochliodon
Cochliodon + Hypostomus
Taxa
Trichomycteridae
Vandellia sp.
Callichthyidae
Corydoradinae
Corydoras panda
Corydoras stenocephalus
Astroblepidae
Astroblepus sp.
Astroblepus sp.
Loricariidae
Lithogininae
Lithogenes villosus
Lithogenes villosus
Delturinae
Hemipsilichthys gobio
Loricariinae
Harttiini
Cteniloricaria platystoma
Farlowellini
Farlowella vittata
Sturisoma cf. monopelte
Loricariini
Rineloricaria fallax
Hypoptopomatinae
Neoplecostomini
Pareiorhaphis steindachneri
Hypostominae
Chaetostoma Clade
Chaetostoma bifurcum
Chaetostoma dermorhynchum
Chaetostoma fischeri
Chaetostoma n.sp. Meta L445
Chaetostoma vasquezi
Dolichancistrus carnegiei
Transancistrus santarosensis
Ancistrini
Ancistrus clementinae
Ancistrus ranunculus
Corymbophanes kaiei
Dekeyseria pulchra
Dekeyseria scaphirhyncha
Guyanancistrus brevispinis
Hopliancistrus tricornis
Lasiancistrus schomburgkii
Lasiancistrus tentaculatus
Lithoxancistrus orinoco
Lithoxancistrus yekuana
Neblinichthys brevibracchium
Neblinichthys echinasus
Paulasquama callis
Pseudolithoxus dumus
Pseudolithoxus tigris
Pseudolithoxus stearleyi
Pseudancistrus Clade
Pseudancistrus nigrescens
Lithoxus Clade
Exastilithoxus fimbriatus
Exastilithoxus n.sp. Ventuari
Lithoxus jantjae
Lithoxus lithoides
Tissue #
Type specimen
Type species
# of loci
16S
Cytb
RAG1
RAG2
Myh6
Table 1
V5509
2 X
T12932
T12839
X
Voucher Cat #
X AUM 43867
Country
Drainage
Venezuela
Orinoco River
4 X X X X
ROM 94924
5 X X X X X ROM 90345
unknown
Bolivia
Mamoré River
CH146
CH161
5 X X X X X MUSM uncataloged
5 X X X X X MUSM uncataloged
Peru
Peru
Huallaga River
Huallaga River
T17140
T9048
5 X X X X X ROM
4 X X
X X AUM 62934
Guyana
Guyana
Potaro River
Potaro River
T14765
4 X X X
Brazil
Pirapetinga River
T06287
4 X X X X
ROM 85921
Guyana
Essequibo River
V5314
T06853
4 X X X X
AUM 42218
5 X X X X X ROM 86207
Guyana
Rupununi Rive
G5063
5 X X X X X AUM 44444
Guyana
Essequibo River
X MCP 42452
Genbank
Genbank
T13602
T14258
T9026
T12930
T09945
6650
T13980
*
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ROM 93687
ROM 93656
STRI 7604
ROM 94925
AUM 53812
ANSP 189598
X ROM 93798
Ecuador
Ecuador
Panama
Colombia
Venezuela
Colombia
Ecuador
Esmeraldas River
Pastaza River
Chagres River
Meta River
Caura River
Magdalena River
Santa Rosa River
T13829
B1500
T12637
V5296
T09540
SU01-121
T9017
P6125
T09686
T09663
T9004
T06068
T06066
T06189
T09512
T09376
V5533
*
*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ecuador
Brazil
Guyana
Venezuela
Venezuela
Suriname
unknown
Peru
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Guyana
Guyana
Guyana
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Guayas River
Xingu River
Potaro River
Atabapo River
Ventuari River
Nickerie River
†
*
*
*
* †
*
* †
* †
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
G5942
*
5 X X X X X AUM 45299
Guyana
Essequibo River
V049
T09667
T9019
T412
* † 5
*
5
5
† 4
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Guyana
Caroni River
Ventuari River
Ventuari River
Essequibo River
*
*
*
* †
†
X
X
X
X
X X X X X
X X X X X
X X X X X
X
X X X
ROM 93737
ANSP 199525
ROM 89856
AUM 44110
AUM 54309
MHNG 2621.073
AUM 39853
AUM 45548
AUM 53895
AUM 54439
AUM 39473
ROM 83692
ROM 83692
ROM 83784
ANSP 190757
AUM 57674
AUM 43872
AUM 36632
AUM 54450
AUM 39475
AUM 37922
Marañon River
Ventuari River
Ventuari River
Ventuari River
Mazaruni River
Mazaruni River
Mazaruni River
Ventuari River
Orinoco River
Soromoni River
Lithoxus pallidimaculatus
Acanthicus Clade
Acanthicus hystrix
Leporacanthicus triactis
Megalancistrus barae
Pseudacanthicus leopardus
Hemiancistrus
'Baryancistrus' beggini
'Baryancistrus' beggini
'Baryancistrus' beggini
'Baryancistrus' demantoides
'Baryancistrus' demantoides
'Baryancistrus' demantoides
'Hemiancistrus' guahiborum
'Hemiancistrus' guahiborum
'Hemiancistrus' guahiborum
'Hemiancistrus' guahiborum
'Hemiancistrus' subviridis
'Hemiancistrus' subviridis
'Hemiancistrus' subviridis
Baryancistrus chrysolomus
Baryancistrus chrysolomus
Baryancistrus niveatus
Baryancistrus niveatus
Baryancistrus niveatus
Baryancistrus niveatus
Baryancistrus n.sp. L142
Baryancistrus xanthellus
Baryancistrus xanthellus
Baryancistrus xanthellus
Hemiancistrus medians
Panaque cf. armbrusteri
Panaque cf. armbrusteri
Panaque cf. armbrusteri
Panaque cf. armbrusteri
Panaque bathyphilus
Panaque bathyphilus
Panaque bathyphilus
Panaque bathyphilus
Panaque bathyphilus
Panaque bathyphilus
Panaque bathyphilus
Panaque cochliodon
Panaque nigrolineatus
Panaque nigrolineatus
Panaque n.sp. Ariari
Panaque schaeferi
Panaque schaeferi
Panaque schaeferi
Panaque schaeferi
Panaque schaeferi
Panaque schaeferi
Panaque schaeferi
Panaque schaeferi
Parancistrus nudiventris
Parancistrus nudiventris
Parancistrus nudiventris
Parancistrus nudiventris
Parancistrus nudiventris
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
T9021
5900
T09826
T9045
G5089
T09392
T09393
V5424
T09361
T09334
V026
V096
V097
T09949
T09400
T09437
T09609
T09248
B1505
B1506
HLF1288
HLF1405
B1984
B1985
T17420
B1490
B2163
B2064
6948
B2189
B2188
BR936
BR1024
P6269
8241
6000
4172
P6279
T07132
T07191
T14628
T09018
T10799
T17418
T9023
6651
6003
5997
6649b
6002
T9043
T9044
B1526
B1520
B2086
B2052
B2050
B1496
B1495
B2061
B2059
B2068
B2069
B2080
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
†
*
* †
*
* †
*
*
†
5 X X X X X AUM 50410
Suriname
Maroni River
5
5
5
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
UFRO-ICT uncatalogued
AUM 54030
photo only
AUM 44440
Brazil
Venezuela
Brazil
Guyana
Madeira River
Ventuari River
São Francisco
Essequibo River
5
5
4
5
5
5
3
2
3
3
5
5
3
4
4
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
3
5
4
3
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
4
5
2
5
3
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
4
5
4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X X X
X
X
X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X X X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X X X
X
X
X X X
X
X
AUM 54990
AUM 54990
AUM 42145
ROM 93339
ROM 93339
AUM 39228
AUM 39239
AUM 39239
ROM 94545
AUM 57677
AUM 54456
ROM 93588
ROM 94149
INPA uncataloged
INPA uncataloged
INPA uncataloged
INPA uncataloged
INPA uncataloged
ANSP 199623
ROM 95253
ANSP 199528
ANSP 193086
INPA uncataloged
ANSP 187122
ANSP 193093
ANSP 193093
MNRJ 15209
MNRJ 15238
AUM 45503
UFRO-ICT 17666
UFRO-ICT 13109
UFRO-ICT 6383
AUM 45503
ROM 88352
ROM 88920
photo only
AUM 53764
ROM 91268
ROM 95251
INHS 55408
UFRO-ICT 13162
UFRO-ICT 13146
UFRO-ICT 13152
UFRO-ICT 13162
UFRO-ICT 13152
MUSM 39426
MUSM 39427
ANSP 199530
ANSP 199529
ANSP 193002
INPA uncatalogued
ANSP 193072
ANSP 199539
ANSP 199539
ANSP 193020
ANSP 193020
ANSP 193013
ANSP 193013
ANSP 193013
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Suriname
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Peru
Peru
Peru
Colombia
Venezuela
Colombia
Colombia
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Iriri River
Iriri River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Tapajós River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Marowijne River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Tocantins River
Tocantins River
Marañon River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Marañon River
Iquitos
Iquitos
Magdalena River
Apure River
Meta River
Ariari River
Solimões River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Purus River
Purus River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus punctatissimus
Spectracanthicus zuanoni
Spectracanthicus zuanoni
Spectracanthicus zuanoni
Spectracanthicus zuanoni
Hypostomini
'Hemiancistrus' meizospilos
'Hemiancistrus' punctulatus
'Hemiancistrus' votuoro
Hypostomus (Coch.) macushi
Hypostomus (Coch.) pyrineusi
Hypostomus (Coch.) taphorni
Hypostomus (Hyp.) rhantos
Pterygoplichthys gibbiceps
Peckoltia Clade
'Hemiancistrus' landoni
'Hemiancistrus' landoni
'Hemiancistrus' landoni
'Spectracanthicus' immaculatus
'Spectracanthicus' immaculatus
Ancistomus feldbergae
Ancistomus feldbergae
Ancistomus feldbergae
Ancistomus feldbergae
Ancistomus snethlageae
Aphanotorulus emarginatus
Aphanotorulus squalinus
Hypancistrus contradens
Hypancistrus contradens
Hypancistrus contradens
Hypancistrus debilittera
Hypancistrus debilittera
Hypancistrus furunculus
Hypancistrus furunculus
Hypancistrus furunculus
Hypancistrus lunaorum
Hypancistrus lunaorum
Hypancistrus n.sp. Xingu L174
Hypancistrus n.sp. Xingu L174
Hypancistrus vandragti
Hypancistrus vandragti
Hypancistrus vandragti
Isorineloricaria spinosissima
Isorineloricaria spinosissima
Isorineloricaria spinosissima
Panafilus albivermis
Panafilus cf. albivermis
Panafilus cf. albivermis
Panafilus cf. albivermis
Panafilus albomaculatus
Panafilus albomaculatus
Panafilus albomaculatus
Panafilus n.sp. Huallaga L351
Panafilus n.sp. Madeira
Panafilus n.sp. Madeira
Panafilus n.sp. Moa L453
Panafilus n.sp. Napo L466
Panafilus n.sp. Ucayali L425
Panafilus n.sp. Ucayali L425
Panafilus nix
Panafilus nix
Panafilus nix
B1521
B2151
B2174
B1980
B1979
B1982
B2172
B1515
B2116
4
5
5
4
3
4
5
4
2
T14750
T14754
T14766
T07038
T10377
T07074
T09530
P4893
4
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
T13601
T13836
T13837
T1385
T1387
B2071
B2072
B2178
B2181
T17383
B2046
T09528
T09355
T09407
V062
T09279
T09280
T09278
T09440
V028
T09562
V118
B2141
B2142
T09307
T09367
T09490
T13692
T13694
T13764
P27
PE08-754
PE08-842
PE08-755
P18
P6121
P6147
P17
6376
6684
P25
P14
P19
P20
4170
5999
7645
*
*
*
4
5
5
*
4
*
4
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
*
5
4
5
*
5
5
4
5
*
5
*
5
5
5
5
5
4
* † 5
* † 5
3
4
*
5
5
5
3
5
5
5
4
4
2
4
5
3
5
5
4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X ANSP 199538
X X X ANSP 193076
X X X ANSP 193092
X
X ANSP 199620
X
X ANSP 199624
X
X ANSP 199619
X X X ANSP 193095
X
X ANSP 199537
X
ANSP 193047
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X MCP 40168
X MCP 40946
MCP 44181
X X ROM 85939
X X AUM 51394
X X ROM 86352
X X AUM 54306
X X AUM 42131
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Guyana
Peru
Guyana
Venezuela
Venezuela
Chapecó River
Carreiro River
Passo Fundo River
Essequibo River
Madre de Dios River
Essequibo River
Ventuari River
Casiquiare River
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ecuador
Ecuador
Ecuador
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
unknown
Brazil
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Brazil
Brazil
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Ecuador
Ecuador
Ecuador
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Peru
Peru
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Esmeraldas Rivr
Guayas River
Guayas River
Xingu River (mouth)
Xingu River (mouth)
Iriri River
Iriri River
Bacaja River
Bacaja River
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
ROM 93688
ROM 93738
ROM 93738
ANSP 194670
ANSP 194670
INPA uncatalogued
ANSP 193012
ANSP 193088
ANSP 193088
ROM 95302
ANSP 199645
AUM 54305
ANSP 190815
AUM 54993
AUM 39241
AUM 53528
ROM 94150
ROM 94150
AUM 54463
AUM 39225
ROM 92224
AUM 39247
ANSP 193084
ANSP 193084
AUM 54408
AUM 54408
ROM 93324
ROM 93722
ROM 93722
ROM 93065
photo only
MHNG 2710.077
MHNG 2710.083
MHNG 2710.077
photo only
AUM 45502
AUM 45502
photo only
UFRO-ICT 5497
UFRO-ICT 5497
photo only
photo only
photo only
photo only
UFRO-ICT 6384
UFRO-ICT 13132
UFRO-ICT 19646
Xingu River
Ventuari River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Ventuari River
Guayas River
Guayas River
Guayas River
Ucayali River
Ucayali River
Ucayali River
Marañon River
Marañon River
Marañon River
Huallaga River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Moa River
Napo River
Ucayali River
Ucayali River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Panafilus nix
Panafilus nocturnus
Panafilus nocturnus
Panafilus nocturnus
Panafilus nocturnus
Panaqoco maccus
Panaqoco maccus
Panaqoco n.sp. Orinoco L448
Panaqoco n.sp. Tomo L465
Panaqolus changae
Panaqolus claustellifer
Panaqolus claustellifer
Panaqolus claustellifer
Panaqolus gnomus
Panaqolus gnomus
Panaqolus n.sp. Amazon L397
Panaqolus n.sp. Curua Una
Panaqolus n.sp. Itaya L459
Panaqolus n.sp. Negro L169
Panaqolus n.sp. Tocantins L002
Panaqolus n.sp. Ucayali L206
Panaqolus n.sp. Ucayali L206
Panaqolus n.sp. Ucayali L206
Panaqolus n.sp. Ucayali L206
Panaqolus n.sp. Ucayali L206
Panaqolus n.sp. Xingu L398
Panaqolus n.sp. Xingu L398
Panaqolus purusiensis
Panaqolus purusiensis
Peckoltia furcata
Peckoltia braueri
Peckoltia compta
Peckoltia compta
Peckoltia lineola
Peckoltia lineola
Peckoltia lujani
Peckoltia lujani
Peckoltia n.sp. Madeira L210
Peckoltia n.sp. Orinoco L147
Peckoltia pankimpuju
Peckoltia relictum
Peckoltia relictum
Peckoltia relictum
Peckoltia sabaji
Peckoltia sabaji
Peckoltia sabaji
Peckoltia sabaji
Peckoltia sabaji
Peckoltia vittata
Peckoltia vittata
Peckoltia vittata
Peckoltia vittata
Peckoltia wernekei
Peckoltia wernekei
Peckoltichthys bachi
Peckoltichthys bachi
Peckoltichthys bachi
Scobinancistrus aff. pariolispos L082
Scobinancistrus aff. pariolispos L082
Scobinancistrus aureatus
Scobinancistrus aureatus
Scobinancistrus aureatus
Scobinancistrus pariolispos
Pseudoqolus koko
7647
MUS773
P26
P6126
P6127
T09009
T09016
P22
P29
T660
G07258
G5183
P16
P6128
P6129
P13
P24
P12
P21
P15
P11
PE08-749
PE08-752
PE08-839
PE08-840
598
P23
4652
4654
P6200
T06465
T10774
T10775
T09831
T09832
T09143
T09144
T14753
T17381
P6233
CH157
P6099
P6100
B1969
B2175
T09602
T09719
T12928
8973
10514
B1507
B2152
T09533
T09534
9220
P6196
P6254
B1518
B2113
B2115
B2153
B2193
B2088
GF00-115
4
4
3
4
3
5
5
2
1
*
*
*
* †
*
*
*
†
* †
* †
†
* †
†
†
*
2
5
3
5
5
3
1
4
1
5
4
5
4
4
5
5
2
2
3
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
2
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
5
5
4
1
3
4
5
5
5
3
3
5
4
5
3
4
4
4
4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X X X X
X X
X X X X
X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
INPA 39606
MHNG 2726.063
photo only
AUM 45500
AUM 45500
AUM 53768
ROM 94129
photo only
photo only
ANSP 181097
AUM 47717
AUM 44721
photo only
AUM 45501
AUM 45501
photo only
photo only
photo only
photo only
photo only
photo only
MHNG 2710.076
MHNG 2710.077
MHNG 2710.082
MHNG 2710.082
LIA_M 0598
photo only
UFRO-ICT17720
UFRO-ICT17720
AUM 45593
ROM 86240
ROM 91263
ROM 91263
AUM 54033
ROM 94334
ANSP 190894
ROM 93352
MCP 35628
ROM 95301
AUM 45595
MUSM 44256
AUM 45531
AUM 45531
ANSP 199615
ANSP 193089
ANSP 191152
AUM 53577
photo only
UFRO-ICT8282
photo only
ANSP 199531
ANSP 193078
AUM 54314
AUM 54314
UFRO-ICT17328
AUM 45592
AUM 45592
ANSP 199534
ANSP 193045
ANSP 193044
ANSP 193075
ANSP 193094
ANSP 193006
MNHN 2011-0013
Brazil
Bolivia
Peru
Peru
Peru
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Peru
Guyana
Guyana
Guyana
Peru
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Peru
Guyana
Brazil
Brazil
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Venezuela
Brazil
Venezuela
Peru
Peru
Peru
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Venezuela
Venezuela
unknown
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Venezuela
Venezuela
Brazil
Peru
Peru
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
French Guiana
Madeira River
Purus River
Huallaga River
Marañon River
Marañon River
Guanare River
Guanare River
Orinoco River
Tomo River
Itaya River
Tacutu River
Tacutu River
Tacutu River
Marañon River
Marañon River
Curua-Una River
Itaya River
Negro River
Tocantins River
Ucayali River
Ucayali River
Ucayali River
Ucayali River
Ucayali River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Purus River
Purus River
Marañon River
Takutu River
Tapajós River
Tapajós River
Ventuari River
Ventuari River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Madeira River
Orinoco River
Marañon River
Huallaga River
Marañon River
Marañon River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Madeira River
Madeira River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Orinoco River
Orinoco River
Madeira River
Marañon River
Marañon River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Xingu River
Maroni River
Table 2
Node
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
BI
1.00
1.00
0.89
1.00
1.00
0.59
0.97
1.00
1.00
0.87
1.00
0.87
0.52
–
0.56
1.00
0.91
0.84
0.78
0.62
1.00
1.00
1.00
–
1.00
1.00
0.71
0.99
0.96
ML
99
96
68
99
69
72
88
91
90
82
100
71
12
–
86
90
56
83
56
–
86
92
100
–
99
76
–
95
81
Clade
parallel-jawed Panafilus
Panafilus n.sg.
Panaqoco n.sg.
Panaqolus n.sg.
genus Panaqolus
Scobinancistrus
Ancistomus
Node
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
BI
0.50
0.51
0.52
0.98
0.64
1.00
0.61
0.68
0.94
0.99
–
1.00
0.84
0.97
–
–
–
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.71
0.96
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
ML
–
35
44
77
63
99
60
59
61
99
–
77
26
63
–
–
–
100
100
99
98
51
72
100
97
100
88
100
99
Clade
Peckoltia sabaji
Peckoltia relictum
Orinoco Peckoltia
Peckoltia
Orinoco Hypancistrus
Hypancistrus
Aphanotorulus
'Hemiancistrus' landoni
Peckoltia Clade
Table 3
Node
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
BI
0.68
1.00
1.00
1.00
–
0.74
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
ML
Clade
65
99
99
100
49
46
100 Panaque
92
Spectracanthicus
100
99
100
Node
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
BI
1.00
1.00
0.58
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
0.88
1.00
1.00
ML
Clade
100 Baryancistrus
100
39
100
100
68 upper Orinoco species
67
63
100
99